Current Topics
Help me understand
by Ardy
10:17 PM
Passing out weapons as a foreign policy
by california rick
09:27 PM
Round Table for July 27-August 2, 2014
by Scoutgal
08:50 PM
Libya a failure of foreign policy
by jgw
04:09 PM
Israel. Specious arguments wearing thin
by california rick
10:56 PM
Big brother is watching
by Joe Keegan
10:55 PM
Zionism and ethnic cleansing.
by Schlack
07/29/14 04:38 PM
Palestine after Rome and before wwi
by Ardy
07/29/14 11:40 AM
palestinian responsibility for the Jewish Diaspora?
by Phil Hoskins
07/29/14 11:37 AM
Spiritual But Not Religious
by Spag-hetti
07/28/14 06:08 PM
State sees surge in high-paying white-collar jobs
by NW Ponderer
07/28/14 08:39 AM
Time Travel Question: Kill Hitler or educate voters on the 2000 FL ballot
by california rick
07/27/14 12:39 PM
Round Table Foe Week Of July 20th-July 26th, 2014
by Scoutgal
07/27/14 10:08 AM
Impeachment Circus Rides Again
by california rick
07/26/14 12:12 PM
Illegal immigration rates
by NW Ponderer
07/24/14 07:56 PM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14221 Topics
246554 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267035 - 12/29/13 09:31 AM Why didn't George Z stick with a SYG defense?
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6142
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Was SYG not applicable? (he did claim that TM was endangering his life so he shot him.)

He got off on self-defense, so what use was the SYG law?

His behavior was arguably "not responsible" in that he pursued TM against the advice of the police dispatcher; so neither SYG, nor the self-defense law proved to be stimulus for acting responsibly. "Duty to retreat" does appear to be a stimulus for acting responsibly, in the form of acting to de-escalate rather that escalate a situation. "Standing your ground", if there is an opportunity to retreat, is a form of escalation... is SYG really just an expression of testosterone, substituting a gun for a private piece of male anatomy?

Was George Z "defending his castle" (mobile version, no duty to retreat, not even any duty to not pursue...)?

I find this thing of finding excuses for shooting unarmed people to be very difficult to understand. (That was an opening for Isso to find agreement with my self-assessment of low intelligence. However, I am smart enough to not be packing' and looking for ground to stand on with me trusty shooting' iron.)
_________________________
"If you would make a person happy, add not to their possessions but take from their desires"
Unknown

Top
#267036 - 12/29/13 10:04 AM Re: Why didn't George Z stick with a SYG defense? [Re: logtroll]
california rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 35961
Loc: Bay Area, California

It is true that GZ did not use SYG in his defense. However, the Judge gave the jury instructions to use SYG and that's how GZ got off.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#267052 - 12/29/13 04:25 PM Re: Why didn't George Z stick with a SYG defense? [Re: logtroll]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Was SYG not applicable? (he did claim that TM was endangering his life so he shot him.)

He got off on self-defense, so what use was the SYG law?


In the case of Zimmerman, SYG was irrelevant because he was pinned to the ground and in no position to flee. Since "stand your ground" provides protection against any duty to retreat when certain conditions are met, and retreat was not possible according to the evidence presented, a standard self-defense strategy was more than adequate. In cases where retreat was possible, but not taken, it would then be useful to the defense -- or, so I would think.
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
#267053 - 12/29/13 04:37 PM Re: Why didn't George Z stick with a SYG defense? [Re: california rick]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
Originally Posted By: california rick

It is true that GZ did not use SYG in his defense. However, the Judge gave the jury instructions to use SYG and that's how GZ got off.


As I understand it, rick, that is a part of the standard instructions given to jurors in self-defense cases in Florida. They are free to determine it's applicability, as well as the applicability of a number of other instructions, drawing their ultimate conclusion based on the evidence presented in the trial. At no point before or during the trial was "Stand Your Ground" used by the defense as a defense or as a basis and support for invoking a demand for immunity. He walked based on plain ol' self-defense law.
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
#267062 - 12/29/13 07:27 PM Re: Why didn't George Z stick with a SYG defense? [Re: issodhos]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6142
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
So what reason is there for the SYG law? (I'm not going to ask more than ten times...)
_________________________
"If you would make a person happy, add not to their possessions but take from their desires"
Unknown

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 21 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2