Current Topics
TEXT: Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act: SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 101
by NW Ponderer
15 minutes 21 seconds ago
Australian comedian on guns
by Scoutgal
Today at 02:37 PM
Upset by Warren, U.S. banks debate halting some campaign donations
by pdx rick
Today at 01:40 PM
Indiana Is A Great Place To Be A Bigot
by Scoutgal
Today at 10:18 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Defending Darwin
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 09:12 PM
Round Table For The Month Of March, 2015
by logtroll
Yesterday at 02:51 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2015
by Golem
Yesterday at 01:10 PM
California lawyer seeks to put 'shoot the gays' proposal on 2016 ballot
by pdx rick
03/27/15 11:34 PM
My life with the surname 'F---'
by Golem
03/27/15 10:35 PM
The Intolerant Jackass Act
by NW Ponderer
03/27/15 08:51 PM
Amanda Knox guilty verdict overturned by Italy's highest court
by NW Ponderer
03/27/15 07:37 PM
Bowe Berdahl charged
by Greger
03/27/15 05:23 PM
Harry Reid announces his retirement.
by NW Ponderer
03/27/15 12:36 PM
Planet Fitness sued by former member over transgender locker room issue
by NW Ponderer
03/27/15 11:57 AM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14690 Topics
251243 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#267040 - 12/29/13 11:26 AM SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11973
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Again, I am trying to quickly and succinctly frame the question here. As such we may need to adjust the topic based on the precise inputs of others ranters.


Edited by Ardy (12/29/13 11:27 AM)
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267041 - 12/29/13 11:29 AM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11973
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Transferring comments from a previous thread to this new one for discussion

Originally Posted By: issodhos

SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267042 - 12/29/13 11:34 AM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11973
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

So we need to discuss what that is, if that goal is met by the laws, and whether that goal trumps all the potential and real blow-back implications.

I feel there are many points for discussion in the above, but would not want to pre-empt a precise clarification of what are the issues at hand.


Edited by Ardy (12/29/13 11:36 AM)
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267045 - 12/29/13 12:03 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6722
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: Ardy

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

Seems like precisely defining "justifiable" as "fearing that someone is going to cause me great harm" is trending in the direction of less precise, rather than more precise. As I recollect, "fearing" is the key element in justification of "throwing a gun" (Zane Grey colloquialism) on somebody.

In addition, the one outstanding lack in the Florida SYG law was that there was no blowback for mistakenly throwing a gun on an person who was not posing a real threat, as opposed to a feared threat. This little fact nearly eliminates the "responsibility" clause associated with SYG that was claimed by our friend Isser.


Edited by logtroll (12/29/13 12:22 PM)
Edit Reason: clean up
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267046 - 12/29/13 12:17 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: logtroll]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 36721
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Originally Posted By: Ardy

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

Seems like precisely defining "justifiable" as "fearing that someone is going to cause me great harm" is trending in the direction of less precise, rather than more precise. As I recollect, "fearing" is the key element in justification of "throwing a gun" (Zane Grey colloquialism) on somebody.

In addition, the one outstanding lack in the Florida SYG law was that there was no blowback for mistakenly throwing a gun on an person who was not posing a real threat, as opposed to a feared threat. This little fact nearly eliminates the "responsibility" clause associated with SYG that was claimed by our friend Isser. associatewith SYG

That's Flor-i-duh logic for you. Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#267047 - 12/29/13 12:19 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11973
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267048 - 12/29/13 01:00 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6722
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: Ardy
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?
That was my understanding of the Florida SYG law back when the GZ issue was hot. Simple math... the survivor has a reasonable belief to kill = justification. (That's not pure math, 'cause I used mostly words)
Quote:
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.óA person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the otherís imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.

If the other person is dead, and there were no witnesses, and the killer can present a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary, then Bob's yer uncle.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267049 - 12/29/13 02:11 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 36721
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: Ardy
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?

Only if the shooter is white and the victim is black.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#267050 - 12/29/13 03:35 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: logtroll]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11973
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Originally Posted By: logtroll

If the other person is dead, and there were no witnesses, and the killer can present a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary, then Bob's yer uncle.


Well, if we assume that SYG laws are a mere expansion of castle doctrine, then I guess you have to have the same logic....

which in many cases is that if someone is in your house, you have presumptive fear for your life.... end of story.

I suppose it makes some sense inside the castle.... although many states disagree on this point. But once you put it outside the castle, it appears that SYB can be claimed in most any confrontation. And the application is presumptive unless there is proof that there was no justification. A proof that in many cases is quite difficult..... regardless of the actual threat
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267055 - 12/29/13 04:59 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
Originally Posted By: Ardy


[quote=issodhos]
SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."
Yours,
Issodhos


Giving credit where credit is due, Ardy, that is a part of a quote from C.J. -- a sentiment with which I agree. He wrote, "Iíll combine it to legally logical and say that SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."

I am assuming that by, "To protect the justified", C.J. is referring to strengthening the legal position of the individual who meets the criteria for having justifiably used lethal force -- either by providing a basis for invoking immunity from prosecution and civil actions prior to trial, or using it as an affirmative defense during trial. Of course, I cannot speak definitively for C.J., but that is my interpretation of what he meant. He will correct me if I am mistaken.
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
1 registered (Jeffery J. Haas), 11 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2