Current Topics
Trump's Trumpet
by rporter314
0 seconds ago
The men who live as dogs: 'We're just the same as any person on the high street'
by Greger
Today at 12:24 AM
Campaign 2016
by rporter314
Yesterday at 03:55 PM
Were the 1950s the Golden Age of Science Fiction Cinema?
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:35 PM
The Secret History Of Isis
by pdx rick
05/25/16 09:41 PM
Saudi Arabia
by matthew
05/25/16 09:20 PM
Let's check in on the cattle abusers, deadbeat grazers, wildlife squatter Bundys
by pdx rick
05/25/16 07:20 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
05/25/16 01:36 PM
Round Table for May, 2016
by HalBrown
05/24/16 06:56 PM
Restaurant owner found guilty of death by chicken tikka masala
by pondering_it_all
05/24/16 06:20 PM
Political Re-Alignment
by jgw
05/24/16 03:44 PM
Foster v. Chatman
by pdx rick
05/24/16 12:34 PM
Blogger beware: Postings can lead to lawsuits
by Jeffery J. Haas
05/24/16 11:55 AM
Fast-growing U.S. movement armed with guns and the Constitution sees dire threat
by pdx rick
05/23/16 04:06 PM
Killer Nile crocodiles in Florida? Experts say it's possible
by pondering_it_all
05/23/16 03:56 AM
Forum Stats
6151 Members
56 Forums
15252 Topics
261720 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267335 - 01/07/14 04:17 PM Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason
Golem Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 03/12/12
Posts: 3032
Loc: Orange County, California, USA
Cliff Corcoran
Sports Illustrated
January 7, 2014

Quote:
No player has ever been elected unanimously to the Hall of Fame and four-time Cy Young winner Greg Maddux, the most obvious of the many deserving candidates on this year's ballot, won't be the first. We now know that for sure thanks to MLB.com's commendable tradition of posting its writers' ballots the day before the results are announced. There are 17 MLB.com writers who have been members of the Baseball Writers Association of America for 10 or more years and thus are eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. Sixteen of them voted for Maddux. Dodgers beat reporter Ken Gurnick did not.

Why not? Gurnick wrote that he won't vote for any player who "played during the period of PED use." Not one. So who was on his ballot? Just Jack Morris.

More

How MLB.com writers voted in Hall of Fame balloting

Top
#267348 - 01/07/14 10:02 PM Re: Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason [Re: Golem]
loganrbt Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/20/08
Posts: 5850
Loc: Massaphuggintwoshirts
Greg Maddux was a great pitcher, richly deserves selection to all manner of recognition. But he is not as great a ball player as many of those already enshrined in the self-proclaimed Hall of Fame, who were denied unanimous selection for far less honorable reasons.

Frankly, the big surprise to me in your post above is that there is a voter who has sufficient concern about the reputation of the game to put an embargo on the entire period of disregard about PED! Would far more prefer him to take such a position than to vote for known users of said drugs. And if Greg is denied a unanimous ballot, he can join Ted Williams, Hank Aaron, and Tom Seaver in that line. I say, "bully for Gurnick" for showing some hint of a moral position in a profession and a sport which to date has limited itself to banning Pete Rose. At least Maddux gets to be on the ballot. As did the 'roid boys.
_________________________
"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
aqopi, PhillipEscavy, kongcheng, Kennethben, Andrewbelo
6151 Registered Users
A2