Current Topics
Utah Senator Orrin Hatch ... The elephant in the room.
by Buzzard's Roost
0 seconds ago
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 06:24 PM
TRUMP 2020!
by Ujest Shurly
Today at 05:19 PM
Clint Walker - "Cheyenne" turns 90 today
by Ken Condon
Today at 05:03 AM
The End of the Independent Judiciary
by NW Ponderer
05/22/18 02:28 PM
The Democratic Plan
by rporter314
05/22/18 10:42 AM
Round Table for May, 2018
by pondering_it_all
05/22/18 08:57 AM
Are we at War with Iran?
by pdx rick
05/22/18 04:04 AM
Time check in
by chunkstyle
05/21/18 01:36 PM
What it will take to curb the President
by Ujest Shurly
05/20/18 08:41 PM
A Thought
by jgw
05/15/18 06:42 PM
States and campaign finance
by jgw
05/13/18 06:08 PM
The Mob Boss with Pardon Power
by pondering_it_all
05/11/18 09:35 PM
Richard Painter Switches from GOP to DFL in Senate Run
by pondering_it_all
05/11/18 05:58 AM
Federalist Society Promotes Drug Use
by NW Ponderer
05/10/18 06:54 PM
Bernie's got unions backs
by chunkstyle
05/10/18 03:23 AM
Democratic Purity
by pdx rick
05/09/18 04:42 AM
Playin' Doctor
by pondering_it_all
05/08/18 02:35 AM
What is it with John Kerry Negotiating with the Enemy?
by Jeffery J. Haas
05/07/18 09:13 PM
University of Florida Apologizes After Black Graduates Were Manhandled at Commen
by Golem
05/07/18 07:41 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16271 Topics
280215 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#304091 - 11/24/17 07:35 PM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: Ujest Shurly]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13121
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: Ujest Shurly
Before the current head of the FCC was even considered for the position, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai was a known anti-Net Neutrality advocate. He will not let a small thing like fake public anti-net neutrality comments get in the way of achieving his goal. He will end net neutrality as soon as he can. Without some outside process, legal or congressional, 2018 will be the year a open an equal internet will die.

More Republican fox in the hen house syndrome...


I'm afraid I don't get where you're coming from.
The "fake" anti net neutrality comments are posing as his natural allies, and I don't quite see the exposure of those comments as possible fakes as being any kind of obstacle in today's post-truth/post-fact environment.
Republicans will categorically dismiss such charges as baseless and they will finish their work, that of not only doing away with net neutrality but with nearly all regulations whatsoever for ISP's.

The problem is not just the death of net neutrality, it's the lack of any structure to protect users from the predatory nature of a near duopoly-style comm infrastructure. There really are only TWO major conglomerates that form the bulk of our data backbone at this point.
There's more than two but if the two largest sneeze, everyone gets a cold.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304099 - 11/25/17 12:54 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40878
Loc: Puget Sound, WA


Can't someone bring a lawsuit to stop this rule from going into effect? Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#304100 - 11/25/17 01:54 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13121
Loc: Whittier, California
Sure, and maybe we'll all be DEAD by the time there's a final ruling.
I much prefer setting up internet favelas everywhere.
A single business class gigabit pipe can serve a fairly good sized neighborhood.

Just like the best solution for the Trump tax code is for everyone to become a corporation, the best solution to Ajit Pai's deregulation of the net is for everyone to become an ISP.
At first they'll try to crack down but again, it's all in the numbers.
If forty million people start doing this, not only will they be unable to enforce anything, the big telcos will be apoplectic.
Final step is to nationalize the internet...that's the only thing these weasels will understand.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304102 - 11/25/17 03:48 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7565
Loc: North San Diego County
If the big ISPs start to do too obnoxious stuff, it could mean the resurgence of smaller ISPs (who would draw customers by NOT doing that stuff). These could be collectives but much more likely just small businessmen. All they have to do is get a good connection into a backbone and a carrier agreement with a local telco or cable company to connect to people's homes.

I doubt customers would be willing to go back to dialup, so they have to use the connections people already have in their houses. I guess in dense areas, they could start wiring up their own wifi routers but it still is a problem getting packets back to their backbone connection. Telcos and cable companies have all the local franchises tied up, so you probably can't get your wire on their poles.

Google probably had the answer some time back: Put in underground fiber to each neighborhood and use wifi from that point. Not cheap if you have to dig.

Top
#304103 - 11/25/17 04:20 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13121
Loc: Whittier, California
You are basically describing a lot of the points I was getting at, decentralized and more responsive ISP's based on neighborhood needs I'm just taking it the FAVELA route instead, because at this point feck their rules and feck their laws, let them try to enforce and prosecute when ten, twenty or even forty million users start flocking to the favelas.

If you know how the favelas operate outside the authority of the official cities in Brazil, then you understand what I am getting at. There will ALWAYS be a way to get business class high speed pipe put wherever it is needed. Lower overhead thanks to community involvement and nonprofit status, and running it like an ad hoc public service.

Will there be bumps and bruises? You bet there will be, just as there is with life in a favela, but you're outside the authority of Trump and the big telcos and the only limitation is the committment people are willing to put into it.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#304118 - 11/26/17 12:27 AM Re: 'fixing' the internet [Re: jgw]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15953
I think the Trump administration has a plan to fix the internet. They're going to put Mick Mulvaney in charge of it. Then the internet will be permanently fecked, just like everything else he touches. Oh, you did't mean "fixed" like your dog is "fixed"? ... oh well.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
0 registered (), 24 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2