Current Topics
Islamic Terror and Reckless Rhetoric on the Far Right
by SJGulitti
34 minutes 10 seconds ago
Bruce Jenner: 'I'm a Woman'
by pondering_it_all
Today at 02:35 PM
Conservative spin: the opposite of reality
by Greger
Yesterday at 05:22 PM
Poll: Is it time to retire Junipero Serra's statue?
by pdx rick
04/25/15 03:32 PM
Rotund Table for the Moth of April, 2014
by pdx rick
04/25/15 12:37 AM
The Middle East
by Greger
04/24/15 08:23 PM
Embryonic Twin Discovered in Woman's Brain During Surgery in LA
by pondering_it_all
04/24/15 06:41 PM
Video Shows Woman Arguing With Agents Before Her Phone is Smashed
by NW Ponderer
04/24/15 12:47 AM
Sarah Palin: Stuff That Copywright Infringement Genie Back in the Bottle
by Scoutgal
04/23/15 02:44 PM
tea party?
by pdx rick
04/23/15 12:24 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
04/23/15 12:07 PM
Super Dave grounded due to noise complaints
by Ken Condon
04/22/15 11:48 PM
Robert Bates' Excellent Urban Safari
by Spag-hetti
04/22/15 11:13 PM
BREAKING: Star Trek XIII to be titled ‘Star Trek Beyond’
by Golem
04/22/15 05:31 PM
Hey! Senator Cruz! Are you for armed visitors in the Senate and House?
by Spag-hetti
04/22/15 09:09 AM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14730 Topics
251635 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#267040 - 12/29/13 11:26 AM SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11987
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Again, I am trying to quickly and succinctly frame the question here. As such we may need to adjust the topic based on the precise inputs of others ranters.


Edited by Ardy (12/29/13 11:27 AM)
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267041 - 12/29/13 11:29 AM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11987
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Transferring comments from a previous thread to this new one for discussion

Originally Posted By: issodhos

SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267042 - 12/29/13 11:34 AM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11987
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

So we need to discuss what that is, if that goal is met by the laws, and whether that goal trumps all the potential and real blow-back implications.

I feel there are many points for discussion in the above, but would not want to pre-empt a precise clarification of what are the issues at hand.


Edited by Ardy (12/29/13 11:36 AM)
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267045 - 12/29/13 12:03 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6757
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: Ardy

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

Seems like precisely defining "justifiable" as "fearing that someone is going to cause me great harm" is trending in the direction of less precise, rather than more precise. As I recollect, "fearing" is the key element in justification of "throwing a gun" (Zane Grey colloquialism) on somebody.

In addition, the one outstanding lack in the Florida SYG law was that there was no blowback for mistakenly throwing a gun on an person who was not posing a real threat, as opposed to a feared threat. This little fact nearly eliminates the "responsibility" clause associated with SYG that was claimed by our friend Isser.


Edited by logtroll (12/29/13 12:22 PM)
Edit Reason: clean up
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267046 - 12/29/13 12:17 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: logtroll]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 36797
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Originally Posted By: Ardy

So will the precise among us agree that the focus is upon the concept of "justifiable"

Seems like precisely defining "justifiable" as "fearing that someone is going to cause me great harm" is trending in the direction of less precise, rather than more precise. As I recollect, "fearing" is the key element in justification of "throwing a gun" (Zane Grey colloquialism) on somebody.

In addition, the one outstanding lack in the Florida SYG law was that there was no blowback for mistakenly throwing a gun on an person who was not posing a real threat, as opposed to a feared threat. This little fact nearly eliminates the "responsibility" clause associated with SYG that was claimed by our friend Isser. associatewith SYG

That's Flor-i-duh logic for you. Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#267047 - 12/29/13 12:19 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11987
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267048 - 12/29/13 01:00 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6757
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: Ardy
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?
That was my understanding of the Florida SYG law back when the GZ issue was hot. Simple math... the survivor has a reasonable belief to kill = justification. (That's not pure math, 'cause I used mostly words)
Quote:
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.

If the other person is dead, and there were no witnesses, and the killer can present a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary, then Bob's yer uncle.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267049 - 12/29/13 02:11 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 36797
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: Ardy
So there is the first question. How do we detirmine "justified?"

If two people walk into the woods and one is killed, and the killer claims it was a justified kill, does syg offer him immunity?

Only if the shooter is white and the victim is black.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#267050 - 12/29/13 03:35 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: logtroll]
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11987
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
Originally Posted By: logtroll

If the other person is dead, and there were no witnesses, and the killer can present a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary, then Bob's yer uncle.


Well, if we assume that SYG laws are a mere expansion of castle doctrine, then I guess you have to have the same logic....

which in many cases is that if someone is in your house, you have presumptive fear for your life.... end of story.

I suppose it makes some sense inside the castle.... although many states disagree on this point. But once you put it outside the castle, it appears that SYB can be claimed in most any confrontation. And the application is presumptive unless there is proof that there was no justification. A proof that in many cases is quite difficult..... regardless of the actual threat
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267055 - 12/29/13 04:59 PM Re: SYG: Intent, effectiveness, and blowback [Re: Ardy]
issodhos Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 12581
Originally Posted By: Ardy


[quote=issodhos]
SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."
Yours,
Issodhos


Giving credit where credit is due, Ardy, that is a part of a quote from C.J. -- a sentiment with which I agree. He wrote, "I’ll combine it to legally logical and say that SYG laws are generally constructed with two things in mind. 1) To protect the Justified and 2) Not provide an excuse for someone who unjustifiably uses deadly force."

I am assuming that by, "To protect the justified", C.J. is referring to strengthening the legal position of the individual who meets the criteria for having justifiably used lethal force -- either by providing a basis for invoking immunity from prosecution and civil actions prior to trial, or using it as an affirmative defense during trial. Of course, I cannot speak definitively for C.J., but that is my interpretation of what he meant. He will correct me if I am mistaken.
Yours,
Issodhos
_________________________
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 12 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2