Current Topics
It is time to consider impeachment
by rporter314
0 seconds ago
The Shutdown Is Mitch McConnell's Fault
by rporter314
13 minutes 43 seconds ago
RoundTable for January 2019
by NW Ponderer
Today at 04:22 PM
A Judge Blocked the Census From Asking About Citizenship. Here's Why It Matters
by NW Ponderer
Today at 03:57 PM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by chunkstyle
Today at 11:34 AM
Collusion has now been shown. What now?
by pondering_it_all
Today at 12:12 AM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2019
by Golem
Yesterday at 06:15 PM
Justice is coming
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 01:17 AM
The Green New Deal, explained
by jgw
01/15/19 08:15 PM
Gregory Benford Wins 2019 Robert A. Heinlein Award
by Golem
01/15/19 07:07 PM
Trump's Wall Shutdown IS his policy
by pondering_it_all
01/14/19 06:59 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by logtroll
01/13/19 03:56 PM
GoFundMe Wall campaign collapses: fraud campaign substituted
by pondering_it_all
01/12/19 07:20 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by Greger
01/11/19 09:24 PM
Our Embarrasment of a White House
by pondering_it_all
01/11/19 07:00 PM
by jgw
01/11/19 06:20 PM
The perils of "short-termism"
by rporter314
01/10/19 03:20 PM
The wall, or fence, has been, or is being, or needs to be, built, and Mexico has
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/08/19 09:07 PM
What Left?
by chunkstyle
01/07/19 04:42 AM
by chunkstyle
01/06/19 06:01 AM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16462 Topics
283780 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#309826 - 12/11/18 10:51 PM Judge orders porn star Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293,000 in attorneys' fees,
NW Ponderer Online   sad
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16449
Judge orders porn star Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293,000 in attorneys' fees, sanctions (CNBC). Let me be careful how I day this: Judge Otero, a Bush appointee, is not a bad judge, but, in my opinion, he is wrong about this particular issue, and will probably be reversed. He dismissed the defamation claim (but not the whole suit) on a First Amendment basis. "The judge said that Trump's tweet was "rhetorical hyperbole," and was protected by the First Amendment." The problem is, this isn't a first amendment issue. Trump lied in a tweet. The judge was concerned about political opponents. Stormy Daniels is a private citizen, as is Donald Trump. She is not his "political opponent" (The judge's asserted concern). The question is, was his tweet "defamatory" - and therefore unprotected speech? There are other bases for dismissing the claim, he just picked the wrong one, and, once it is addressed on appeal, that issue can be raised.

#309839 - 12/12/18 09:51 PM Re: Judge orders porn star Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293,000 in attorneys' fees, [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8148
Loc: North San Diego County
Certainly, we must protect politicians right to lie about their opponents. That's a time-honored tradition, and I doubt those other politicians can be hurt by lies. Everybody expects that and considers it hyperbole. But to lie about other citizens and harm them with those lies? That seems like we would be creating a special protected liar class, who could get away with anything. I think this decision must be overturned or a huge amount of turmoil will result. Judges usually look for a way to minimize turmoil.


Who's Online
1 registered (NW Ponderer), 37 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users