Current Topics
Jeb ‘Put Me Through Hell’
by Greger
35 minutes 46 seconds ago
More on cops
by logtroll
Today at 03:18 PM
The Myth of the Gay Community
by Ardy
Today at 02:27 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
Today at 02:04 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2015
by Golem
Today at 12:13 PM
Mitt Romney closes door on 2016 run
by pdx rick
Today at 12:05 PM
Round Table for January 2015!
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 08:58 PM
Koch Brothers Primary?
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 07:35 PM
NFL - the league that can't shoot straight
by logtroll
Yesterday at 08:58 AM
Muslim Terrorism
by Greger
01/28/15 09:07 PM
Islamic Terror and Reckless Rhetoric on the Far Right
by SJGulitti
01/28/15 04:30 PM
• Gov. Sarah Palin • Iowa Freedom Summit • 1/24/15 •
by Spag-hetti
01/27/15 07:08 PM
Marshawn Lynch talks to the Media! Marshawn Lynch talks to the Media!
by NW Ponderer
01/27/15 03:16 PM
GOP Sharks Circling, Bottom Feeders Not Far Behind
by logtroll
01/27/15 07:55 AM
Does Jeb Bush stand a chance?
by Greger
01/26/15 10:15 PM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14560 Topics
249823 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267656 - 01/16/14 11:38 AM Why plural marriages make sense
Ardy Offline
veteran

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 11794
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
AN INTERESTING OP ED FROM CNN

Quote:
Why plural marriages make sense
cnn

As discussed in other threads, a new perceptive on relationships has spill over into gay marriage also though this guy proposes that the gov mostly gets out of the question


Edited by Ardy (01/16/14 11:43 AM)
_________________________
Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly;
Man got to sit and wonder ‘why, why, why?’
Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land;
Man got to tell himself he understand

kurt Vonnegut

Top
#267663 - 01/16/14 12:33 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 12111
Over time I have come to the same conclusion as the author. It's sometimes necessary to untangle the emotional from the rational. There is merit to "traditional" nuclear families, but that merit should not overshadow the benefits of other arrangements. They should be considered on their own merits. Multiple partners prevent straying and enhance support networks. If the goal is strong social units, let's let variety reign. It would be hard to find a more socially fragile and imperfect institution than traditional marriage. Consider that divorce rates indicate that the traditional marriage has already had it's zenith. Multiple marriage is already a norm.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267668 - 01/16/14 12:57 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: NW Ponderer]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6599
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Aren't all marriages plural?
The Smiths
The Montaignes
The Larrondos
Hmm
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
...There is merit to "traditional" nuclear families, but that merit should not overshadow the benefits of other arrangements. They should be considered on their own merits. ...

Such is the slippery slope to human-bovine marriages, human-Gila monster connuptials, even corporate mergers... where does it end?
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267692 - 01/16/14 08:46 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 12111
With consent. Until animals are deemed competent to enter contracts...
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267701 - 01/16/14 09:26 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
pondering_it_all Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 4403
Loc: North San Diego County
The Religious Right should have no trouble supporting Traditional Marriages, as outlined in the Bible.

You know, the ones where a man has some wives, some concubines, some female bond-servants or employees that can be used for sex, some female spoils-of-war-turned-slave. Of course, the whole idea of using surrogates for child-bearing is Biblical, too. And then there's your obligation to marry your sister-in-law(s) when your brother dies.

You know what I always wondered is what happens to a Jack-Mormon plural marriage after the man dies? Do all the Sister-Wives consider themselves still married to each other? Don't they need to stay together but not remarry so their big family can be reunited on that next planet or whatever? Isn't the result about the same as a lesbian same-sex marriage with children?

Top
#267702 - 01/16/14 09:28 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: pondering_it_all]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6599
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
....You know what I always wondered is what happens to a Jack-Mormon plural marriage after the man dies? ...

I believe that is all spelled out in the marriage contract. If it ain't, I'd sue the lawyer.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267714 - 01/17/14 09:52 AM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 12111
Would that suit be brought in the next life?
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267725 - 01/17/14 12:47 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: NW Ponderer]
logtroll Offline
old hand

Registered: 04/25/10
Posts: 6599
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
Would that suit be brought in the next life?
In the context presented, maybe on the next planet? Or whatever suits the suer.

Sewage: see "statute of limitations"
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 11 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2