Current Topics
Charolottesville
by pondering_it_all
Today at 04:32 AM
Round Table for August 2017
by pdx rick
Today at 02:11 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by pondering_it_all
Today at 12:03 AM
NASA to Stop a Doomsday Supervolcano by Stealing its Heat
by pondering_it_all
Today at 12:00 AM
10 Plans Hitler Would Have Put In Motion If The Nazis Had Won
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 07:33 PM
Washington's farewell address
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 06:08 PM
USC mascot under scrutiny for having name similar to Robert E. Lee's horse
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:52 AM
Cultural iconography
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:28 AM
Trump Forum
by rporter314
08/18/17 10:17 PM
Hyde: Is Stanton the legit HR king if he hits 62? Even he wonders | Commentary
by Golem
08/18/17 07:00 PM
Trump resurrects tall tale about General Pershing and Muslims after Barcelona te
by jgw
08/18/17 06:51 PM
OJ Simpson Pop-Up Museum To Open In Chinatown
by Golem
08/18/17 04:09 PM
CONFIRMED: 2016 was Earth's hottest year in the record books
by pondering_it_all
08/18/17 01:40 AM
24 Novels That Are Crying Out To Be Turned Into A TV Series
by matthew
08/17/17 11:39 PM
Standing Ovations for Triumphant Dennis Prager, Conducting at Disney Hall
by Golem
08/17/17 06:06 PM
Forum Stats
6241 Members
57 Forums
16016 Topics
276212 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#299402 - 03/09/17 02:28 PM Ethics: a matter of morality or pragmatism?
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8570
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Given that Trump and the GOP are busy removing ethics from every dusty corner of our increasingly dilapidated national house, I thought it might be interesting to examine the purpose and usefulness of ethics.

I think of ethics as the set of rules for the very complex game of managing interactions amongst humans. The game is so complex that the rules must be allowed some flexibility to adapt to circumstances, yet not go to pieces altogether when change is needed. The Constitution comes to mind as an expression of a set of ethics, more so than a set of inflexible rules. Perhaps the most important outcome of ethics is the maintenance of a high enough degree of respect among the players of the game to guard against a descent into chaos.

Morality, on the other hand, is a body of rules, also developed to manage human behaviors, that have crystallized into inflexibility with the exclusion of respect.

The thoughts above were stimulated by reading this article today.
Quote:
Nietzsche elsewhere characterized moral philosophy as the use of bad logic to prop up inherited prejudices. The gibeís a good one, and generally far more accurate than not, but again itís easy to misunderstand. Nietzsche was not saying that morality is a waste of time and we all ought to run out and do whatever happens to come into our heads, from whatever source. He was saying that we donít yet know the first thing about morality, because weíve allowed bad logic and inherited prejudices to get in the way of asking the necessary questionsóbecause we havenít realized that we donít yet have any clear idea of how to live.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you understand what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#299405 - 03/09/17 04:10 PM Re: Ethics: a matter of morality or pragmatism? [Re: logtroll]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15378
I've often decribed the difference between ethics and morality in this way: ethics are applied, morality is imposed. That distinction is important, because ethics, in my view, are a set of guidelines that inform our behavior, where morality directs it. In that respect, all ethics are "situational." If you are in this set of circumstances, how do you behave?

I think your analogy to the Constitution is particularly apt, and why Scalia, and his "originalists", are inherently wrong. The founders were ethicists, not moralists. They believed that they had set up a system that could adapt over time to changing circumstances, and for hundreds of years that is how it has worked. (The "common law", with which they were intimately familiar, works the same way.) It is how we have progressed as a nation with the same Constitution.

The Constitution is a document intended to be applied, not a rigid moral tome. It is thus, pragmatic and ethical.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 40 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Albertpkr, kechua, burkha, bikrami, inekifoh
6241 Registered Users
A2