Current Topics
Solid Job Growth Strengthens Prospect for a Fed Rate Increase
by rporter314
Extreme Confirmation Bias in a Post-Truth World
by pdx rick
08:25 PM
Global warming
by Ezekiel
07:59 PM
Reader Rant Rounddtable for December 2016
by pdx rick
06:22 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
09:04 PM
Agroecology
by logtroll
08:04 PM
Not-capitalism; the commons
by logtroll
02:49 PM
Well Brexit is going well .....
by Jeffery J. Haas
02:25 PM
Reader Rant Roundtable for November 2016
by NW Ponderer
03:24 AM
Legions of Squishy Sea Things Wash Up on Sea Shore
by Golem
01:26 AM
Photoshop for voices
by Jeffery J. Haas
11/30/16 08:57 PM
Universal Basic Income? Guaranteed Job?
by pondering_it_all
11/30/16 08:25 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2016
by Golem
11/30/16 05:44 PM
Worst Case Scenario
by NW Ponderer
11/30/16 03:05 PM
Capitalism: A Ponzi Scheme?
by logtroll
11/30/16 02:16 PM
Forum Stats
6198 Members
57 Forums
15603 Topics
270385 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#267656 - 01/16/14 04:38 PM Why plural marriages make sense
Ardy Offline
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 12/22/05
Posts: 12005
Loc: San Jose, Ca USA
AN INTERESTING OP ED FROM CNN

Quote:
Why plural marriages make sense
cnn

As discussed in other threads, a new perceptive on relationships has spill over into gay marriage also though this guy proposes that the gov mostly gets out of the question


Edited by Ardy (01/16/14 04:43 PM)
_________________________
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel

Top
#267663 - 01/16/14 05:33 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14663
Over time I have come to the same conclusion as the author. It's sometimes necessary to untangle the emotional from the rational. There is merit to "traditional" nuclear families, but that merit should not overshadow the benefits of other arrangements. They should be considered on their own merits. Multiple partners prevent straying and enhance support networks. If the goal is strong social units, let's let variety reign. It would be hard to find a more socially fragile and imperfect institution than traditional marriage. Consider that divorce rates indicate that the traditional marriage has already had it's zenith. Multiple marriage is already a norm.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267668 - 01/16/14 05:57 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: NW Ponderer]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8214
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Aren't all marriages plural?
The Smiths
The Montaignes
The Larrondos
Hmm
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
...There is merit to "traditional" nuclear families, but that merit should not overshadow the benefits of other arrangements. They should be considered on their own merits. ...

Such is the slippery slope to human-bovine marriages, human-Gila monster connuptials, even corporate mergers... where does it end?
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267692 - 01/17/14 01:46 AM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14663
With consent. Until animals are deemed competent to enter contracts...
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267701 - 01/17/14 02:26 AM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
pondering_it_all Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 6099
Loc: North San Diego County
The Religious Right should have no trouble supporting Traditional Marriages, as outlined in the Bible.

You know, the ones where a man has some wives, some concubines, some female bond-servants or employees that can be used for sex, some female spoils-of-war-turned-slave. Of course, the whole idea of using surrogates for child-bearing is Biblical, too. And then there's your obligation to marry your sister-in-law(s) when your brother dies.

You know what I always wondered is what happens to a Jack-Mormon plural marriage after the man dies? Do all the Sister-Wives consider themselves still married to each other? Don't they need to stay together but not remarry so their big family can be reunited on that next planet or whatever? Isn't the result about the same as a lesbian same-sex marriage with children?

Top
#267702 - 01/17/14 02:28 AM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: pondering_it_all]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8214
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
....You know what I always wondered is what happens to a Jack-Mormon plural marriage after the man dies? ...

I believe that is all spelled out in the marriage contract. If it ain't, I'd sue the lawyer.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#267714 - 01/17/14 02:52 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: Ardy]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 14663
Would that suit be brought in the next life?
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#267725 - 01/17/14 05:47 PM Re: Why plural marriages make sense [Re: NW Ponderer]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8214
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
Would that suit be brought in the next life?
In the context presented, maybe on the next planet? Or whatever suits the suer.

Sewage: see "statute of limitations"
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
MainStreetMentor, Stephenapalk, MatthesFluig, AngelinaBE, Cedric
6198 Registered Users
A2