Current Topics
Solid Job Growth Strengthens Prospect for a Fed Rate Increase
by rporter314
Extreme Confirmation Bias in a Post-Truth World
by pdx rick
08:25 PM
Global warming
by Ezekiel
07:59 PM
Reader Rant Rounddtable for December 2016
by pdx rick
06:22 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
09:04 PM
Agroecology
by logtroll
08:04 PM
Not-capitalism; the commons
by logtroll
02:49 PM
Well Brexit is going well .....
by Jeffery J. Haas
02:25 PM
Reader Rant Roundtable for November 2016
by NW Ponderer
03:24 AM
Legions of Squishy Sea Things Wash Up on Sea Shore
by Golem
01:26 AM
Photoshop for voices
by Jeffery J. Haas
11/30/16 08:57 PM
Universal Basic Income? Guaranteed Job?
by pondering_it_all
11/30/16 08:25 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2016
by Golem
11/30/16 05:44 PM
Worst Case Scenario
by NW Ponderer
11/30/16 03:05 PM
Capitalism: A Ponzi Scheme?
by logtroll
11/30/16 02:16 PM
Forum Stats
6198 Members
57 Forums
15603 Topics
270385 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267335 - 01/07/14 09:17 PM Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason
Golem Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 03/12/12
Posts: 3287
Loc: Orange County, California, USA
Cliff Corcoran
Sports Illustrated
January 7, 2014

Quote:
No player has ever been elected unanimously to the Hall of Fame and four-time Cy Young winner Greg Maddux, the most obvious of the many deserving candidates on this year's ballot, won't be the first. We now know that for sure thanks to MLB.com's commendable tradition of posting its writers' ballots the day before the results are announced. There are 17 MLB.com writers who have been members of the Baseball Writers Association of America for 10 or more years and thus are eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. Sixteen of them voted for Maddux. Dodgers beat reporter Ken Gurnick did not.

Why not? Gurnick wrote that he won't vote for any player who "played during the period of PED use." Not one. So who was on his ballot? Just Jack Morris.

More

How MLB.com writers voted in Hall of Fame balloting

Top
#267348 - 01/08/14 03:02 AM Re: Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason [Re: Golem]
loganrbt Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/20/08
Posts: 5850
Loc: Massaphuggintwoshirts
Greg Maddux was a great pitcher, richly deserves selection to all manner of recognition. But he is not as great a ball player as many of those already enshrined in the self-proclaimed Hall of Fame, who were denied unanimous selection for far less honorable reasons.

Frankly, the big surprise to me in your post above is that there is a voter who has sufficient concern about the reputation of the game to put an embargo on the entire period of disregard about PED! Would far more prefer him to take such a position than to vote for known users of said drugs. And if Greg is denied a unanimous ballot, he can join Ted Williams, Hank Aaron, and Tom Seaver in that line. I say, "bully for Gurnick" for showing some hint of a moral position in a profession and a sport which to date has limited itself to banning Pete Rose. At least Maddux gets to be on the ballot. As did the 'roid boys.
_________________________
"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
MainStreetMentor, Stephenapalk, MatthesFluig, AngelinaBE, Cedric
6198 Registered Users
A2