Current Topics
In like a lion... March Roundtable 2019
by pondering_it_all
Today at 06:03 AM
Justice is coming
by pondering_it_all
Today at 05:50 AM
Disaster
by jgw
Yesterday at 06:10 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2019
by Golem
Yesterday at 03:30 PM
What is Neoliberalism?
by logtroll
Yesterday at 01:09 PM
RICO?
by pdx rick
03/16/19 05:09 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by Greger
03/15/19 08:24 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
03/14/19 04:05 PM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by pondering_it_all
03/14/19 08:22 AM
Gov. Gavin Newsom to stop death penalty in California, giving reprieves to 737 d
by pondering_it_all
03/14/19 07:54 AM
He's just not worth it
by jgw
03/13/19 07:32 PM
College Admissins Bribery
by jgw
03/13/19 07:24 PM
Why are Republicans So Afraid of AOC and Omar?
by NW Ponderer
03/12/19 03:48 PM
Political Correctness run amok
by rporter314
03/11/19 09:24 PM
Shots
by jgw
03/11/19 07:41 PM
Manafort Travesty of Justice
by jgw
03/09/19 07:54 PM
Chelsea Manning, meet Paul Manafort, Roger Stone
by NW Ponderer
03/08/19 01:12 PM
The 81 Names
by pondering_it_all
03/07/19 10:01 PM
Kirstjen Nielsen's Disaster
by rporter314
03/07/19 03:04 PM
Oh no! She's coming for our insider trades!
by pondering_it_all
03/06/19 09:56 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16516 Topics
285004 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Topic Options
#309014 - 10/21/18 08:16 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13631
Loc: Whittier, California
Sorry but if we had focused more on Kavanaugh's history of habitual lying, his ethical lapses, his affinity for ridiculous conspiracy theories and his untreated alcoholism, he would not be sitting in the SCOTUS today.
_________________________
"The Left ones think I'm Right, the Right ones think I'm wrong."
Leon Russell - Magic Mirror"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-H1iQ5Y6Eg

Top
#309019 - 10/21/18 11:22 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6674
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Jeff ... you have not been paying attention. We are in an era when corruption is ok with the majority party. Why would a few peccadilloes bother these folks?

It would have been easier to confirm him.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#309029 - 10/23/18 02:13 AM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8302
Loc: North San Diego County
I wonder what was in those 12 complaints about Kavanaugh that Justice Roberts was sitting on during the confirmation hearing.

Ignoring Supreme Court decisions?
No pants under the robe when he gets a hot defendant?
Kegger in his chambers every Friday night?

Kind of boggles the mind to think there must be nine more!

Top
#309030 - 10/23/18 03:59 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6674
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Originally Posted By: source within quote
The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-364 (link is external) establishes a process by which any person can file a complaint alleging a federal judge has engaged in “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts” or has become, by reason of a mental or physical disability, “unable to discharge all the duties” of the judicial office.


"conduct prejudicial" sounds like misconduct and as examples

Originally Posted By: wiki
Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the judge's office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives; accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office; having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case; treating litigants or attorneys in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner; violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct, such as judicial rules of procedure or evidence, or those pertaining to restrictions on outside income and requirements for financial disclosure; and acting outside the jurisdiction of the court, or performance of official duties if the conduct might have a prejudicial effect on the administration of the business of the courts among reasonable people.


as a note of commentary, I will refer you specifically back to the last Senate hearing when J Kavanaugh gave his introductory remarks and allow you to derive your own conclusions as to relevance to actually complaints
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#309041 - 10/23/18 11:45 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8302
Loc: North San Diego County
That tirade did kind of set him up for this: If he fails to recuse himself from any sort of Democrat versus Republican case, he violates many of those standards. If he does recuse himself, the Court is back to 4:4. Sometimes people surprise you. Jeff Sessions was smart enough to side-step going to jail when he recused himself. He obviously observed some bad stuff, and thought: "NOPE"

Top
#309055 - 10/24/18 09:16 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2364
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
Well, we're gonna find out pretty qwick, I figure. Even if he doesn't recuse, with the majority, it may make absolutely no difference.

Top
Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Who's Online
0 registered (), 37 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2