Current Topics
Round Table for the week of August 24-30, 2014
by california rick
11:44 PM
New 'Survivor' cast boasts MLB pitcher John Rocker, Spider-Man actor, and 'Amazi
by california rick
11:37 PM
Iraq
by Ardy
10:04 PM
Israel. Specious arguments wearing thin
by pondering_it_all
09:48 PM
How Clayton Kershaw compares to the greatest pitchers in history
by logtroll
07:34 PM
The 10 Biggest Classic Rock Douchebags
by Golem
07:22 PM
Jim Hoft’s Unsourced Claim: Darren Wilson Had an “Orbital Blowout "
by NW Ponderer
07:17 PM
Dirty politics
by Scoutgal
07:09 PM
Gun Tourism Grows in Popularity in Recent Years
by NW Ponderer
06:38 PM
Stunning before and after images of California's drought
by Ardy
12:56 AM
What happens when you say no to SPPD
by california rick
08/26/14 07:49 PM
Female Kurdish fighters take arms against Islamic State extremists
by california rick
08/26/14 07:27 PM
The Taser Photoshoot: Portraits of People's Faces When Hit With A Stun Gun
by california rick
08/26/14 12:53 PM
Help me understand
by Ardy
08/25/14 09:57 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
08/25/14 03:11 PM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14291 Topics
247093 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#212430 - 02/09/12 05:59 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
veteran

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 11799
BTW, in case anyone wants to read it: PERRY v. BROWN
Quote:
Whether under the Constitution same-sex couples may ever be denied the right to marry, a right that has long been enjoyed by opposite-sex couples, is an important and highly controversial question. It is currently a matter of great debate in our nation, and an issue over which people of good will may disagree, sometimes strongly. Of course, when questions of constitutional law are necessary to the resolution of a case, courts may not and should not abstain from deciding them simply because they are controversial. We need not and do not answer the broader question in this case, however, because California had already extended to committed same-sex couples both the incidents of marriage and the official designation of ‘marriage,’ and Proposition 8's only effect was to take away that important and legally significant designation, while leaving in place all of its incidents. This unique and strictly limited effect of Proposition 8 allows us to address the amendment's constitutionality on narrow grounds.
and
Quote:
By using their initiative power to target a minority group and withdraw a right that it possessed, without a legitimate reason for doing so, the People of California violated the Equal Protection Clause. We hold Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional on this ground. We do not doubt the importance of the more general questions presented to us concerning the rights of same-sex couples to marry, nor do we doubt that these questions will likely be resolved in other states, and for the nation as a whole, by other courts. For now, it suffices to conclude that the People of California may not, consistent with the Federal Constitution, add to their state constitution a provision that has no more practical effect than to strip gays and lesbians of their right to use the official designation that the State and society give to committed relationships, thereby adversely affecting the status and dignity of the members of a disfavored class.


Edited by NW Ponderer (02/09/12 11:55 PM)
Edit Reason: Add Quotations
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#212498 - 02/10/12 12:33 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: Phil Hoskins]
Ken Condon Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/13/07
Posts: 2908
Loc: Eugene, OR
Quote:
Ken, I write prenups and estate plans for my clients, fyi

I am aware of that. It was just designed to be a good natured poke at you.

On the other hand awhile ago we knew a gal whose father was an estate lawyer and he managed to die intestate. It was a can of worms that took the family years to unravel and about did in his spouse. Perhaps that was his intention--who knows.
_________________________
The past is always tense, the future perfect.

Top
#212502 - 02/10/12 01:02 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
veteran

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 11799
I I had been drafting estate plans for over a dozen years before I could convince my wife, also a lawyer, to draft hers.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#213860 - 02/23/12 08:00 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
veteran

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 11799
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3

Who's Online
0 registered (), 17 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2