Current Topics
SF Board of Supervisors declare NRA a domestic terrorist organization
by perotista
0 seconds ago
What Can Be Done About The Bipartisan Corruption In Our Government?
by Senator Hatrack
58 minutes 3 seconds ago
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 10:08 PM
Global warming predictions
by logtroll
Yesterday at 06:10 PM
Where have all the conservatives gone?
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 02:37 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by chunkstyle
Yesterday at 02:29 AM
Authoritarian to Authoritarian
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 02:27 AM
Government. What is it and why do we need it?
by chunkstyle
09/19/19 05:39 PM
A REMINDER ABOUT FORUM GUIDELINES
by Ujest Shurly
09/19/19 04:34 PM
Emoluments, anyone?
by Greger
09/19/19 02:25 AM
The Departed - 2019
by Senator Hatrack
09/18/19 11:17 PM
What do words mean?
by NW Ponderer
09/17/19 05:37 PM
Republicans to scrap primaries and caucuses
by Jeffery J. Haas
09/17/19 04:58 AM
And we're off and running!
by chunkstyle
09/16/19 12:49 PM
This Might Bite Fox News in the Butt
by pdx rick
09/14/19 04:24 AM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by NW Ponderer
09/13/19 06:08 AM
Live Dorian Feed From Central Florida
by Greger
09/13/19 01:49 AM
Bolton Fired
by pdx rick
09/12/19 06:50 PM
Annex West Bank
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:52 PM
Democratic Actions
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:49 PM
Forum Stats
6282 Members
59 Forums
16691 Topics
289676 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#310649 - 01/30/19 07:13 PM AOL vs. Facebook
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17022
I had an interesting argument with my son, this morning. We were talking about social media trends, like Vine, Reddit, ticktock, and social media "platforms" like Instagram, Twitter, and, of course, Facebook. I opined that AOL was really the original "social media platform" for people of my generation, and he vehemently disagrees. I'm trying to understand his argument, which, I think, is essentially that AOL was a "closed system", rather than "out on the internet" for anyone to see. I disagree with the distinction, but I'm interested in other people's views.

What do y'all think?
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#310663 - 01/30/19 11:19 PM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline

It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14197
Loc: Whittier, California
It pretty much WAS the original "walled garden".
In fact, AOL originally entertained options to try to charge extra for access to "internet" URL's outside the AOL system because some in the hierarchy felt that AOL was more important than "the internet" for all but a few "power users".

Numerous ISP's have tried the same or similar methods throughout the years. Australia's Telstra used to charge exorbitant metered bandwidth fees for anything outside of the Telstra "garden".

As long as one stayed within the curated boundaries of Telstra, it was free.

The original AOL "chat rooms" could be argued to be an original social media platform, I suppose. But that is because anyone could install AOL's AIM messenger app without being an AOL subscriber.

The most hilarious display of AOL being tone deaf to the prevailing winds was when they announced that they were really "a content provider" more than an ISP. Yeah really, because clinging to that sad old dialup was sooooo lucrative, LOL.
And everyone couldn't wait to gobble up all that "great AOL content" hahahaha.
_________________________
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)

Top
#310665 - 01/31/19 03:52 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15343
Loc: Florida
AOL was the primordial goo from which everything else sprang.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#310703 - 02/02/19 07:04 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8734
Loc: North San Diego County
Actually, dialup BBS systems existed well before AOL and offered chat-room capability. Content providers existed in the days of ARPANET but were only available to a very limited few users. As soon as the internet became available, USENET offered users thousands of topic threads in which they could make posts to share with other users. Email was started back in ARPANET days.

AOL just integrated content provision for browsers (http), email, and user posting chat rooms accessed via the same browser, but it was much more limited than USENET. Less confusing too, I suppose, but USENET and email were very simple to use. In fact, USENET and email servers all still respond to simple English text commands. All email and USENET client programs just provide a pretty graphical front-end but communicate with their servers using the text commands!

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 19 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista, ttwtt78640
6282 Registered Users
A2