Current Topics
Campaign 2016
by NW Ponderer
1 second ago
Quarterly/Seasonal RT Threads
by NW Ponderer
46 minutes 43 seconds ago
Democratic National Convention - Philadelphia
by pdx rick
Today at 01:37 AM
Trump & Putin. Yes, It's Really a Thing
by pdx rick
Today at 01:34 AM
Trump's Trumpet
by pondering_it_all
Today at 12:10 AM
I Agree with Bernie
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 11:38 PM
Oil Lobby Paid Wa Post and Atlantic to Host Climate-Change Deniers at RNC
by Ezekiel
Yesterday at 09:40 AM
The Clinton-Kaine Ticket
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 12:08 AM
Republican National Convention - Cleveland, OH
by Spag-hetti
07/23/16 11:09 AM
Who will protect Main Street, USA from militarized police forces?
by Ezekiel
07/22/16 12:58 PM
A Toast to Those Who are Gone
by Ezekiel
07/22/16 11:46 AM
Murdochs to fire Roger Ailes?
by Ezekiel
07/21/16 07:40 PM
BREAKING: Star Trek XIII to be titled ‘Star Trek Beyond’
by Golem
07/21/16 04:38 PM
It's Official, Hillary Clinton is Running Against Putin
by Ezekiel
07/21/16 04:37 PM
Coup in Turkey
by Jeffery J. Haas
07/21/16 02:37 PM
Forum Stats
6161 Members
56 Forums
15318 Topics
263764 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#212430 - 02/09/12 05:59 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 13758
BTW, in case anyone wants to read it: PERRY v. BROWN
Quote:
Whether under the Constitution same-sex couples may ever be denied the right to marry, a right that has long been enjoyed by opposite-sex couples, is an important and highly controversial question. It is currently a matter of great debate in our nation, and an issue over which people of good will may disagree, sometimes strongly. Of course, when questions of constitutional law are necessary to the resolution of a case, courts may not and should not abstain from deciding them simply because they are controversial. We need not and do not answer the broader question in this case, however, because California had already extended to committed same-sex couples both the incidents of marriage and the official designation of ‘marriage,’ and Proposition 8's only effect was to take away that important and legally significant designation, while leaving in place all of its incidents. This unique and strictly limited effect of Proposition 8 allows us to address the amendment's constitutionality on narrow grounds.
and
Quote:
By using their initiative power to target a minority group and withdraw a right that it possessed, without a legitimate reason for doing so, the People of California violated the Equal Protection Clause. We hold Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional on this ground. We do not doubt the importance of the more general questions presented to us concerning the rights of same-sex couples to marry, nor do we doubt that these questions will likely be resolved in other states, and for the nation as a whole, by other courts. For now, it suffices to conclude that the People of California may not, consistent with the Federal Constitution, add to their state constitution a provision that has no more practical effect than to strip gays and lesbians of their right to use the official designation that the State and society give to committed relationships, thereby adversely affecting the status and dignity of the members of a disfavored class.


Edited by NW Ponderer (02/09/12 11:55 PM)
Edit Reason: Add Quotations
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#212498 - 02/10/12 12:33 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: Phil Hoskins]
Ken Condon Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/13/07
Posts: 3457
Loc: Eugene, OR
Quote:
Ken, I write prenups and estate plans for my clients, fyi

I am aware of that. It was just designed to be a good natured poke at you.

On the other hand awhile ago we knew a gal whose father was an estate lawyer and he managed to die intestate. It was a can of worms that took the family years to unravel and about did in his spouse. Perhaps that was his intention--who knows.
_________________________
The past is always tense, the future perfect.

Top
#212502 - 02/10/12 01:02 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 13758
I I had been drafting estate plans for over a dozen years before I could convince my wife, also a lawyer, to draft hers.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#213860 - 02/23/12 08:00 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 13758
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3

Who's Online
0 registered (), 53 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
alehyhyt, AesteSt, Jim McKernon, Constitutionalis, RareBear5419
6161 Registered Users
A2