Current Topics
Divorce - American Style
by NW Ponderer
0 seconds ago
Trump supporter shoots up DC pizza investigating Hillary Clinton child sex ring
by NW Ponderer
6 minutes 29 seconds ago
Trump Forum
by NW Ponderer
11 minutes 1 second ago
Sous vide cooking...
by TatumAH
12 minutes 4 seconds ago
Is Devin Nunes Kompromised?
by TatumAH
14 minutes 49 seconds ago
Maher Clashes with Panel on Islamic Terrorism: ‘Are There Christian Terrorist Ar
by TatumAH
Today at 03:18 AM
GOP at war with itself on health care
by pondering_it_all
Today at 02:24 AM
Trump's "Mean Budget" Demonstrates Profound Ignorance of Governing
by matthew
Yesterday at 09:56 PM
Trump and Russia
by Ujest Shurly
Yesterday at 03:29 PM
Next Trump Clusterfork: Tax Reform
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 03:27 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by TatumAH
03/24/17 09:47 PM
Reader Rant Roundtable for March 2017
by pdx rick
03/24/17 06:26 PM
A 3 billion solar mass black hole rockets out of a galaxy
by rporter314
03/24/17 05:20 PM
A Farewell to Douchebags 2006
by TatumAH
03/24/17 05:15 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by Golem
03/24/17 05:09 PM
Forum Stats
6219 Members
57 Forums
15814 Topics
273426 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#212430 - 02/09/12 10:59 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14995
BTW, in case anyone wants to read it: PERRY v. BROWN
Quote:
Whether under the Constitution same-sex couples may ever be denied the right to marry, a right that has long been enjoyed by opposite-sex couples, is an important and highly controversial question. It is currently a matter of great debate in our nation, and an issue over which people of good will may disagree, sometimes strongly. Of course, when questions of constitutional law are necessary to the resolution of a case, courts may not and should not abstain from deciding them simply because they are controversial. We need not and do not answer the broader question in this case, however, because California had already extended to committed same-sex couples both the incidents of marriage and the official designation of ‘marriage,’ and Proposition 8's only effect was to take away that important and legally significant designation, while leaving in place all of its incidents. This unique and strictly limited effect of Proposition 8 allows us to address the amendment's constitutionality on narrow grounds.
and
Quote:
By using their initiative power to target a minority group and withdraw a right that it possessed, without a legitimate reason for doing so, the People of California violated the Equal Protection Clause. We hold Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional on this ground. We do not doubt the importance of the more general questions presented to us concerning the rights of same-sex couples to marry, nor do we doubt that these questions will likely be resolved in other states, and for the nation as a whole, by other courts. For now, it suffices to conclude that the People of California may not, consistent with the Federal Constitution, add to their state constitution a provision that has no more practical effect than to strip gays and lesbians of their right to use the official designation that the State and society give to committed relationships, thereby adversely affecting the status and dignity of the members of a disfavored class.


Edited by NW Ponderer (02/10/12 04:55 AM)
Edit Reason: Add Quotations
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#212498 - 02/10/12 05:33 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: Phil Hoskins]
Ken Condon Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/14/07
Posts: 3648
Loc: Eugene, OR
Quote:
Ken, I write prenups and estate plans for my clients, fyi

I am aware of that. It was just designed to be a good natured poke at you.

On the other hand awhile ago we knew a gal whose father was an estate lawyer and he managed to die intestate. It was a can of worms that took the family years to unravel and about did in his spouse. Perhaps that was his intention--who knows.
_________________________
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.

Top
#212502 - 02/10/12 06:02 PM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14995
I I had been drafting estate plans for over a dozen years before I could convince my wife, also a lawyer, to draft hers.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#213860 - 02/24/12 01:00 AM Re: Gay Marriage Tipping Point? [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14995
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3

Who's Online
1 registered (TatumAH), 74 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
ojixadybi, tjgraylaw, AndyEmisa, lubluodPix, EugeneHag
6219 Registered Users
A2