Current Topics
What Can Be Done About The Bipartisan Corruption In Our Government?
by NW Ponderer
0 seconds ago
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by NW Ponderer
11 minutes 0 seconds ago
Where have all the conservatives gone?
by NW Ponderer
12 minutes 56 seconds ago
SF Board of Supervisors declare NRA a domestic terrorist organization
by perotista
Today at 12:09 AM
The Departed - 2019
by NW Ponderer
Today at 12:06 AM
A REMINDER ABOUT FORUM GUIDELINES
by pdx rick
Today at 12:01 AM
Government. What is it and why do we need it?
by logtroll
Yesterday at 06:23 PM
What do words mean?
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 05:37 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by logtroll
Yesterday at 01:00 PM
Republicans to scrap primaries and caucuses
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 04:58 AM
And we're off and running!
by chunkstyle
09/16/19 12:49 PM
Emoluments, anyone?
by Greger
09/14/19 05:41 PM
This Might Bite Fox News in the Butt
by pdx rick
09/14/19 04:24 AM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by NW Ponderer
09/13/19 06:08 AM
Live Dorian Feed From Central Florida
by Greger
09/13/19 01:49 AM
Bolton Fired
by pdx rick
09/12/19 06:50 PM
Annex West Bank
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:52 PM
Democratic Actions
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:49 PM
President Mean Girl
by pdx rick
09/12/19 01:29 PM
GOP corruption and cheating is beyond the pale
by pondering_it_all
09/12/19 08:09 AM
Forum Stats
6282 Members
59 Forums
16691 Topics
289576 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 21 of 29 < 1 2 ... 19 20 21 22 23 ... 28 29 >
Topic Options
#112350 - 05/22/09 03:35 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: issodhos]
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21134
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
 Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
I suppose you haven't spent much time on the Constitution, have you - its structure and purpose? Oh, but discussion of that substantive portion of my earlier post would detract from the distraction of focusing on semantics, wouldn't it?

Well, I must admit that I have not spent much time restructuring, re-purposing, and fancifully re-interpreting it into a moldy piece of cheese that can be shaped into any transient form that is useful at any given moment, NW Ponderer.

 Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
"Rights" are merely interests that have gained sufficient importance to be protected by legal strictures - oh, which means protected by the State.


That is, at best, a description of privileges granted (and easily rescinded) by the State to its subjects, NW Ponderer, not Rights. Though, I do see how handy it can be to present Rights as being subject to the arbitrary interpretation of a ruling class, I remain much more comfortable with what I wrote in another thread quite some time back:
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
Allow me to first repeat, with emphasis added, what I have previously written, which was, “My view is that rights are inalienable and pre-exist the state and also pre-exist any agreement made among men to recognize them.” Please note that I did not write that they pre-existed man. I also wrote that “rights are integral to the human mind” which is to say they are integral to man. They are essential to the completeness of man and reflect the nature of man, not nature in general, not ‘natural’ man, but the nature of man.

Yours,
Issodhos


What you fail to seem to be able to comprehend, issodhos, is something several of us have repeatedly made available to you -- there is no basis for your claim, either in logic or science. Humans did not develop with a notion of "rights", alienable or not. That is a very recent concept which even today is not universally a part of all human being's reality.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top
#112357 - 05/22/09 04:12 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: issodhos]
Schlack Offline
veteran

Registered: 07/22/04
Posts: 9718
Loc: Ireland
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
 Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
In other words, rights are "notional."


In other words, Rights are "inherent". How's that for a stand-off?:-)
Yours,
Issodhos


and women of course have enjoyed the same inherent rights as equals with men right? erm when were women allowed vote? own property etc. it has been the same throughout history has it? Piffle i believe is the word, even a cursory glance through history negates the notion of natural rights....

throughout history, rights have had to be fought for and won. they are not inherent, they are not natural, they are developed, fought over, ammended changed, redefined througout history.

it is often in the course of the struggle that rights are defined, refined and codified, quite often after a revolution - political or social.
_________________________
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)


Top
#112358 - 05/22/09 04:17 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Phil Hoskins]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
 Originally Posted By: Phil Hoskins
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
 Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
I suppose you haven't spent much time on the Constitution, have you - its structure and purpose? Oh, but discussion of that substantive portion of my earlier post would detract from the distraction of focusing on semantics, wouldn't it?

Well, I must admit that I have not spent much time restructuring, re-purposing, and fancifully re-interpreting it into a moldy piece of cheese that can be shaped into any transient form that is useful at any given moment, NW Ponderer.

 Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
"Rights" are merely interests that have gained sufficient importance to be protected by legal strictures - oh, which means protected by the State.


That is, at best, a description of privileges granted (and easily rescinded) by the State to its subjects, NW Ponderer, not Rights. Though, I do see how handy it can be to present Rights as being subject to the arbitrary interpretation of a ruling class, I remain much more comfortable with what I wrote in another thread quite some time back:
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
Allow me to first repeat, with emphasis added, what I have previously written, which was, “My view is that rights are inalienable and pre-exist the state and also pre-exist any agreement made among men to recognize them.” Please note that I did not write that they pre-existed man. I also wrote that “rights are integral to the human mind” which is to say they are integral to man. They are essential to the completeness of man and reflect the nature of man, not nature in general, not ‘natural’ man, but the nature of man.

Yours,
Issodhos


What you fail to seem to be able to comprehend, issodhos, is something several of us have repeatedly made available to you -- there is no basis for your claim, either in logic or science. Humans did not develop with a notion of "rights", alienable or not. That is a very recent concept which even today is not universally a part of all human being's reality.


Please understand, Phil, I do appreciate that several of you deigned to descend from Mt. Olympus, even if only briefly, to bestow upon this mere mortal the perceived wisdom of your paradigm. Your proclamation is again noted.:-)
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
#112359 - 05/22/09 04:23 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: issodhos]
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21134
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
Issodhos, I don't see the need for sarcasm, I had hoped you would see that you state things as though they are the eternal truth. When I or someone else either asks for substantiation or posits an alternative "truth", you find a way to ignore it.

But the thread was and is intended to give us an opportunity to get at these basic elements in a real discussion. All I am saying is that the science of human development does not support your assertion that the state evolved to protect individual rights. I suggest the evidence is the exact opposite and that only within the last couple of centuries has that concept emerged.

To me this is important, because of your claim that rights are "inalienable" as contrasted with my claim that rights are dependent upon a structure of enforcement.


Edited by Phil Hoskins (05/22/09 04:25 PM)
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top
#112362 - 05/22/09 04:29 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Phil Hoskins]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15327
Loc: Florida
Yesterday we were discussing "property" and how primitives held everything in "common". I submit that children are perhaps the most primitive form of humans, fuzzy brained, with only the vestiges of genetic memories passed down from the parents. They must be taught everything from how to eat, walk, and talk. I further submit that, while more often than not the first word that baby learns is "Mommy", the second more often than not is Mine Mine Mine! Does baby learn this concept of property rights so easily or is it ingrained, actually genetically passed down rather than learned. This "right" to posses something and not have it taken away is no different from any savage beast which claims the right to control "territory". Said beast, by virtue of whuppin' your ass, also claims the right to mate with the nearest female, claims the right to biggest chunk of food etc. etc.
In conclusion I submit that "rights" preceded even intelligence.

I apologize if this thread is supposed to be a one way street where everyone bashes Issodhos, I just keep seeing other ways to think about the various assertions and condemnations. Feel free to shoot me down, Isso wont be back for hours anyway....

Edit: Welcome back Issodos! I didn't imagine we would be seeing you until this evening.


Edited by Greger (05/22/09 04:34 PM)
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#112363 - 05/22/09 04:31 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Schlack]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
 Originally Posted By: Schlack

and women of course have enjoyed the same inherent rights as equals with men right?


Females have, and always have had, the same natural rights that men have. For ages, and in some societies continuing today, females were prevented from exercising those natural rights.

If you are interested in the subject, here are a couple of links to CHB threads that previously discussed rights:
Do We Have Individual Rights?

and

Individual Rights vs Group rights
Yours,
Issodhos
P.s. So, how are those EU fishermen doing now that we resolved their dilemma?:-)
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
#112364 - 05/22/09 05:05 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Phil Hoskins]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15327
Loc: Florida
 Quote:
To me this is important, because of your claim that rights are "inalienable" as contrasted with my claim that rights are dependent upon a structure of enforcement.

Phil, why can't both of these things be true? As with womens rights it's easy to see that women have the same rights as men but without a structure of enforcement it's all to possible for these "inalienable rights" to be usurped.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#112365 - 05/22/09 05:07 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Greger]
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21134
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
Greger no one is "bashing" issodhos nor anyone else, we are, however, challenging some assertions and that is what this board does so well.

I think, with regard to your "mine mine mine" statement, that you have conflated desire with right. Of course humans are aquisitive and no doubt protective of what they have acquired. That is precisely what I and others have acknowledged as underlying the other human trait, the use of force to protect acquisitions.

But lets get history correct. Early humans had first to develop a sense of "self" before either ownership or rights could be conceived of. That took many millenia to come about. As it developed, most small hunter-gatherer clusters evolved into chiefdoms which is when the first concept of differentiation of role and place occurred.

Some time later these chiefdoms evolved into tribes, where the first forms of specialized behavior and public forms of structure came about. At none of these levels is there any notion of individual rights, as contrasted to a very primitive and developing concept of individual ownership.

The notion of rights probably did develop around property, but at all times was it clear that the right without a system of enfocing those rights made the right illusory.

The whole discussion of whether that right sprang from the state or was inalienable is a false dichotomy. The concept of rights sprang from the ego developed mind of man and those with an interest in stability and order found it expedient to use the state to enforce claims of right.

I have no quarrel with the concept of "inalienable" rights if it is also recognized that absent state enforcement and protection of those rights, they are illusory and therefore an abstraction. I see nothing advancing the practical, down to earth, real world experience of living that is enhanced by that abstraction.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top
#112367 - 05/22/09 05:10 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: Phil Hoskins]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
 Originally Posted By: Phil Hoskins

But the thread was and is intended to give us an opportunity to get at these basic elements in a real discussion. All I am saying is that the science of human development does not support your assertion that the state evolved to protect individual rights. I suggest the evidence is the exact opposite and that only within the last couple of centuries has that concept emerged.


I seriously doubt that was the intent of starting this thread, Phil, and I think there are a number of posters now seeking to distance themselves from the discussion of how a libertarian-oriented society would work.

It is incorrect to say that I assert that the state evolved to protect individual rights. I have been clear that I support the concept that the reason for instituting government is to secure and protect individual rights. Is that a recent concept? Yes. Does that have a relevence to the existance of natural rights? No. Government does not "evolve" -- it is "instituted" by those who have the power to do so, and instituted in the form they dictate.
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
#112370 - 05/22/09 05:49 PM Re: Libertarianism Makes You Stupid [Re: issodhos]
Schlack Offline
veteran

Registered: 07/22/04
Posts: 9718
Loc: Ireland
 Originally Posted By: issodhos
 Originally Posted By: Schlack

and women of course have enjoyed the same inherent rights as equals with men right?


Females have, and always have had, the same natural rights that men have. For ages, and in some societies continuing today, females were prevented from exercising those natural rights.


is there some law of physics or biology that is the foundation of these rights?

all human behaviour has developed throughout the development of our species. thought is but one of them. the notion of "rights" has been different thoughout history. Rights are a human construct. if by Natural rights, you mean a particular construction version of rights, i can agree that yes they exist. if youre meaning is that natural rights are a distinct idea that has always existed and only recently been discovered.. well ... piffle ... unless of course you can provide a fossil record.

(could you please clarify lest this all be a semantic misunderstanding)

funnily enough I should, given a little time (and a little less booze) be able to present a fossil record of the development of rights, uneven and with many evolutionary off shoots (libertarianism being one). we will be able to view rights developing over time.

how, if they developed over time, could we arrive at natural rights? we could arrive at refined rights, developed rights, legacy rights no problemo, i just have a hard time accepting that all the greatest minds of history did not stumble accross the same natural rights as your particular band of libertarianism. or that they didnt all branch off from the stem of natural rights.

I cannot agree that people went about purposefully denying peoplye their natural rights, that were only defined relatively recently, rather than applying their societal norms - for example Nobility, slaves and women. Their rights were inherently different and many at the time would have claimed that order as "natural",

"Natural" seems to be a weasel word designed, i think to try to own debate, who could be against something natural. - a bit like pro-life!

 Quote:

P.s. So, how are those EU fishermen doing now that we resolved their dilemma?:-)


im contemplating my response, I want to be careful that that strand of this thread doesnt end up being a pantomime: "oh no he didnt, OH YES HE DID". rest assured I will come back to you, hopefully with something exploratory or constructive.
_________________________
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)


Top
Page 21 of 29 < 1 2 ... 19 20 21 22 23 ... 28 29 >

Who's Online
1 registered (NW Ponderer), 42 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista, ttwtt78640
6282 Registered Users
A2