Current Topics
gas lighting and the meda
by rporter314
01:51 PM
RoundTable for June 2018
by Ken Condon
12:06 AM
TrumpTrade
by Greger
09:36 PM
The Democratic Plan
by chunkstyle
06:15 PM
The Homeless
by jgw
05:47 PM
small (SMR) and very small (VSMR) nuclear reactors
by jgw
06/18/18 08:01 PM
Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana
by rporter314
06/17/18 02:41 AM
Lying with Impunity
by matthew
06/16/18 10:13 PM
G6 plus one
by NW Ponderer
06/15/18 05:19 AM
The 9.9 Percent Is the New American Aristocracy
by pondering_it_all
06/14/18 11:14 PM
Antarctica lost 3 trillion tonnes of ice in blink of an eye
by matthew
06/14/18 10:11 PM
Da Singapore Summit!
by pondering_it_all
06/13/18 03:29 AM
What if Star Wars never happened?
by pondering_it_all
06/10/18 05:33 PM
Anthony Bourdain
by pondering_it_all
06/10/18 05:20 PM
What it will take to curb the President
by pondering_it_all
06/09/18 05:48 AM
The failure of the public school system
by pondering_it_all
06/08/18 11:10 PM
Sorting it out
by logtroll
06/06/18 10:40 PM
Allam Cycle - Zero Emissions Nat Gas Power Plant
by pondering_it_all
06/04/18 08:23 PM
The American Dream
by Jeffery J. Haas
06/02/18 10:08 PM
Ranking All 10 Star Wars Movies Worst to Best
by rporter314
06/01/18 02:56 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16290 Topics
280424 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#305756 - 02/25/18 01:50 AM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7616
Loc: North San Diego County
The Supreme Court actually goes along with almost anything a state wants to do regarding guns. I imagine a state could even require all guns to be kept in central government armories, unless the owner wanted to check them out for a hunting trip or target shooting event. Is there a home defense need that is not met by a single pump-action shotgun per adult?

Top
#305766 - 02/25/18 08:27 PM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
jgw Online   content
member

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 1958
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
It would seem, on the face of it, that the Supremes actually do buy into the "well regulated" part of the second amendment and has not ruled against any actual gun regulations, other than those that might deny a citizen the supposed right to own a weapon unless there is reason, such as insanity, a history of violence, etc. It also means that when gov tries to 'regulate' they are well within their right and all the talk about ignoring the second amendment, taking away rights, etc. is just pure unadulterated blather and should be treated as suck.

This morning I watched some of the gun blather on the political shows and it was truly disgusting. All these arguments over the second amendment! NOBODY has suggested taking away a right to bear arms - NOBODY! Its all fear crap coming from the gun manufacturer and repeated by the greedy brain dead intent on getting theirs from the gun manufacturers. I do, however, wonder about the gun manufacturers themselves. They gave something like 33 million to the Lying Jackass and, it would seem, compliant legislators get something between 3 and 6 million each to keep their jobs too. I wonder, just how much profit do these people make? On the face of it they seem to be giving away at least, easily, more than 100 million dollars annually. This is not money raised by due paying NRA members (if you buy a gun you are registered as a member of the NRA and if you choose to not pay your dues you are still a member and will have been sent a card to prove it!). Anyway, on top of that the NRA spends more millions training and 'educating'. Again, how much money do these people make? I think the Remington gun manufacturer, for instance, just went banko! Consider how much money they would have if they weren't giving 100+ million away every year! My suspicion, based on absolutely nothing, tends to make me wonder why they are actually doing what they are doing as it would seem that is actually cutting into their profit!

Perhaps the Dems should press to make sure that claimed NRA membership includes only dues paying members and not those who are claimed to be members simply because they bought a gun. That might be a really good place to start against all these claims? I also think that those who are paying dues should be made aware that they needn't as they would still be a member whether they liked it or not. Again, I suspect that many paying in might be interested to know that they don't need to.

Top
#305773 - 02/26/18 04:50 PM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
rporter314 Online   content
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6415
Loc: Highlands, Tx
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#305780 - 02/27/18 01:37 AM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
Ujest Shurly Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/16/16
Posts: 302
Loc: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
Good article, Thanks
_________________________
Vote 2018

Life is like a PB&J sandwich
The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
0 registered (), 51 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2