Current Topics
Data shows majority does not rule in the US it is the rich and special interests
by Ardy
Today at 02:40 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2014
by Golem
Yesterday at 03:32 PM
Was Robert E. Lee a patriot or a traitor?
by logtroll
Yesterday at 03:25 PM
Two for Easter
by Golem
Yesterday at 02:00 PM
Round Table For April 20th-April 26th, 2014
by Scoutgal
Yesterday at 01:13 PM
Militias ‘mobilizing’ to support embattled Clark County rancher
by california rick
Yesterday at 11:37 AM
Animals with Human Rights Make Researchers Run Scared
by Ardy
04/19/14 07:30 PM
The New American Center: Why our nation isn't as divided as we think
by Ardy
04/19/14 07:13 PM
Hank Aaron and the continuing pain of racism
by california rick
04/19/14 06:14 PM
Bullying has negative impacts that last decades after childhood
by logtroll
04/19/14 10:02 AM
Fargo (TV series)
by Phil Hoskins
04/18/14 11:01 PM
Round Table For Week Of April 13th-April 19th, 2014
by Scoutgal
04/18/14 07:29 PM
Chick-fil-A Looks to Lower the Heat on Gay Marriage
by Spag-hetti
04/18/14 09:09 AM
Ukraine
by Ardy
04/18/14 01:57 AM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14007 Topics
243719 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267335 - 01/07/14 04:17 PM Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason
Golem Offline
member

Registered: 03/12/12
Posts: 1874
Loc: Orange County, California, USA
Cliff Corcoran
Sports Illustrated
January 7, 2014

Quote:
No player has ever been elected unanimously to the Hall of Fame and four-time Cy Young winner Greg Maddux, the most obvious of the many deserving candidates on this year's ballot, won't be the first. We now know that for sure thanks to MLB.com's commendable tradition of posting its writers' ballots the day before the results are announced. There are 17 MLB.com writers who have been members of the Baseball Writers Association of America for 10 or more years and thus are eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. Sixteen of them voted for Maddux. Dodgers beat reporter Ken Gurnick did not.

Why not? Gurnick wrote that he won't vote for any player who "played during the period of PED use." Not one. So who was on his ballot? Just Jack Morris.

More

How MLB.com writers voted in Hall of Fame balloting

Top
#267348 - 01/07/14 10:02 PM Re: Greg Maddux won't be a unanimous Hall of Famer for an incredibly stupid reason [Re: Golem]
loganrbt Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/20/08
Posts: 5844
Loc: Massaphuggintwoshirts
Greg Maddux was a great pitcher, richly deserves selection to all manner of recognition. But he is not as great a ball player as many of those already enshrined in the self-proclaimed Hall of Fame, who were denied unanimous selection for far less honorable reasons.

Frankly, the big surprise to me in your post above is that there is a voter who has sufficient concern about the reputation of the game to put an embargo on the entire period of disregard about PED! Would far more prefer him to take such a position than to vote for known users of said drugs. And if Greg is denied a unanimous ballot, he can join Ted Williams, Hank Aaron, and Tom Seaver in that line. I say, "bully for Gurnick" for showing some hint of a moral position in a profession and a sport which to date has limited itself to banning Pete Rose. At least Maddux gets to be on the ballot. As did the 'roid boys.
_________________________
"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 13 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2