Current Topics
3 word story game
by TatumAH
26 minutes 39 seconds ago
Sous vide cooking...
by TatumAH
32 minutes 12 seconds ago
A Greater Lawlessness
by Irked
Today at 02:30 AM
Trump and Russia
by Irked
Today at 02:26 AM
Brexit Eve
by Irked
Today at 02:19 AM
GOP at war with itself on health care
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 09:08 PM
With Obamacare repeal less likely, opponents of expansion in the states have jus
by TatumAH
Yesterday at 06:38 PM
Trump Forum
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 04:43 AM
NFL owners vote 31-1 to approve Raiders move to Las Vegas
by Irked
Yesterday at 02:04 AM
The Most Infuriating Movie Endings Of All Time
by Irked
Yesterday at 01:53 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by Golem
03/28/17 03:09 PM
What Russia's Latest Protests Mean for Putin
by TatumAH
03/28/17 05:47 AM
A Farewell to Douchebags 2006
by TatumAH
03/28/17 12:04 AM
Divorce - American Style
by TatumAH
03/27/17 04:09 PM
Why the Sunday roast is the most overrated meal in Britain
by pondering_it_all
03/27/17 10:32 AM
Forum Stats
6219 Members
57 Forums
15826 Topics
273600 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#296937 - 12/03/16 09:46 PM Discussion of Rules re: political crticism
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21114
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
This is open for discussions. Please do so here and not on other threads.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top
#296967 - 12/04/16 04:29 PM Re: Discussion of Rules re: political crticism [Re: Phil Hoskins]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15014
We ARE in uncharted waters, here. Donald Trump is such a reprehensible figure and his "movement" so inherently dangerous to the United States that it begs stern commentary.

I think, though, that one of the things that RR has always stood for is a higher standard for criticism. The rule against nicknames, and disparaging remarks has been a foundation for that standard. While it is imperative to not treat Trump as "Normal" - he most assuredly is NOT - there is still room to uphold that standard and maintain constant criticism of the man, his administration, and his policies. I admit I am having a very difficult time keeping from yielding to the urge to name him the buffoon that he is.

I do think, however, that it is imperative to get ahead of this as a community so that it does not get out of hand. We need to be up front about where we are going with this, and why. We have an obligation to our community to keep all viewpoints as accessible as possible within our standards. This is a difficult task.

My sense is that maintaining our current rules is more important than the rhetorical satisfaction of naming Trump what he is. I think we can lead the way as well by considering how we broach the subject.

Those are two cents to get the discussion going. These are my preliminary thoughts. I'm open, as always, to persuasion.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#296984 - 12/04/16 06:30 PM Re: Discussion of Rules re: political crticism [Re: NW Ponderer]
Phil Hoskins Offline
Administrator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 06/07/04
Posts: 21114
Loc: West Hollywood, CA
I didn't realize this is closed so I created a new thread and copied this to that one.
_________________________
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 43 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
ojixadybi, tjgraylaw, AndyEmisa, lubluodPix, EugeneHag
6219 Registered Users
A2