Current Topics
Is invoking non- existent privilege obstruction?
by NW Ponderer
37 minutes 48 seconds ago
Why Norwegians Aren't Moving to the U.S.
by pondering_it_all
54 minutes 30 seconds ago
Underclass
by pondering_it_all
Today at 04:36 AM
"Moron...Man-Ch
ild...Trump"

by pondering_it_all
Today at 04:29 AM
Let's check in on the cattle abusers, deadbeat grazers, wildlife squatter Bundys
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
WalMart closing 63 Sam's Club
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 04:54 AM
list of what Trump has done so far
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 02:41 AM
Moderation and good will
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:14 AM
Fahrenheit 451
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/16/18 10:21 PM
Round Table for January, 2018
by Greger
01/16/18 08:06 PM
Car flies into 2nd floor of Santa Ana building
by pondering_it_all
01/16/18 03:27 AM
Five Decades of White Backlash
by pondering_it_all
01/16/18 03:11 AM
Reasons People Lie When They Donít Need To
by pondering_it_all
01/15/18 12:15 AM
Gay Old Time: The rise and fall of Laguna Beachís gay clubs
by pondering_it_all
01/13/18 08:10 AM
Campaign themes for 2018
by matthew
01/13/18 03:28 AM
Immigration Realities
by pdx rick
01/12/18 06:09 PM
Bitcoin
by pdx rick
01/12/18 05:43 PM
Trump and Russia
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/11/18 12:51 AM
Trump, you failed. Put America first. Walk away.
by pondering_it_all
01/09/18 09:46 PM
Politicizing Justice
by NW Ponderer
01/08/18 06:02 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16158 Topics
278553 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 42 of 44 < 1 2 ... 40 41 42 43 44 >
Topic Options
#304846 - 01/04/18 05:59 AM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7274
Loc: North San Diego County
Heh, heh, heh: Trump had his lawyer sent Bannon a Cease and Desist letter claiming he violated a confidentiality agreement, and to stop libeling him. But this is a trap for Trump! If there ever WAS a court action, Bannon would testify under oath and prove everything he claims. Then Trump would have to testify under oath and he would perjure himself. He just can't help it. His brain has obviously deteriorated enough that he can't remember what he said the day or hour before.

His lawyers will NEVER let him take the stand.

Top
#304847 - 01/04/18 12:25 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pondering_it_all]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40730
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
Heh, heh, heh: Trump had his lawyer sent Bannon a Cease and Desist letter claiming he violated a confidentiality agreement, and to stop libeling him. But this is a trap for Trump! If there ever WAS a court action, Bannon would testify under oath and prove everything he claims. Then Trump would have to testify under oath and he would perjure himself. He just can't help it. His brain has obviously deteriorated enough that he can't remember what he said the day or hour before.

His lawyers will NEVER let him take the stand.

In the words of Don Trump Jr: "I love it."

This Bannon v Trump in-fighting is so awesome. I'll have to buy a Costco-sized carton of microwave popcorn and just sit-back and do some reading. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#304848 - 01/04/18 12:32 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40730
Loc: Puget Sound, WA

Steve Bannon said that Donald J Trump is a money launderer (quelle surprise! laugh ) and that Robert Mueller is on the right track. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#304858 - 01/04/18 07:32 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7274
Loc: North San Diego County
Quote:
Donald J Trump is a money launderer


That's been so obvious ever since all the US banks figured out Trump would always rip them off.

Top
#304866 - 01/04/18 08:22 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pondering_it_all]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15683
Deputy AG, FBI director make unannounced visit to Paul Ryan's office. "Muzzle your dog," they said, "and you'll be the next President."
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#304870 - 01/04/18 08:45 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6285
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Can Mueller file charges against sitting members of Congress who are patently trying to obstruct an investigation?

Why would any sane rational person want to do that if they were innocent?

Inquiring minds want to know.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#304871 - 01/04/18 09:21 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7274
Loc: North San Diego County
I think we know now that the FBI investigations started long before the Steele dossier was published, because George Papadopoulos made a drunken confession to Australia's top diplomat in England that the Russians had hacked Democratic emails. Australia contacted the FBI. The stuff in the Steele dossier just confirmed some of their info.

So Nunes' entire theory is blown all to hell. He's barking up the wrong tree and instead of changing trees, he's just barking louder. He's going to be disgraced and then out of office after November.

The recent revelations from Fusion just make these Republican committee members look like gangsters instead of Congressmen.

Top
#304874 - 01/04/18 10:01 PM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: rporter314]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 15683
That's a good question. Probably not, although... I was going to post a lengthy response when I came across this article while researching. It does a better job than I could, anyway. Why It is Pointless to Sue a Member of Congress for Defamation - Point of Order. Although the issues are different, the concept is the same.
Quote:
It is very difficult to define the outer boundaries of the ďjobĒ of a Member of Congress. Almost anything the Member does may have an impact on his relationship with his constituents. Even matters which are indisputably personal, if they become a matter of media inquiry, can impact the Memberís image and thus affect his ability to effectively represent his constituents. This, at least, was the reasoning of Council on Am Islamic Relations v. Ballenger, 444 F.3d 659 (D.C. Cir. 2006), where the court stated: ďA Memberís ability to do his job as a legislator effectively is tied, as in this case, to the Memberís relationship with the public and in particular his constituents in the Congress. In other words, there was a clear nexus between the congressman answering a reporterís question about the congressmanís personal life and the congressmanís ability to carry out his representative responsibilities effectively.Ē


One person's "obstruction" is another's "constituent service".
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#304881 - 01/05/18 01:59 AM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6285
Loc: Highlands, Tx
perhaps constituent nullification ... o thats right ... they voted for Mr Trump
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#304890 - 01/05/18 09:39 AM Re: Trump and Russia [Re: pdx rick]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7274
Loc: North San Diego County
This is so much like Watergate, it is stunning: If they just acknowledged the original crime, sent a few people to jail, and then moved on, it would not have been a big deal. Instead it is all the things they do right up to the highest levels to cover up the crime, that get them in deeper and deeper. Covering up a crime IS Obstruction of Justice! It is much more serious than even the original crime, unless somebody was killed. And it is certainly a High Crime when the President does it.

If Trump was not such a basic crook, at the first mention of Russian dirt they would have called in the FBI. Maybe NOBODY would have gone to jail at all!

There were five Watergate burglars, but 40 government officials were indicted or jailed in the end.

Top
Page 42 of 44 < 1 2 ... 40 41 42 43 44 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 23 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2