Current Topics
Trump Forum
by Jeffery J. Haas
26 minutes 28 seconds ago
Big Lies and Tax Cuts
by logtroll
Today at 01:48 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
Yesterday at 06:34 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by Golem
Yesterday at 05:25 PM
Bitcoin
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 05:22 PM
Round Table for December 2017
by olyve
Yesterday at 01:32 AM
Crypto- and local currencies
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 12:22 AM
just a thought
by pondering_it_all
12/15/17 09:04 PM
speculative tv
by jgw
12/13/17 10:17 PM
sex assaults
by NW Ponderer
12/13/17 12:11 PM
Sinister sound of Tyrannosaurus Rex heard for first time in 66 million years
by Ken Condon
12/10/17 11:26 PM
Al Franken 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
12/09/17 05:33 AM
The Communication-coordi
nation-collusion-con
spiracy Continuum

by Ken Condon
12/05/17 12:07 AM
Trump and Russia
by Jeffery J. Haas
12/04/17 06:43 PM
SMOKING GUN: NRA link to Russia-Trump Campaign back-channels
by pdx rick
12/03/17 09:56 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
57 Forums
16122 Topics
277891 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#296937 - 12/03/16 09:46 PM Discussion of Rules re: political crticism
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21134
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
This is open for discussions. Please do so here and not on other threads.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top
#296967 - 12/04/16 04:29 PM Re: Discussion of Rules re: political crticism [Re: Phil Hoskins]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15574
We ARE in uncharted waters, here. Donald Trump is such a reprehensible figure and his "movement" so inherently dangerous to the United States that it begs stern commentary.

I think, though, that one of the things that RR has always stood for is a higher standard for criticism. The rule against nicknames, and disparaging remarks has been a foundation for that standard. While it is imperative to not treat Trump as "Normal" - he most assuredly is NOT - there is still room to uphold that standard and maintain constant criticism of the man, his administration, and his policies. I admit I am having a very difficult time keeping from yielding to the urge to name him the buffoon that he is.

I do think, however, that it is imperative to get ahead of this as a community so that it does not get out of hand. We need to be up front about where we are going with this, and why. We have an obligation to our community to keep all viewpoints as accessible as possible within our standards. This is a difficult task.

My sense is that maintaining our current rules is more important than the rhetorical satisfaction of naming Trump what he is. I think we can lead the way as well by considering how we broach the subject.

Those are two cents to get the discussion going. These are my preliminary thoughts. I'm open, as always, to persuasion.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#296984 - 12/04/16 06:30 PM Re: Discussion of Rules re: political crticism [Re: NW Ponderer]
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21134
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
I didn't realize this is closed so I created a new thread and copied this to that one.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 46 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2