Current Topics
So, who are the Jews here at CHBRR?
by Golem
02/26/17 02:21 AM
BREAKING: Tom Perez Has Been Elected New Chair of the DNC
by pdx rick
02/26/17 01:51 AM
Reader Rant Roundtable for February 2017
by Ken Condon
02/26/17 01:10 AM
Trump Forum
by Ujest Shurly
02/26/17 12:24 AM
Charges expected against Bernard Kerik
by TatumAH
02/25/17 11:12 PM
A big insurer just quit Obamacare
by TatumAH
02/25/17 10:58 PM
Flynn out...Spicer next?
by NW Ponderer
02/25/17 09:07 AM
The Substance Behind the National Guard Story
by pdx rick
02/24/17 08:34 PM
The truth about Trump
by jgw
02/23/17 10:39 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by Golem
02/23/17 08:18 PM
Dozens fired after skipping work to participate in 'A Day Without Immigrants' pr
by pondering_it_all
02/22/17 04:35 AM
Victor Davis Hanson: Seven Days in February
by Golem
02/22/17 12:54 AM
Impossible Possibilities?
by Ken Condon
02/22/17 12:28 AM
Putin's Bitch
by pondering_it_all
02/22/17 12:12 AM
4chan:The Skeleton Key to the Rise of Trump
by pdx rick
02/21/17 08:16 PM
Forum Stats
6218 Members
57 Forums
15751 Topics
272515 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#210620 - 01/26/12 12:27 AM Re: French involvement in Ameican revolution [Re: Ted Remington]
numan Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/06/08
Posts: 10853
Loc: What! Me Worry?
'
Sir William Howe

Quote:
One of the obstacles hindering Howe in effectively conducting the war was in the person of Lord George Germain. Germain was a bizarre personality of history, and an understanding of Germain and his background is necessary to understand some of the problems Howe faced both in England and America....George III...appointed him Secretary of State for the American colonies in 1775....Germain stumbled through his new position of coordinating the American war effort, and each blunder had a direct impact on Howe and his strategy. As Secretary for America, he was completely ignorant of American geography and the character of the colonists. One of his worst faults, as far as English military efforts in America were concerned, was his propensity to tie down his field commanders by issuing minute directions. Exacerbating this proclivity, he repeatedly issued exact orders, but failed to provide adequate reinforcements to carry them out. Germain also utterly failed to act as an efficient communication junction between field commanders by not coordinating multiple battle plans. He often bypassed theater commanders and wrote directly to their subordinate officers, issuing confusing or contradicting orders. Underscoring all this was the fact that brave and honorable men in the field found it difficult to serve under him....Germain was a typical maladroit, who contributed his fair share to the disaster, but was never remiss in criticizing others for their failures. Thus, a good amount of the criticism of Howe that surfaced during and after the war was orchestrated by Germain to cover his own blunderous performance....He knew all along of the conflicting plans, but did nothing to coordinate the effort between the two until it was too late. Germain wrote to Howe no less than eight times between March and April, and in not one letter did he refer to Sir William joining Burgoyne.

Lord Germain must have been a bureaucratic ancestor of Sir Humphrey Appleby!! · · wink
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools -- Herbert Spencer

Top
#210623 - 01/26/12 12:29 AM Re: French involvement in Ameican revolution [Re: Ted Remington]
numan Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/06/08
Posts: 10853
Loc: What! Me Worry?


The 1st Viscount Sackville even looks like Sir Humphrey Appleby!!

· · · grin
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools -- Herbert Spencer

Top
#210624 - 01/26/12 12:35 AM Re: French involvement in American revolution [Re: pdx rick]
Ozymanithrax Offline
member

Registered: 04/11/11
Posts: 1347
Loc: California
Originally Posted By: california rick
Originally Posted By: Ozymanithrax
A good source to the German Mercenaries hired by the British.

...just like the US hired Blackwater mercenaries for the Iraq war. Wasn't it nice that the US government could hire mercenaries to fight with US armed forces in the takeover of a country?

Isn't everyone proud of the way the U.S. government spent our taxpayer money: $4 trillion dollars and nearly 5,000 American lives and over 100,000 Iraqi lives were wasted all for the "humanitarian reasons" outlined by the Bush Administration because Sadam was such a meanie.

Finanical Source

Rick, every European nation, at the time, hired mercenaries. It was simply how wars were fought. The Colonist didn't because they were short of cash. That shouldn't be surprising. Most insurgancies work on a shoestring budget.
_________________________
“If you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinskey

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
2 registered (Golem, Greger), 64 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
tjgraylaw, AndyEmisa, lubluodPix, EugeneHag, DerrickKew
6218 Registered Users
A2