Current Topics
It is finally over? Polls say yes
by pdx rick
0 seconds ago
What does the United States Stand For?
by NW Ponderer
Today at 10:38 AM
Can Trump the brand survive Trump the man?
by Ezekiel
Today at 10:36 AM
Campaign 2016
by Ezekiel
Today at 10:35 AM
Trump's Trumpet
by Ezekiel
Today at 10:30 AM
by NW Ponderer
Today at 10:29 AM
Donald Trump has turned to scorched-earth campaigning
by Ezekiel
Today at 10:22 AM
North Carolina county GOP office attacked; Trump blames 'animals'
by logtroll
Today at 07:55 AM
A fix for the SSTF
by Ezekiel
Today at 07:16 AM
Whoa: Has the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle just been solved?
by Golem
Yesterday at 10:23 PM
The funniest meme of this election cycle
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 07:37 PM
Hedge Funds Hurt as Investors Remove $28 Billion in 3 Months
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 05:35 PM
Rountable for Oktober 2016
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 04:23 AM
Republicans plan to continue SCOTUS nominee blockade
by matthew
10/20/16 09:39 PM
Poll: Who won the October 19, 2016 final presidential debate?
by Golem
10/20/16 03:05 PM
Forum Stats
6181 Members
56 Forums
15495 Topics
267953 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267335 - 01/07/14 04:17 PM Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason
Golem Offline

Registered: 03/12/12
Posts: 3207
Loc: Orange County, California, USA
Cliff Corcoran
Sports Illustrated
January 7, 2014

No player has ever been elected unanimously to the Hall of Fame and four-time Cy Young winner Greg Maddux, the most obvious of the many deserving candidates on this year's ballot, won't be the first. We now know that for sure thanks to's commendable tradition of posting its writers' ballots the day before the results are announced. There are 17 writers who have been members of the Baseball Writers Association of America for 10 or more years and thus are eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. Sixteen of them voted for Maddux. Dodgers beat reporter Ken Gurnick did not.

Why not? Gurnick wrote that he won't vote for any player who "played during the period of PED use." Not one. So who was on his ballot? Just Jack Morris.


How writers voted in Hall of Fame balloting

#267348 - 01/07/14 10:02 PM Re: Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason [Re: Golem]
loganrbt Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/20/08
Posts: 5850
Loc: Massaphuggintwoshirts
Greg Maddux was a great pitcher, richly deserves selection to all manner of recognition. But he is not as great a ball player as many of those already enshrined in the self-proclaimed Hall of Fame, who were denied unanimous selection for far less honorable reasons.

Frankly, the big surprise to me in your post above is that there is a voter who has sufficient concern about the reputation of the game to put an embargo on the entire period of disregard about PED! Would far more prefer him to take such a position than to vote for known users of said drugs. And if Greg is denied a unanimous ballot, he can join Ted Williams, Hank Aaron, and Tom Seaver in that line. I say, "bully for Gurnick" for showing some hint of a moral position in a profession and a sport which to date has limited itself to banning Pete Rose. At least Maddux gets to be on the ballot. As did the 'roid boys.
"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown


Who's Online
1 registered (Greger), 28 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
mnopqr222369, Ujest Shurly, stuvwx896634, besstty, SyslexDan
6181 Registered Users