Current Topics
50 dead, 53 wounded in Orlando gay club massacre
by pdx rick
38 minutes 8 seconds ago
Trump's Trumpet
by pdx rick
44 minutes 31 seconds ago
The Female Race
by pondering_it_all
Today at 02:01 PM
England votes to exit the EU
by Ezekiel
Yesterday at 12:58 PM
The real lessons of Brexit vote
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 12:39 PM
Jobs, Poverty and Underclass
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 11:01 AM
Campaign 2016
by pdx rick
06/24/16 03:31 PM
Guns, Terrorism & Politics
by Ezekiel
06/24/16 06:50 AM
Why you should know what happened in Freddie Gray’s life — long before his death
by Spag-hetti
06/23/16 01:22 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by pondering_it_all
06/23/16 02:15 AM
Justice Clarence Thomas mulling retirement?
by Ezekiel
06/22/16 08:27 PM
VP PREDICTIONS!!
by NW Ponderer
06/22/16 03:54 PM
ReaderRant RoundTable For June, 2016
by NW Ponderer
06/21/16 12:52 AM
Where did ISIS come from? The story starts here.
by pdx rick
06/20/16 03:33 PM
What Should Bernie Sanders Do Next?
by pdx rick
06/20/16 01:56 PM
Forum Stats
6154 Members
56 Forums
15287 Topics
262819 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#209467 - 01/19/12 02:57 AM Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts
Ozymanithrax Offline
member

Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 1347
Loc: California
Quote:
Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts


The deficit-slashing supercommittee left Congress with quite the mess to mop up in 2012.

With each day that ticks by, the nation becomes a bit closer to a painful round of automatic budget cuts that the 12-member supercommittee failed to prevent because of its members’ inability to agree on a $1.2 trillion deal to cut the deficit.


So, despite a veto threat from President Barack Obama, congressional Republicans and a handful of Democrats have vowed to somehow unravel the spending cuts this year — which are scheduled to hit defense and domestic programs equally in January 2013.

“I’m very concerned about the defense cuts in sequestration, but it’s also the cuts to nondefense discretionary [that] are also devastating,” Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) told POLITICO. “Ultimately, I think there’s a very strong feeling that it’s not going to go into effect.”

Just when you think they are going to actually cut spending, they don't.

It will be interesting to see if President Obama uses that Veto Pen or back away.
_________________________
“If you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinskey

Top
#209471 - 01/19/12 06:18 AM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Ozymanithrax]
Greger Offline

Pooh-Bah

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 13056
Loc: Florida
More interesting to me is that the "Deficit Hawks" are completely full of crap. Cutting the deficit was never really their goal. Making the President look like a big spender was all they were after. Now, going into the election, the GOP will reveal itself, once again, as being politically motivated with no intention to govern effectively.
Ultimately it is Republicans who must cave and allow at least marginal tax increases to go hand in hand with budget cuts to reduce the deficit.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#209486 - 01/19/12 11:15 AM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Greger]
Ozymanithrax Offline
member

Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 1347
Loc: California
I have long felt that Deficit Hawks are about personal power, not about actually reducing spending. They never dramatically cut anything. Even those deficit hawks who tout their record of voting against higher budgets, lard up the budget with pork by product that they know will pass anyway.
_________________________
“If you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinskey

Top
#209490 - 01/19/12 11:25 AM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Ozymanithrax]
Chuck Howard Offline
old hand

Registered: 09/17/01
Posts: 6723
Loc: Philly 'burbs
I'm in favor of the "do nothing plan" which would solve our so-called "deficit problem."

Top
#209499 - 01/19/12 12:09 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Ozymanithrax]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 38402
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Typical of this Congress: when they said those cuts would be "automatic", it must be that "was not intended to be a factual statement" - in the immortal words of Sen. Kyl.

Congress selected these programs that would be cut when they passed the Bill. Now they want to change what they passed. A tad too late to blame anyone but themselves.

As far as I am concerned all of the cuts should come from Defense. We are not an Empire or the World's policeman as the GOP would have us think and as soon as the rest of the world realizes this fact, hopefully, they will "pony up" to their own defense needs.

The only reason many of these politicians are against the proposed cuts in defense spending is the relationship between high employment and defense spending in their districts. They are only concerned about re-election campaign contributions drying up and voter rejection.




_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#209500 - 01/19/12 12:20 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Chuck Howard]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 38402
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: Chuck Howard
I'm in favor of the "do nothing plan" which would solve our so-called "deficit problem."

I agree. Bow
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#209521 - 01/19/12 01:42 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: pdx rick]
Ozymanithrax Offline
member

Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 1347
Loc: California
Originally Posted By: california rick
Typical of this Congress: when they said those cuts would be "automatic", it must be that "was not intended to be a factual statement" - in the immortal words of Sen. Kyl.

Congress selected these programs that would be cut when they passed the Bill. Now they want to change what they passed. A tad too late to blame anyone but themselves.

As far as I am concerned all of the cuts should come from Defense. We are not an Empire or the World's policeman as the GOP would have us think and as soon as the rest of the world realizes this fact, hopefully, they will "pony up" to their own defense needs.

The only reason many of these politicians are against the proposed cuts in defense spending is the relationship between high employment and defense spending in their districts. They are only concerned about re-election campaign contributions drying up and voter rejection.

These automatic Spending cuts were supposed to kill sacred cows in order to get Congress to agree on whatever the Super Committee would come up with.
Senate passes bill to end debt showdown
The Super committee, however, was designed to fail, by the Republicans.

Every Republican member had signed Grover Norquist's pledge not to raise taxes. (http://s3.amazonaws.com/atrfiles/files/files/091411-federalpledgesigners(1).pdf), an oath that appears to be more binding on them than the one to protect and defend the Constitution. That meant that it was impossible to increase revenues.

It simply isn't possible to end the deficit with spending cuts alone.

In my opinion, the whole Super committee was just political theater. Republicans hoped it would hurt Democrats in general and President Obama specifically, since number 1 goal is to make Obama a 1 Term President. It was all about playing for power instead of paying debts.

Now it has come back to bite them, and they want a do over. The Democrats that want to help them restart their game of politics should be sent home to spend more time with the family, with their Republican Brethren.


Edited by Ozymanithrax (01/19/12 01:45 PM)
_________________________
“If you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinskey

Top
#209525 - 01/19/12 01:56 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Ozymanithrax]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 38402
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: Ozymanithrax
The Democrats that want to help them restart their game of politics should be sent home to spend more time with the family, with their Republican Brethren.

I agree. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#209532 - 01/19/12 02:31 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Chuck Howard]
Scoutgal Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 01/23/01
Posts: 27583
Loc: CA USA
Originally Posted By: Chuck Howard
I'm in favor of the "do nothing plan" which would solve our so-called "deficit problem."


I could live with this, in addition to ending subsidies for oil/gas and agriculture.
_________________________
milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.





Top
#209536 - 01/19/12 02:41 PM Re: Congress tries to disable automatic spending cuts [Re: Scoutgal]
Greger Offline

Pooh-Bah

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 13056
Loc: Florida
Fixing the deficit spending is really not that difficult, but it would require cooperation and good common sense coming out of congress. Apparently nothing is important enough for this congress to consider using common sense as a guide.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 49 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
little head, RobItark, Phillipnene, aqopi, PhillipEscavy
6154 Registered Users
A2