Current Topics
congress and the administration
by rporter314
Today at 03:28 AM
At ease, disease. Tharís fungus amongus.
by pondering_it_all
Today at 01:51 AM
Roundtable for April 2019
by pondering_it_all
Today at 01:42 AM
The Mueller Report
by jgw
Yesterday at 08:24 PM
end is nigh
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 04:28 AM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 04:21 AM
war and other stuff
by jgw
05/19/19 05:17 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2019
by pondering_it_all
05/18/19 07:01 AM
Head of CFPB breaks ranks; tries to do job
by NW Ponderer
05/16/19 03:36 PM
Man kicked off Southwest flight for vodka joke: 'You canít say anything to anyon
by Golem
05/15/19 10:42 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by jgw
05/15/19 05:55 PM
Sucker Nation
by jgw
05/13/19 09:18 PM
Army Soldier Falls Into Hawaii's Kilauea Volcano After Straining For Better View
by pdx rick
05/09/19 03:05 AM
Sam
by Kaine
05/06/19 11:52 AM
Trump wanted to free illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities
by Jeffery J. Haas
05/03/19 07:57 PM
Impeach
by jgw
04/30/19 09:07 PM
White House birthday tweet for Melania becomes instant meme
by pdx rick
04/30/19 05:15 AM
Leader of armed militia that held migrants arrested on weapons charges
by pdx rick
04/27/19 12:51 PM
We Finally Learned What a Year in Space Did to Astronaut Scott Kelly's Body
by pondering_it_all
04/24/19 08:50 AM
I wonder............
by jgw
04/22/19 06:55 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16552 Topics
285656 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#306897 - 06/03/18 09:49 PM Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2458
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
Washington, California and Louisiana are all top two primary states. This means that, after the primary, the top two candidates, irregardless of party, will be the candidates in the election itself.

We have a two party system, and setting aside the third party thing, the top two primaries means, exactly, that there may be two Dems, or Republicans, that fight the final battle, not necessarily a Dem and a Republican. This is an important point. Now, the Democrats seem to be fielding a LOT of candidates. On the Republican side, however, they tend to march in lock step and choose their candidate and maybe even two (there is no minimum or limit). The Dems, however, given their current state of internal war, are going field, probably, a minimum of 5 candidates for every job. So, the Dems are going to split their vote a minimum of 5 ways whilst the Republicans might split their vote two ways.

I think the reading probably gets this but, just in case. If the Dem vote was 1000 and it was split 5 ways that means everybody gets 200 votes. On the Republican side if their vote was the same 1000 votes and they split it only two times, they would each get 500 votes, AND the two top slots for the election. The unfortunate thing, for the Dems, is that because they have been unable to heal their internecine battle, they would lose.

I hope I am wrong on this one. I live in Washington state and I fully expect the Dems doing battle to not give an inch, insist in their "rights", and go down in a great ball of flame.

Top
#306906 - 06/04/18 08:33 PM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8427
Loc: North San Diego County
We'll see. In California, the Republicans have multiple candidates too. The open primary system has brought out a lot of nutballs who will not be getting many votes. In races where somebody has clear name-recognition the other guys have a huge uphill battle. I know that most voters do not bother to read anything at all, much less actually research all the candidates positions on issues. Sort of the ultimate expression of "representational democracy" where you elect somebody to make all the decision for you! Flip a coin and choose your winner.

Parties need to change their rules to reflect this new system. I noticed they have a lot of candidates but very few endorsements. I go by positions, party endorsements, and like to see League of Women Voters endorsements.

Top
#306928 - 06/06/18 06:47 PM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8427
Loc: North San Diego County
Turned out okay in California: Zero cases of Democrats being locked out by two Republicans topping a large field of Democrats. But this system of open primaries has some very real problems, like parties helping people run with the other party's label just to dilute the other party's votes. I think the parties will change their rules so only one candidate can run with the party label on the ballot. And that is like having no primary at all, as the party machine picks their one candidate.

In fact they kind of did this by showing party endorsements in the voter information booklet: There were lots of D and R candidates in each race, but only one party endorsement for each party.

Top
#306936 - 06/07/18 03:14 AM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8427
Loc: North San Diego County
In the governor's race Newsom (D) actually helped Cox (R), because he would rather run against a Republican than Villaraigosa (D)! Some Democrats are upset because having two Democrats run for governor (and no Republicans) might discourage Republicans from coming out to vote on the down races.

This "jungle primary" makes it all a lot more complex.

Top
#306942 - 06/08/18 08:41 PM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2458
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
I was wrong about this. If you study the numbers, in the election, I think the really stunning thing was that even though the Dems, in some of the elections, ran a lot more candidates than the other side, there were so many of the electorate voting for the Dem side that they were able to overcome. This kinda gives one hope!

Top
#306956 - 06/09/18 06:23 AM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8427
Loc: North San Diego County
I Daryl Issa's district, Democrats got more than 50% of the votes cast. But a 50.6% to 48% victory is close: The winner in November depends entirely on voters coming out to vote. Democrats shouldn't get complacent now.

Top
#306960 - 06/10/18 03:47 AM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: pondering_it_all]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13679
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
I Daryl Issa's district, Democrats got more than 50% of the votes cast. But a 50.6% to 48% victory is close: The winner in November depends entirely on voters coming out to vote. Democrats shouldn't get complacent now.


Oh Good God no.
If ever there was an argument to take the time and trouble to vote, we're livin' in it right now.
_________________________
"The Left ones think I'm Right, the Right ones think I'm wrong."
Leon Russell - Magic Mirror"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-H1iQ5Y6Eg

Top
#307005 - 06/16/18 10:17 PM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
matthew Offline
newbie

Registered: 03/24/16
Posts: 362
Originally Posted By: jgw
Washington, California and Louisiana are all top two primary states. This means that, after the primary, the top two candidates, irregardless of party, will be the candidates in the election itself.

"Irregardless" is not a word. You mean, "regardless".
.
_________________________
Once, weapons were manufactured to fight wars; today, wars are manufactured to sell weapons

It is far easier to deceive folks than to convince them they are deceived

Top
#307007 - 06/17/18 02:41 AM Re: Dems are going to lose, in Washington, California and Louisiana [Re: jgw]
rporter314 Online   content
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6707
Loc: Highlands, Tx
i prefer the more emphatic sounding "irregardless" to the more passive sounding "regardless" ... to my tin ears of course
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 17 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2