Current Topics
The End of the Independent Judiciary
by Ma_Republican
0 seconds ago
Our modern Sinclair Lewis?
by pondering_it_all
Today at 07:10 AM
Code for no black people': New York bar's 'racist' dress code sparks online deba
by pondering_it_all
Today at 06:57 AM
RoundTable for September 2018
by pondering_it_all
Today at 06:53 AM
Answer (Fredric Brown, 1954)
by pondering_it_all
Today at 06:41 AM
A time when politics were not all about greed
by pondering_it_all
Today at 06:35 AM
The United States v Donald Trump
by rporter314
09/24/18 12:54 PM
How the octopus got its smarts
by Ujest Shurly
09/24/18 02:32 AM
Returning rationality to public policy
by NW Ponderer
09/20/18 04:03 PM
The Savage Breast: A Music Clip Thread
by Golem
09/20/18 12:58 AM
Yom Kippur and Kol Nidre
by Golem
09/18/18 06:57 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
09/17/18 10:21 PM
Justice is coming
by jgw
09/17/18 09:37 PM
Flor-i-duh's Governor's Race
by Greger
09/17/18 06:19 PM
‘Unprecedented’: Natural gas expert says ‘over-pressurization’ may be to blame
by NW Ponderer
09/17/18 03:02 PM
George Conway rips Trump over tweet about Obama's '57 states' gaffe
by pdx rick
09/17/18 04:37 AM
Obama's Friday Speech
by pondering_it_all
09/14/18 06:51 AM
Woodward book breaks 93-year publishing record
by Greger
09/14/18 03:01 AM
Mike Rowe on Nike / Kaepernick and 9/11 hero Tom Burnett
by Greger
09/12/18 02:17 AM
The nuclear option
by Greger
09/12/18 01:22 AM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16385 Topics
282020 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
#305967 - 03/13/18 07:55 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7891
Loc: North San Diego County
The part about misrepresenting assets should let Melania off the hook. I'm sure Donald did that as that the sun will rise tomorrow.

Top
#306009 - 03/15/18 09:07 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pondering_it_all]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16205
Although this was asked in a different thread, the issue is the clause in the Stormy Daniels "Hush" agreement for liquidated damages of $1 million per disclosure. There are several issues here that could be at play: 1) a court or arbitrator could enforce that provision as written, under the assumption that contracts are contracts, or...2) a court or arbitrator could find the provision "unconscionable" on the basis that the payment was only $130,000 so liquidated damages would be excessive (liquidated damages are disfavored in the law in many situations), or c) it could be found to be unenforceable as an "adhesion" contract - so one-sided as indicating that there was no "bargain" involved.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#306013 - 03/16/18 02:13 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 41017
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
...I'm sure his lawyers were able to create pretty sophisticated terms for the pre-nup...

i dunno...Michael Cohen hasn't demonstrated much legal intelligence lately. Hmm

It is as if Michael got his JD from Cracker Jacks or Trump University.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#306014 - 03/16/18 02:15 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 41017
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: NW Ponderer
Although this was asked in a different thread, the issue is the clause in the Stormy Daniels "Hush" agreement for liquidated damages of $1 million per disclosure. There are several issues here that could be at play: 1) a court or arbitrator could enforce that provision as written, under the assumption that contracts are contracts, or...2) a court or arbitrator could find the provision "unconscionable" on the basis that the payment was only $130,000 so liquidated damages would be excessive (liquidated damages are disfavored in the law in many situations), or c) it could be found to be unenforceable as an "adhesion" contract - so one-sided as indicating that there was no "bargain" involved.

Does the part that Trump never signed the NDA have any bearing at all?
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#306015 - 03/16/18 04:14 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13271
Loc: Whittier, California
Several people have volunteered to PAY the one million dollars!
So, it might not even matter.
_________________________
"He wakes up in the morning, ****s all over Twitter, ****s all over us, ****s all over his staff, then hits golf balls."
---Congressman Peter King

Top
#306017 - 03/16/18 04:17 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pdx rick]
NW Ponderer Online   content
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16205
Originally Posted By: pdx rick

Does the part that Trump never signed the NDA have any bearing at all?
Maybe. I saw a comment today that indicated there was an "either/or clause" in the agreement that would moot the argument. I haven't reread the agreement to find that clause.
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#306019 - 03/16/18 05:58 AM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 7891
Loc: North San Diego County
The fact that there is a blank line with "Donald J. Trump" typed under it, suggests that they expected Trump to sign it, and more importantly made Stormy think that Trump would sign it. That suggests fraud and I think nullifies the contract. Besides, the lawyer already broke the silence agreement.

Top
#306031 - 03/17/18 12:57 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: pondering_it_all]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8872
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
I may have a naive understanding of contract law, but I thought contracts were bound by the signatures of the interested parties and an exchange of valuable consideration.

If Trump neither signed the contract, nor tendered consideration, how can he be damaged by a breach of contract?
_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you understand what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#306033 - 03/17/18 02:33 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: logtroll]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 8872
Loc: New Mexico (not old Mexico)
Trump's new favorite song is playing 24/7 on his Twitter feed:

_________________________
"You can't fix a problem until you understand what the problem is." Logtroll

Top
#306036 - 03/17/18 03:58 PM Re: Stormy Daniels Suit: It's a Trap!! [Re: NW Ponderer]
pdx rick Offline
Member
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 41017
Loc: Puget Sound, WA

Trump is infamous for going after people on Twitter that he perceives as attacking him. Trump has not Tweeted one iota about Stormy, thus breaking the pattern.

What's different about Stormy that Trump has remained silent? Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 23 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2