Current Topics
Historic Corruption
by NW Ponderer
0 seconds ago
RoundTable for December 2018
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 05:15 AM
Why Record $1.465 Trillion Student Debt Could Test U.S. Economy
by NW Ponderer
Today at 04:43 AM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by pondering_it_all
Today at 03:42 AM
Yes, John Edwards is a precedent - that is bad for Trump
by pondering_it_all
Today at 03:37 AM
Another Solution
by Greger
Today at 03:20 AM
Justice is coming
by jgw
Yesterday at 10:24 PM
ICE - the new gestapo
by jgw
12/16/18 07:24 PM
What Left?
by jgw
12/16/18 07:17 PM
Archie Moore vs Yvon Durelle, December 10, 1958
by Greger
12/14/18 04:27 PM
Judge orders porn star Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293,000 in attorneys' fees,
by pondering_it_all
12/12/18 09:51 PM
Election Day
by NW Ponderer
12/12/18 03:42 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Golem
12/10/18 09:15 PM
Smart watches: Need Xmas Advice for Wifey
by rporter314
12/10/18 04:32 PM
None of the Above (NOTA)
by rporter314
12/09/18 06:03 PM
Israel negotiating with Hungary on revisionist Holocaust museum
by pondering_it_all
12/07/18 11:22 PM
Brexit Eve
by NW Ponderer
12/04/18 04:26 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Jeffery J. Haas
12/04/18 12:52 AM
Our political elders
by Greger
12/03/18 02:52 AM
Round table NOVEMBER 2018
by pondering_it_all
12/01/18 07:59 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16432 Topics
283294 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#309530 - 11/24/18 07:46 PM National Petition
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2200
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
Here is a wishful thought. We could have a national petition and, if the petition gets x number of signins, the subject will be on the next national presidential election ballot.

The devil, of course, is in the details. I suspect this would have to be run through the internet and that there would also have to be some kind of method for making sure that everybody had only one vote. I suspect might even work. I also have no idea how many signins would be needed to validate the petition. I also think that the number of these would also have to be controlled, how about 5 allowed per election cycle? OR don't control the number of petitions but only allow the top 5, or 10, to pass through to the election ballot.

Top
#309531 - 11/24/18 08:08 PM Re: National Petition [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8081
Loc: North San Diego County
The system is designed on purpose to work more gradually than that. Most states have petition initiatives for their voting. When enough states have adopted something, then it can be passed as law by Congress or made an amendment to the US Constitution. But that is very slow and difficult, by design, so every fad that comes along isn't added. Just look at prohibition, slavery, civil rights, women's suffrage.

Top
#309578 - 11/28/18 06:21 PM Re: National Petition [Re: jgw]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2200
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
What you are saying is absolutely right. My thought would accomplish several things. The first is that people would think they had a say in fed gov. The trick would be to make the number of signers HUGE whilst, at the same time, allowing folks to "have a say".

Think on it. To have a say you can always talk to your elected and your elected will agree with everything and do absolutely nothing. This way, especially if a petition got HUGE numbers of signers attached, would at the very least, put the elected on notice.

I just don't know how one could be started and recognized for what it is. For instance, anybody can, right now, put a petition up and ask people to sign it. There are a LOT of these on the net right now on just about anything one can think of. The trick is to somehow get these into the hands of EVERYBODY.

Anyway, it was a thought.............

Top

Who's Online
1 registered (NW Ponderer), 49 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2