Current Topics
College debt
by Mellowicious
Roundtable for Summer 2019
by Jeffery J. Haas
Trump Administration Proposes New "Fairness" Doctrine
by BC
07:23 PM
Retired ? Is it what you thought it would be?
by Jeffery J. Haas
05:59 PM
Moscow Mitch, eruption at Salt Lake...
by pdx rick
03:16 AM
And we're off and running!
by Jeffery J. Haas
02:46 AM
Intolerance Of Intolerance
by pdx rick
02:37 AM
The Departed - 2019
by itstarted
01:24 AM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by chunkstyle
09:45 PM
The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist?
by logtroll
12:56 PM
The Challenge of Returning
by BC
11:05 AM
This is American Conservatism
by NW Ponderer
04:51 AM
Good bye?
by NW Ponderer
04:40 AM
Hitler was not a lefty
by pdx rick
03:16 AM
Cuccinelli vs Lazarus
by BC
08/15/19 10:49 PM
The Squad
by Greger
08/15/19 09:47 PM
Daimler starts first Freightliner eCascadia all-electric semi truck deliveries
by NW Ponderer
08/15/19 02:58 PM
Will Hurdís retirement reminds us of the GOPís diversity problem
by NW Ponderer
08/15/19 05:01 AM
Hitler vs Trump
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/14/19 11:41 PM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/14/19 11:24 PM
Forum Stats
6277 Members
59 Forums
16648 Topics
287933 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#310649 - 01/30/19 07:13 PM AOL vs. Facebook
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16814
I had an interesting argument with my son, this morning. We were talking about social media trends, like Vine, Reddit, ticktock, and social media "platforms" like Instagram, Twitter, and, of course, Facebook. I opined that AOL was really the original "social media platform" for people of my generation, and he vehemently disagrees. I'm trying to understand his argument, which, I think, is essentially that AOL was a "closed system", rather than "out on the internet" for anyone to see. I disagree with the distinction, but I'm interested in other people's views.

What do y'all think?
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#310663 - 01/30/19 11:19 PM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline

It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14001
Loc: Whittier, California
It pretty much WAS the original "walled garden".
In fact, AOL originally entertained options to try to charge extra for access to "internet" URL's outside the AOL system because some in the hierarchy felt that AOL was more important than "the internet" for all but a few "power users".

Numerous ISP's have tried the same or similar methods throughout the years. Australia's Telstra used to charge exorbitant metered bandwidth fees for anything outside of the Telstra "garden".

As long as one stayed within the curated boundaries of Telstra, it was free.

The original AOL "chat rooms" could be argued to be an original social media platform, I suppose. But that is because anyone could install AOL's AIM messenger app without being an AOL subscriber.

The most hilarious display of AOL being tone deaf to the prevailing winds was when they announced that they were really "a content provider" more than an ISP. Yeah really, because clinging to that sad old dialup was sooooo lucrative, LOL.
And everyone couldn't wait to gobble up all that "great AOL content" hahahaha.
_________________________
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)

Top
#310665 - 01/31/19 03:52 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15115
Loc: Florida
AOL was the primordial goo from which everything else sprang.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."ó Oscar Wilde

Top
#310703 - 02/02/19 07:04 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8636
Loc: North San Diego County
Actually, dialup BBS systems existed well before AOL and offered chat-room capability. Content providers existed in the days of ARPANET but were only available to a very limited few users. As soon as the internet became available, USENET offered users thousands of topic threads in which they could make posts to share with other users. Email was started back in ARPANET days.

AOL just integrated content provision for browsers (http), email, and user posting chat rooms accessed via the same browser, but it was much more limited than USENET. Less confusing too, I suppose, but USENET and email were very simple to use. In fact, USENET and email servers all still respond to simple English text commands. All email and USENET client programs just provide a pretty graphical front-end but communicate with their servers using the text commands!

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
HumblePi, Blenderfox, Flukeake, Contact Form, Jamesmen
6277 Registered Users
A2