Current Topics
Round Table for July 27-August 2, 2014
by california rick
Today at 12:46 AM
Zionism and ethnic cleansing.
by Schlack
Yesterday at 04:38 PM
Palestine after Rome and before wwi
by Ardy
Yesterday at 11:40 AM
palestinian responsibility for the Jewish Diaspora?
by Phil Hoskins
Yesterday at 11:37 AM
Libya a failure of foreign policy
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 11:35 AM
Help me understand
by Ma_Republican
Yesterday at 11:20 AM
Spiritual But Not Religious
by Spag-hetti
07/28/14 06:08 PM
State sees surge in high-paying white-collar jobs
by NW Ponderer
07/28/14 08:39 AM
Time Travel Question: Kill Hitler or educate voters on the 2000 FL ballot
by california rick
07/27/14 12:39 PM
Round Table Foe Week Of July 20th-July 26th, 2014
by Scoutgal
07/27/14 10:08 AM
Passing out weapons as a foreign policy
by california rick
07/26/14 12:14 PM
Impeachment Circus Rides Again
by california rick
07/26/14 12:12 PM
Big brother is watching
by Joe Keegan
07/26/14 12:16 AM
Illegal immigration rates
by NW Ponderer
07/24/14 07:56 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by logtroll
07/24/14 01:28 PM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14220 Topics
246517 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Topic Options
#261607 - 08/29/13 06:03 PM Syria
Schlack Offline
veteran

Registered: 07/22/04
Posts: 9551
Loc: Ireland
_________________________
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)


Top
#261608 - 08/29/13 06:32 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Schlack Offline
veteran

Registered: 07/22/04
Posts: 9551
Loc: Ireland
Holy shite

David Cameron loses Commons vote on Syria action

Quote:
British MPs have voted to reject possible military action against the Assad regime in Syria to deter the use of chemical weapons.

A government motion was defeated by 285 to 272, a majority of 13 votes.

Prime Minster David Cameron said it was clear Parliament does not want action and "the government will act accordingly".

It effectively rules out British involvement in any US-led strikes against the Assad regime.

And it comes as a potential blow to the authority of David Cameron, who had already watered down a government motion proposing military action, in response to the opposition Labour Party's demands for more evidence of Assad's guilt.
_________________________
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)


Top
#261611 - 08/29/13 07:16 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Scoutgal Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 01/23/01
Posts: 25791
Loc: CA USA
Hopefully, America follows suit!
_________________________
milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.





Top
#261612 - 08/29/13 08:42 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Irked Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 12/14/05
Posts: 3319
Loc: Somewhere out in left field
You may get what you want. Since Obama is for intervention, the House will most assuredly be against.

Can the Usurper go so far as to deliberately ignore Congress when it comes to waging war? Patriotic Americans will oppose the administration's policy on the grounds that it is too timid and, rather, a concerted effort must be made to bring Peace to the Middle East as a whole and not just Syria, but Egypt, Iraq, Libya and beyond. Freedom-loving Americans will oppose the administration's policy as not our business or a waste of money or immoral or a contrived diversion or any combination there of.

This administration must be fought at every turn. True Americans will fight for what's Right on every policy.
_________________________
How eager they are to be slaves - Tiberus Caesar

Coulda tripped out easy, but I've changed my ways - Donovan

I consider myself to be a laid back type and quite tolerant on most issues - AB Breivik

Top
#261613 - 08/29/13 08:42 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Ken Condon Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/13/07
Posts: 2881
Loc: Eugene, OR
I was a wonderin' about that. Let’s say Assad carpet bombed some fellow countrymen somewhere in Syria. Would that have been ok? No “red line” crossed. So far, if the numbers are to be believed, over 100k Syrians have been killed in this recent conflict.

Would reducing a group of people to chunks of hamburger be ok?- but if they were killed by chemical weapons that somehow is worse. They are more dead? Or wounded? And red lined crossed?

I need some help with this one.
_________________________
The past is always tense, the future perfect.

Top
#261614 - 08/29/13 08:51 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11522
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Yeah, I have no clue what to do... it seems like lots of bad options
_________________________

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts."

Top
#261615 - 08/29/13 09:07 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 4790
Loc: Highlands, Tx
interesting ... i guess it opens up the broader question but i'll leave that to the reader
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#261642 - 08/30/13 05:43 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 10485
Loc: Downey, California
Has ANYBODY here managed to figure out which group would benefit from a US strike, aside from the weapons manufacturers, that is?
_________________________
"Our options for change range from basically what we have plus a little more Hayek,
to what we have plus a little more Keynes. Why?"

---Benjamin Bratton

Top
#261643 - 08/30/13 07:27 PM Re: Syria [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Ken Condon Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 06/13/07
Posts: 2881
Loc: Eugene, OR
Quote:
which group would benefit from a US strike,


1> Certain oil producers

2> Ess-rah-ee'-lez as they are pronounced in that area.

3>Hezbollah-mebbe.

4> And last but not least- Mr. Obama for proving he is not a wimp. He can blow up stuff upon command.
_________________________
The past is always tense, the future perfect.

Top
#261644 - 08/30/13 08:02 PM Re: Syria [Re: Schlack]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 10485
Loc: Downey, California
And there you have it, this is who we're fighting for:

1. BP and Shell Oil
2. Israel, specifically Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud faction
3. The PARTY OF GOD, on BOTH sides of the water
4. Mr. Obama's shrunken sense of manhood
_________________________
"Our options for change range from basically what we have plus a little more Hayek,
to what we have plus a little more Keynes. Why?"

---Benjamin Bratton

Top
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 25 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2