Current Topics
The Russian Revolution
by Greger
08/20/18 03:23 AM
People threatening to boycott Nathanís hot-dogs because of Trump fundraiser
by Greger
08/20/18 03:14 AM
Returning rationality to public policy
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/20/18 12:32 AM
Historic Corruption
by pdx rick
08/19/18 06:52 PM
Round Table for August, 2018
by pdx rick
08/19/18 06:45 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Golem
08/19/18 06:35 PM
SBRs and PDWs
by NW Ponderer
08/18/18 08:32 PM
White Hoods, Brown Shirts and Red Hats
by NW Ponderer
08/18/18 07:11 AM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/17/18 11:22 PM
Illinois celebrates first official 'Barack Obama Day'
by Greger
08/17/18 09:03 PM
Despicable, lying liars turning on each other
by Greger
08/16/18 02:13 AM
equal rights amendment
by jgw
08/15/18 06:33 PM
Things not considered much
by pondering_it_all
08/12/18 11:22 PM
Ohio 12 and Kansas Governor
by Greger
08/12/18 02:03 AM
Jonah Goldberg: Farce as Tragedy
by Greger
08/12/18 01:40 AM
Trump's legal woes
by rporter314
08/08/18 06:21 PM
Lt. Joe Kenda Is Still Adjusting to Being the (Giant) Face of a TV Network
by Golem
08/07/18 11:05 PM
The moral case for removing the President
by rporter314
08/07/18 01:32 PM
KFC chooses 'Seinfeld' star Jason Alexander as newest 'Colonel Sanders'
by pondering_it_all
08/07/18 04:26 AM
Teenager at San Diego Padres Game Mortified as Mom Starts Dancing in the Stands
by pondering_it_all
08/05/18 11:57 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16343 Topics
281390 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
#305967 - 03/13/18 07:55 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7773
Loc: North San Diego County
The part about misrepresenting assets should let Melania off the hook. I'm sure Donald did that as that the sun will rise tomorrow.

Top
#306009 - 03/15/18 09:07 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pondering_it_all]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16105
Although this was asked in a different thread, the issue is the clause in the Stormy Daniels "Hush" agreement for liquidated damages of $1 million per disclosure. There are several issues here that could be at play: 1) a court or arbitrator could enforce that provision as written, under the assumption that contracts are contracts, or...2) a court or arbitrator could find the provision "unconscionable" on the basis that the payment was only $130,000 so liquidated damages would be excessive (liquidated damages are disfavored in the law in many situations), or c) it could be found to be unenforceable as an "adhesion" contract - so one-sided as indicating that there was no "bargain" involved.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#306013 - 03/16/18 02:13 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40955
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
...I'm sure his lawyers were able to create pretty sophisticated terms for the pre-nup...

i dunno...Michael Cohen hasn't demonstrated much legal intelligence lately. Hmm

It is as if Michael got his JD from Cracker Jacks or Trump University.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#306014 - 03/16/18 02:15 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40955
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
Although this was asked in a different thread, the issue is the clause in the Stormy Daniels "Hush" agreement for liquidated damages of $1 million per disclosure. There are several issues here that could be at play: 1) a court or arbitrator could enforce that provision as written, under the assumption that contracts are contracts, or...2) a court or arbitrator could find the provision "unconscionable" on the basis that the payment was only $130,000 so liquidated damages would be excessive (liquidated damages are disfavored in the law in many situations), or c) it could be found to be unenforceable as an "adhesion" contract - so one-sided as indicating that there was no "bargain" involved.

Does the part that Trump never signed the NDA have any bearing at all?
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#306015 - 03/16/18 04:14 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13230
Loc: Whittier, California
Several people have volunteered to PAY the one million dollars!
So, it might not even matter.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#306017 - 03/16/18 04:17 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pdx rick]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16105
Originally Posted By: pdx rick

Does the part that Trump never signed the NDA have any bearing at all?
Maybe. I saw a comment today that indicated there was an "either/or clause" in the agreement that would moot the argument. I haven't reread the agreement to find that clause.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#306019 - 03/16/18 05:58 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7773
Loc: North San Diego County
The fact that there is a blank line with "Donald J. Trump" typed under it, suggests that they expected Trump to sign it, and more importantly made Stormy think that Trump would sign it. That suggests fraud and I think nullifies the contract. Besides, the lawyer already broke the silence agreement.

Top
#306031 - 03/17/18 12:57 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pondering_it_all]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8846
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
I may have a naive understanding of contract law, but I thought contracts were bound by the signatures of the interested parties and an exchange of valuable consideration.

If Trump neither signed the contract, nor tendered consideration, how can he be damaged by a breach of contract?
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you understand what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#306033 - 03/17/18 02:33 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: logtroll]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8846
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Trump's new favorite song is playing 24/7 on his Twitter feed:

_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you understand what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#306036 - 03/17/18 03:58 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 40955
Loc: Puget Sound, WA

Trump is infamous for going after people on Twitter that he perceives as attacking him. Trump has not Tweeted one iota about Stormy, thus breaking the pattern.

What's different about Stormy that Trump has remained silent? Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 18 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2