Current Topics
Trump Forum
by rporter314
1 second ago
3 word story game
by TatumAH
Today at 02:58 AM
Noam Chomsky: GOP most dangerous organization in history
by Ken Condon
Today at 02:03 AM
Despite Inmate Deaths Sheriff Clarke Keeps His Job
by TatumAH
Yesterday at 11:34 PM
Worst Case Scenario
by TatumAH
Yesterday at 03:19 AM
No Reform Without the Forms
by pondering_it_all
04/27/17 11:56 PM
Sous vide cooking...
by Greger
04/27/17 06:22 PM
Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi
by rporter314
04/27/17 03:33 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by Golem
04/26/17 10:00 PM
Strong Women Should NEVER Do These Things For a Man — or Anyone Else
by Golem
04/26/17 07:23 PM
Round Table for April 2017
by TatumAH
04/26/17 04:20 PM
Carried away: how the Carl Vinson's canceled port visit sparked a global crisis
by pondering_it_all
04/26/17 01:15 AM
O.C. Register gets new Anaheim address
by Golem
04/25/17 07:21 PM
South African hunter WAS killed by a crocodile, DNA tests on human remains found
by pdx rick
04/25/17 06:56 PM
Authoritarian to Authoritarian
by NW Ponderer
04/25/17 02:21 AM
Forum Stats
6220 Members
57 Forums
15878 Topics
274394 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#299402 - 03/09/17 02:28 PM Ethics: a matter of morality or pragmatism?
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8486
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Given that Trump and the GOP are busy removing ethics from every dusty corner of our increasingly dilapidated national house, I thought it might be interesting to examine the purpose and usefulness of ethics.

I think of ethics as the set of rules for the very complex game of managing interactions amongst humans. The game is so complex that the rules must be allowed some flexibility to adapt to circumstances, yet not go to pieces altogether when change is needed. The Constitution comes to mind as an expression of a set of ethics, more so than a set of inflexible rules. Perhaps the most important outcome of ethics is the maintenance of a high enough degree of respect among the players of the game to guard against a descent into chaos.

Morality, on the other hand, is a body of rules, also developed to manage human behaviors, that have crystallized into inflexibility with the exclusion of respect.

The thoughts above were stimulated by reading this article today.
Quote:
Nietzsche elsewhere characterized moral philosophy as the use of bad logic to prop up inherited prejudices. The gibe’s a good one, and generally far more accurate than not, but again it’s easy to misunderstand. Nietzsche was not saying that morality is a waste of time and we all ought to run out and do whatever happens to come into our heads, from whatever source. He was saying that we don’t yet know the first thing about morality, because we’ve allowed bad logic and inherited prejudices to get in the way of asking the necessary questions—because we haven’t realized that we don’t yet have any clear idea of how to live.
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you know what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#299405 - 03/09/17 04:10 PM Re: Ethics: a matter of morality or pragmatism? [Re: logtroll]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15134
I've often decribed the difference between ethics and morality in this way: ethics are applied, morality is imposed. That distinction is important, because ethics, in my view, are a set of guidelines that inform our behavior, where morality directs it. In that respect, all ethics are "situational." If you are in this set of circumstances, how do you behave?

I think your analogy to the Constitution is particularly apt, and why Scalia, and his "originalists", are inherently wrong. The founders were ethicists, not moralists. They believed that they had set up a system that could adapt over time to changing circumstances, and for hundreds of years that is how it has worked. (The "common law", with which they were intimately familiar, works the same way.) It is how we have progressed as a nation with the same Constitution.

The Constitution is a document intended to be applied, not a rigid moral tome. It is thus, pragmatic and ethical.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 52 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
agentfity, ojixadybi, tjgraylaw, AndyEmisa, lubluodPix
6220 Registered Users
A2