Current Topics
Voters
by chunkstyle
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Kavanaugh and the FBI
by rporter314
Yesterday at 11:22 PM
The Midterms
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 11:14 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Golem
Yesterday at 04:19 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
10/19/18 06:18 PM
The chosen one?
by pondering_it_all
10/19/18 05:04 AM
Roundtable for October 2018
by pondering_it_all
10/19/18 04:58 AM
What Left?
by Greger
10/19/18 03:18 AM
Debt Crises
by jgw
10/18/18 09:39 PM
The Magic of Biochar
by Greger
10/13/18 07:08 PM
The Blindness of Good intentions
by jgw
10/09/18 09:26 PM
Trump’s ‘New’ Can-Mex Trade Deal Has All Kinds Of Improvements? Thanks, Obama
by jgw
10/09/18 05:35 PM
The End of the Independent Judiciary
by pdx rick
10/07/18 02:55 PM
Tiny Hawaiian Gecko Accidentally Calls 'a Bazillion' People from Hospital Phone,
by Greger
10/07/18 01:09 AM
That Bombshell Report on Trump's Taxes May Spark an Investigation by New York
by Jeffery J. Haas
10/05/18 05:03 AM
A time when politics were not all about greed
by jgw
10/04/18 07:28 PM
George Will: Abolish the death penalty
by Greger
10/03/18 12:28 AM
if the Dems take over
by Greger
10/01/18 09:55 PM
Answer (Fredric Brown, 1954)
by jgw
09/28/18 06:24 PM
RoundTable for September 2018
by NW Ponderer
09/28/18 11:24 AM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16401 Topics
282390 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#305756 - 02/25/18 01:50 AM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7934
Loc: North San Diego County
The Supreme Court actually goes along with almost anything a state wants to do regarding guns. I imagine a state could even require all guns to be kept in central government armories, unless the owner wanted to check them out for a hunting trip or target shooting event. Is there a home defense need that is not met by a single pump-action shotgun per adult?

Top
#305766 - 02/25/18 08:27 PM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2143
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
It would seem, on the face of it, that the Supremes actually do buy into the "well regulated" part of the second amendment and has not ruled against any actual gun regulations, other than those that might deny a citizen the supposed right to own a weapon unless there is reason, such as insanity, a history of violence, etc. It also means that when gov tries to 'regulate' they are well within their right and all the talk about ignoring the second amendment, taking away rights, etc. is just pure unadulterated blather and should be treated as suck.

This morning I watched some of the gun blather on the political shows and it was truly disgusting. All these arguments over the second amendment! NOBODY has suggested taking away a right to bear arms - NOBODY! Its all fear crap coming from the gun manufacturer and repeated by the greedy brain dead intent on getting theirs from the gun manufacturers. I do, however, wonder about the gun manufacturers themselves. They gave something like 33 million to the Lying Jackass and, it would seem, compliant legislators get something between 3 and 6 million each to keep their jobs too. I wonder, just how much profit do these people make? On the face of it they seem to be giving away at least, easily, more than 100 million dollars annually. This is not money raised by due paying NRA members (if you buy a gun you are registered as a member of the NRA and if you choose to not pay your dues you are still a member and will have been sent a card to prove it!). Anyway, on top of that the NRA spends more millions training and 'educating'. Again, how much money do these people make? I think the Remington gun manufacturer, for instance, just went banko! Consider how much money they would have if they weren't giving 100+ million away every year! My suspicion, based on absolutely nothing, tends to make me wonder why they are actually doing what they are doing as it would seem that is actually cutting into their profit!

Perhaps the Dems should press to make sure that claimed NRA membership includes only dues paying members and not those who are claimed to be members simply because they bought a gun. That might be a really good place to start against all these claims? I also think that those who are paying dues should be made aware that they needn't as they would still be a member whether they liked it or not. Again, I suspect that many paying in might be interested to know that they don't need to.

Top
#305773 - 02/26/18 04:50 PM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
rporter314 Online   content
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6528
Loc: Highlands, Tx
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#305780 - 02/27/18 01:37 AM Re: The second amendment revisited. [Re: jgw]
Ujest Shurly Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/16/16
Posts: 356
Loc: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
Good article, Thanks
_________________________
Vote 2018; give meaning and honor to those who made sure you have the right to vote.

Life is like a PB&J sandwich
The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
0 registered (), 52 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2