Current Topics
Mueller indictments
by Jeffery J. Haas
0 seconds ago
The War On Drugs
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 03:44 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 03:19 AM
The Democratic Plan
by Greger
Yesterday at 08:33 PM
Round Table For July 2018
by chunkstyle
Yesterday at 03:32 PM
Helsinki
by Jeffery J. Haas
07/17/18 11:50 PM
Returning rationality to public policy
by pondering_it_all
07/17/18 06:54 PM
Yes, Normal Republican Elites Are a Threat to Democracy
by Greger
07/17/18 02:15 AM
Pie Chart Fight
by chunkstyle
07/16/18 04:39 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by logtroll
07/16/18 12:34 AM
The Trump Precedency: the 25th Amendment
by pondering_it_all
07/14/18 10:11 PM
The End of the Independent Judiciary
by chunkstyle
07/13/18 08:40 PM
FBI Investigator
by Ujest Shurly
07/13/18 08:25 PM
TrumpTrade
by jgw
07/13/18 04:46 PM
Charles Oakley arrested for allegedly cheating at casino
by pondering_it_all
07/12/18 10:49 PM
The immigration thing
by NW Ponderer
07/12/18 07:05 PM
Being Uncivil to Barbarians
by Greger
07/12/18 04:48 PM
How to tell a real Trump supporter from a Russian troll
by Greger
07/12/18 04:36 PM
Misusing the Police and Racism
by NW Ponderer
07/10/18 07:15 AM
Leaving the Party
by NW Ponderer
07/10/18 03:42 AM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16315 Topics
280929 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#301749 - 06/18/17 04:11 PM The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16056
The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy - vice.
Quote:
For all of the attention paid to former FBI Director Jim Comey's highly anticipated testimony before the Senate intelligence committee last Thursday, the most important constitutional law development from last week took place across the street (and three days earlier), when the Supreme Court agreed to hear argument in Carpenter v. United States later this year—though exactly when, we're not sure.

Carpenter raises a specific question about whether Americans have an expectation of privacy in historical "cell-site location information" ("CSLI"). The Petitioner, Timothy Carpenter, was one of two defendants convicted for his role in a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio, based in part on 127 days of CSLI data that placed him between ˝ and 2 miles from the robberies around the time they were committed.
Our surveillance society on trial.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#301787 - 06/20/17 12:03 AM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Online   sick


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13196
Loc: Whittier, California
Shared everywhere (hat tip to you, NWP, of course)
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#301793 - 06/20/17 07:48 AM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7686
Loc: North San Diego County
Or just maybe criminals will get smart enough to turn off their cell phones during crimes?

Top
#301795 - 06/20/17 02:36 PM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16056
I see two fundamental issues at play here: First, that the data exists; second, how it is used. We live in a time when a mind-boggling amount of data is being generated, and stored, on us, even without our knowledge. Every time we use the Internet, make a phone call, move our vehicle, turn on our microwave (right, Kellyanne?), we are feeding a vast network that records, stores and analyzes information about us.

And that data is then use against us - to target us with advertising, try to influence our vote, charge us with crimes, change our insurance profiles. Big data is not our friend, no matter how we are sold that bill of goods. It may be good for corporations, for law enforcement agencies, for political parties, but try to think of one instance where you, as an individual, has benefited. I'll wait.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top

Who's Online
1 registered (Jeffery J. Haas), 42 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2