Current Topics
US budget deficit hits $984 billion, highest in 7 years
by Greger
01/26/20 12:52 AM
Is Capitalism doomed?
by Greger
01/26/20 12:26 AM
I just don't get Trump
by Greger
01/26/20 12:15 AM
What should we be doing to adapt to large scale crises?
by pondering_it_all
01/25/20 11:15 PM
ISIS Leader Killed in U.S. Special Operations Raid in Northern Syria
by Greger
01/25/20 06:39 PM
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by Greger
01/24/20 11:15 PM
ReaderRant RoundTable for Winter 2020
by Hamish Howl
01/24/20 02:59 PM
The Departed - 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/23/20 06:10 PM
iranian general qassem soleimani
by CPWILL
01/23/20 05:09 AM
My Obsessive Compulsion
by Greger
01/22/20 07:08 PM
Real Truths
by Hamish Howl
01/21/20 05:38 PM
Warren v. Sanders
by Greger
01/21/20 01:10 AM
Global warming predictions
by Hamish Howl
01/20/20 10:13 PM
All The President's Men
by jgw
01/20/20 09:16 PM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by CPWILL
01/20/20 07:08 PM
Biden's Huge Lead in National Poll of Black Voters, 27% Want Black Running Mate
by perotista
01/20/20 02:00 PM
The Lincoln Project
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/19/20 04:27 AM
Houston Astros or Houston Asterisks?
by pdx rick
01/16/20 03:59 AM
Android support for CHB
by Greger
01/15/20 07:13 PM
Iran - Again
by rporter314
01/15/20 04:15 PM
Forum Stats
6289 Members
60 Forums
16796 Topics
294517 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#310649 - 01/30/19 07:13 PM AOL vs. Facebook
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17220
I had an interesting argument with my son, this morning. We were talking about social media trends, like Vine, Reddit, ticktock, and social media "platforms" like Instagram, Twitter, and, of course, Facebook. I opined that AOL was really the original "social media platform" for people of my generation, and he vehemently disagrees. I'm trying to understand his argument, which, I think, is essentially that AOL was a "closed system", rather than "out on the internet" for anyone to see. I disagree with the distinction, but I'm interested in other people's views.

What do y'all think?
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#310663 - 01/30/19 11:19 PM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
Jeffery J. Haas Online   happy
It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14847
Loc: Whittier, California
It pretty much WAS the original "walled garden".
In fact, AOL originally entertained options to try to charge extra for access to "internet" URL's outside the AOL system because some in the hierarchy felt that AOL was more important than "the internet" for all but a few "power users".

Numerous ISP's have tried the same or similar methods throughout the years. Australia's Telstra used to charge exorbitant metered bandwidth fees for anything outside of the Telstra "garden".

As long as one stayed within the curated boundaries of Telstra, it was free.

The original AOL "chat rooms" could be argued to be an original social media platform, I suppose. But that is because anyone could install AOL's AIM messenger app without being an AOL subscriber.

The most hilarious display of AOL being tone deaf to the prevailing winds was when they announced that they were really "a content provider" more than an ISP. Yeah really, because clinging to that sad old dialup was sooooo lucrative, LOL.
And everyone couldn't wait to gobble up all that "great AOL content" hahahaha.
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#310665 - 01/31/19 03:52 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Greger Online   content

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16029
Loc: Florida
AOL was the primordial goo from which everything else sprang.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#310703 - 02/02/19 07:04 AM Re: AOL vs. Facebook [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 9133
Loc: North San Diego County
Actually, dialup BBS systems existed well before AOL and offered chat-room capability. Content providers existed in the days of ARPANET but were only available to a very limited few users. As soon as the internet became available, USENET offered users thousands of topic threads in which they could make posts to share with other users. Email was started back in ARPANET days.

AOL just integrated content provision for browsers (http), email, and user posting chat rooms accessed via the same browser, but it was much more limited than USENET. Less confusing too, I suppose, but USENET and email were very simple to use. In fact, USENET and email servers all still respond to simple English text commands. All email and USENET client programs just provide a pretty graphical front-end but communicate with their servers using the text commands!

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 24 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan, Chagos
6289 Registered Users
A2