Current Topics
Trump Forum
by pondering_it_all
Star Trek: Discovery to ditch a long frustrating Trek rule
by Golem
06:45 PM
Trump and Russia
by rporter314
10:52 AM
why democrats are losing
by pondering_it_all
04:56 AM
Deceptive marketing, or frivolous lawsuit?
by pondering_it_all
04:52 AM
The truth - finally
by Jeffery J. Haas
12:53 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
09:33 PM
Want to do something about global warming?
by logtroll
12:29 PM
Should Star Trek Sequels Return to the Prime Timeline?
by Golem
01:46 AM
On Confirmation Bias (or why facts don't matter)
by jgw
06/21/17 09:53 PM
The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals (1972)
by Jeffery J. Haas
06/21/17 09:35 PM
Will the Supreme Court draw the line on gerrymandering?
by rporter314
06/21/17 05:04 PM
Gun Deaths In America
by NW Ponderer
06/20/17 04:44 PM
The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy
by NW Ponderer
06/20/17 02:36 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2017
by NW Ponderer
06/20/17 04:46 AM
Forum Stats
6234 Members
57 Forums
15946 Topics
275247 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 05:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#301749 - 06/18/17 04:11 PM The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15238
The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy - vice.
Quote:
For all of the attention paid to former FBI Director Jim Comey's highly anticipated testimony before the Senate intelligence committee last Thursday, the most important constitutional law development from last week took place across the street (and three days earlier), when the Supreme Court agreed to hear argument in Carpenter v. United States later this year—though exactly when, we're not sure.

Carpenter raises a specific question about whether Americans have an expectation of privacy in historical "cell-site location information" ("CSLI"). The Petitioner, Timothy Carpenter, was one of two defendants convicted for his role in a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio, based in part on 127 days of CSLI data that placed him between ˝ and 2 miles from the robberies around the time they were committed.
Our surveillance society on trial.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#301787 - 06/20/17 12:03 AM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 12492
Loc: Whittier, California
Shared everywhere (hat tip to you, NWP, of course)
_________________________
The men the American public admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth. - H. L. Mencken

Top
#301793 - 06/20/17 07:48 AM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 6681
Loc: North San Diego County
Or just maybe criminals will get smart enough to turn off their cell phones during crimes?

Top
#301795 - 06/20/17 02:36 PM Re: The Supreme Court Phone Location Case Will Decide the Future of Privacy [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15238
I see two fundamental issues at play here: First, that the data exists; second, how it is used. We live in a time when a mind-boggling amount of data is being generated, and stored, on us, even without our knowledge. Every time we use the Internet, make a phone call, move our vehicle, turn on our microwave (right, Kellyanne?), we are feeding a vast network that records, stores and analyzes information about us.

And that data is then use against us - to target us with advertising, try to influence our vote, charge us with crimes, change our insurance profiles. Big data is not our friend, no matter how we are sold that bill of goods. It may be good for corporations, for law enforcement agencies, for political parties, but try to think of one instance where you, as an individual, has benefited. I'll wait.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 38 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Seadog, sapogvvsrost, papedPop, Dujmovochka123, zapedPop
6234 Registered Users
A2