Current Topics
White Hoods, Brown Shirts and Red Hats
by NW Ponderer
Today at 07:11 AM
Round Table for August, 2018
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 05:37 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 11:22 PM
Historic Corruption
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Illinois celebrates first official 'Barack Obama Day'
by Greger
Yesterday at 09:03 PM
Returning rationality to public policy
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 04:04 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:01 AM
Despicable, lying liars turning on each other
by Greger
08/16/18 02:13 AM
equal rights amendment
by jgw
08/15/18 06:33 PM
Things not considered much
by pondering_it_all
08/12/18 11:22 PM
Ohio 12 and Kansas Governor
by Greger
08/12/18 02:03 AM
Jonah Goldberg: Farce as Tragedy
by Greger
08/12/18 01:40 AM
Trump's legal woes
by rporter314
08/08/18 06:21 PM
Lt. Joe Kenda Is Still Adjusting to Being the (Giant) Face of a TV Network
by Golem
08/07/18 11:05 PM
The moral case for removing the President
by rporter314
08/07/18 01:32 PM
KFC chooses 'Seinfeld' star Jason Alexander as newest 'Colonel Sanders'
by pondering_it_all
08/07/18 04:26 AM
Teenager at San Diego Padres Game Mortified as Mom Starts Dancing in the Stands
by pondering_it_all
08/05/18 11:57 PM
Russell Hantz on Australian Survivor
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/05/18 05:51 PM
Mueller's Trial Run
by NW Ponderer
08/05/18 04:06 PM
John Stossel: The War on Tipping
by Greger
08/05/18 02:46 AM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16340 Topics
281344 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#304058 - 11/22/17 08:01 PM 'fixing' the internet
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2053
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
http://reason.com/blog/2017/11/21/ajit-pai-net-neutrality-podcast?utm_medium=email

Current internet rankings:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinmurnan...s/#52f774cc65b5

Not unlike everything else that gov 'fixes' we are slower than most other industrialized and also get to pay more than most of the other industrialized.

After gov is through 'fixing', of course, things are not going to be particularly better (except for them that can pay the bucks)

Our speed is half that of Norway, you know, that country which the happiest on earth even though they are taxed a lot more than we are. The difference being, of course, that their leaders actually function in their own national interest with little waste. (sorry, couldn't resist)


Edited by jgw (11/22/17 08:02 PM)

Top
#304059 - 11/22/17 09:08 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Ujest Shurly Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/16/16
Posts: 323
Loc: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
The real kicker, we invented the internet and we rank so poorly.
_________________________
Vote 2018; give meaning and honor to those who made sure you have the right to vote.

Life is like a PB&J sandwich
The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!

Top
#304062 - 11/22/17 09:35 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13225
Loc: Whittier, California
I'm through with trying to petition a fascist banana republic to consider the needs of its people, when the best we might hope for is a temporary stay due to massive public outcry, only to be forced into the same crisis a couple of years later, where we again go down the same road, endure the same giant lawsuits by big telecom and watch our legislators bow to lobbyists.

It's not going to work, it's never going to work, we will never have security and stability in our data infrastructure. We're not the customers, we are the product, we are the commodity, and it is in their best interest to SQUEEZE us dry.

If I had the money and the resources, I would commence building a new and separate public internet that runs alongside the commercial one, and which ignores ANY and ALL new "laws" designed to protect the interests of the big conglomerates.
It would be the data equivalent of a Brazilian favela, and with enough public awareness and enough available resources, millions of people would gradually switch, or at the very least, ADD the service for use when their own commercial internet begins to fail them.

With enough participation, the government would be unable to enforce any action, because the agencies tasked with that responsibility would bankrupt themselves.

It has happened before:

In the mid-1970's the heavily regulated and enforced "Citizen's Band Radio Service" suddenly experienced a cultural tsunami. Movies, music and popular culture branded CB as an icon and as a pastime.
Previously, users had to apply for licenses to operate and conduct was strictly regulated.
The FCC was attempting to crack down further on activity when the trucker revolution hit.
Suddenly, in 1977, forty million Americans got CB radios for Christmas and the FCC was unable to enforce diddly squat.

Two months later the FCC dropped the license requirements altogether.
CB radio had become a "favela", a very successful favela.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304064 - 11/22/17 10:51 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7763
Loc: North San Diego County
You can actually do that right now. There are several schemes and dirt-cheap hardware for creating ad-hoc networks. If everybody in a community wanted to join in, they could easily all be linked together with wifi links.

But that only gets you connected to the people in your community. It does not get you to all the content providers we all seem to love and need. To connect to somebody on the other side of the country, you need a fiber backbone. Those are expensive and only big companies own them. If government ran backbones, we could have the kind of service you envision, but they don't. (But I bet they do in Norway!)

I think the only thing this will affect is real-time streaming of high resolution video. If a backbone is carrying high-res video and much lower time-sensitivity traffic like email and web service, then it makes sense to prioritize. You won't notice if your web surfing takes an extra 1/10th of a second, but random 1/10th second delays in video make it unwatchable.

It's very easy for a router to identify video packets versus others, so this would be simple to implement. Just turning on this feature would make EVERYONE a lot happier with their internet service but it violates net neutrality rules.

The point being, that there are certain types of net optimization we will all like and other types we will hate. So let's concentrate on outlawing the bad ones.

Top
#304066 - 11/22/17 11:27 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: pondering_it_all]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13225
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
You can actually do that right now. There are several schemes and dirt-cheap hardware for creating ad-hoc networks. If everybody in a community wanted to join in, they could easily all be linked together with wifi links.


PIA, it's not difficult to connect a backbone to that ad hoc network.
And since one would be purchasing a business pipe, the usual net neutrality rules don't apply because when you purchase business pipe, that's what separates it from residential, the uptime and the guaranteed neutrality. YOU, as the new ad hoc ISP, set the rules for packets.
That IS the "favela" I am talking about.

Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
The point being, that there are certain types of net optimization we will all like and other types we will hate. So let's concentrate on outlawing the bad ones.


With this ruling, outlawing the bad ones won't be possible anymore, ever. We will be at their mercy.

And besides, this is also going to kill off the cord cutters.
That's another aspect of the problem, people are sick of paying ridic high prices for sat and cable, for channels they never watch, and they'd rather cut the cord and get their content via the internet over smart TV's.

All that goes away once Big Telco gets to decide what packets get through.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304067 - 11/22/17 11:41 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13225
Loc: Whittier, California
Fox News, Sinclair, Breitbart and InfoWars will be FREE with any internet plan
but if you want CBS, BBC, Reuters, the New York Times, CNN or MSNBC, it's going to cost double.
That's how it's gonna be once net neutrality goes away.

Can you show me how that isn't the reality in today's political climate?
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304068 - 11/23/17 01:41 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7763
Loc: North San Diego County
My current ISP IS Cox Cable, they can't sell me TV signals without putting in about $15,000 worth of buried cable plus repeaters, and the only media website I like that wants to charge me is The Washington Post.

So I'm seeing the opposite of what you are predicting. And lack of net neutrality does not mean ISPs can shut off certain packets. It just means that some packets (like streaming from Netflix 4K) arrive in an isochronous manner. Packets from Huffington Post still get to you with the same random timing they do now.

The whole network neutrality thing is overblown: First of all, it's about how you UPGRADE the network. Do you make all traffic run faster or do you concentrate on the traffic that needs to run faster? I really don't care if my email comes in at 28.8 kbaud, but I want my Netflix not to stutter.

Top
#304069 - 11/23/17 04:04 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13225
Loc: Whittier, California
Well, anyway, we would LIKE to concentrate on outlawing the bad ones but there are NO provisions for doing so whatsoever in the proposed deregulation about to smack us upside the head. If you see any such provisions in the comments over at FCC.gov, please do us all a favor and link them so that we can all be enlightened.

I recognize that some packets (like streaming from Netflix 4K) would simply arrive in an isochronous manner while packets from Huffington Post still get to me with the same random timing they do now.

I recognize that it's about how you UPGRADE the network.

But minus the provisions to shield us from the vagaries of human nature, I suspect that our new reality will be a lot more like I described above.
That's because nothing will stop big telco from arranging it that way, simply because they can, simply because it helps their agenda.

You can argue physics and free markets all day long and you'd be mostly right, but if you ignore political agendas, you have not been paying attention. The agenda is clear, the agenda is to "muzzle der Lugenpresse" as Donald sees it.
The agenda is to make it impossible to be a cord cutter.

All the physics in the world pale next to those two items.

And PS: WaPo is simply doing what they've always done, charging for a "newspaper".
That has nothing to do with the telcos.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304082 - 11/23/17 11:57 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13225
Loc: Whittier, California
Here's an interesting development!
If the FCC and its cronies are so damn sure that sunsetting net neutrality is a fine and dandy idea, you'd think they'd have the confidence to let the idea stand on its own merits.

Apparently not.

Quote:
The generic text in question — “The unprecedented regulatory power the Obama Administration imposed,” it begins — currently appears in some 800,000 of the 22 million comments filed with the FCC.


Investigation of fake net neutrality foes has been stymied by the FCC, New York AG says

Robert Reich weighs in:

Quote:
"By law, when a federal agency like the FCC proposes to change a rule such as net neutrality, it’s supposed to call for public comment.

But apparently hundreds of thousands if not millions of comments seemingly urging repeal of the FCC's net neutrality rule have been faked. Just days after the public comment process opened, reporters began noticing identical comments critical of the Obama-era rule, and many so-called “signers” say they never sent in comments.

In an open letter to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman charges that the FCC’s public comment process “has been corrupted by the fraudulent use of Americans’ identities,” and that the “perpetrators have attempted to drown out the views of the real people, businesses, and others who honestly commented on this important issue.”

Yet the FCC has declined to cooperate with Schneiderman’s investigation, rebuffing requests for logs and other records associated with the comments. Schneiderman says he has made at least 9 requests for records from the FCC between June and November that have gone unanswered.

Once again, the integrity of the nation’s democratic process is being threatened. And once again, it’s the Trump administration that appears to be responsible – and refusing to investigate.

What do you think?"


Republicans just can't participate in democracy or in plain simple justice without putting their thumb on the scale.
Then they turn around and screech about Obama "disobeying the Constitution" and "California ignoring the law".

_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304088 - 11/24/17 03:22 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Ujest Shurly Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/16/16
Posts: 323
Loc: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
Before the current head of the FCC was even considered for the position, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai was a known anti-Net Neutrality advocate. He will not let a small thing like fake public anti-net neutrality comments get in the way of achieving his goal. He will end net neutrality as soon as he can. Without some outside process, legal or congressional, 2018 will be the year a open an equal internet will die.

More Republican fox in the hen house syndrome...
_________________________
Vote 2018; give meaning and honor to those who made sure you have the right to vote.

Life is like a PB&J sandwich
The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 21 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2