Current Topics
Are both "sides" equally corrupt?
by chunkstyle
Today at 05:08 AM
If ISIS does the unthinkable...
by chunkstyle
Today at 05:02 AM
What is "old"?
by Greger
Today at 03:32 AM
The Trump/Biden/Ukraine thing
by chunkstyle
Today at 01:29 AM
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by perotista
Today at 01:29 AM
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Hyper-partisanship and irrationality
by logtroll
Yesterday at 06:49 PM
Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies
by Greger
Yesterday at 05:44 PM
The Departed - 2019
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 01:12 PM
Where have all the conservatives gone?
by perotista
Yesterday at 12:58 AM
Why do humans fight so much?
by Greger
10/15/19 02:13 PM
Global warming predictions
by logtroll
10/13/19 08:47 PM
Turkey's Erdogan threatens to release millions of refugees into Europe over crit
by pdx rick
10/12/19 07:35 PM
Partisans' Trust in Legislative Branch Has Shifted in Past Year
by perotista
10/11/19 03:37 AM
Trump unleashes ISIS in Kurd Country
by Greger
10/10/19 05:31 PM
SF Board of Supervisors declare NRA a domestic terrorist organization
by NW Ponderer
10/09/19 03:08 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by chunkstyle
10/07/19 02:44 PM
NRA acted as "foreign asset" for Russia ahead of 2016 election, Senate report cl
by Greger
10/07/19 02:19 AM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by jgw
10/06/19 08:05 PM
Quinnipiac Loves Liz Warren
by perotista
10/03/19 02:46 PM
Forum Stats
6282 Members
59 Forums
16712 Topics
290854 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 20 of 63 < 1 2 ... 18 19 20 21 22 ... 62 63 >
Topic Options
#310600 - 01/27/19 02:06 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17097
He's so principled he'll attach any label that furthers his career.

Top
#310604 - 01/27/19 06:19 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: NW Ponderer]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15475
Loc: Florida
He voted for Trump. That's really all I need to dismiss him as a principled candidate or a man that can be trusted to hold office.

It appears a bit of a hubbub is taking place around the Starbucks executive planning to run as an Independent. He aint got nuthin' the Democrats aint got and is likely to be ignored by voters.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#310616 - 01/28/19 04:25 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: Greger]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15475
Loc: Florida
Nate Silver had this to say about Schultz...

Quote:
it’s unbelievably arrogant for Howard Schultz to think that ‘Howard Schultz, as an independent, on a platform of deficit reduction, for president’ is the answer to any question that anybody has ever asked about anything,”


He's also against healthcare reform...

This might be one of those Neoliberals I've heard about.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#310644 - 01/30/19 10:58 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8778
Loc: North San Diego County
Schultz talks about not being able to afford Medicare For All like everybody gets it for free. Currently we don't even get it for free when we turn 65, after a lifetime of paying in. People under 65 would be paying a lot more for coverage (to buy in to Medicare) than they would pay upon reaching 65. Nobody serious actually thinks Medicare For All means free National Health for everybody.

Moving toward that would be very gradual.

Top
#310645 - 01/30/19 04:50 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: pondering_it_all]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15475
Loc: Florida
It appears to me that Shultz feels that Billionaires are under-represented in the Democratic Party.

Quote:
"When I hear people espousing free government-paid college, free government-paid health care, and a free government job for everyone -- on top of a $21 trillion debt -- the question is, how are we paying for all this and not bankrupting the country?"


How, Howard? By taxing rich motherf*ckers like you, that's how.
No wonder he wants Democrats to lose...
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#310650 - 01/30/19 07:20 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17097
I was, frankly, shocked at the "tin ear" responses of Bloomberg and Schultz, really demonstrating that they are no more qualified to be president than Trump. I think both of their campaigns essentially ended today. In brief, they overreacted, lied, and showed their true colors: they THINK they're qualified because they're rich, period. That's not how it works, buds.

Top
#310666 - 01/31/19 04:40 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: Greger]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline

It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14315
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: Greger
Nate Silver had this to say about Schultz...

Quote:
it’s unbelievably arrogant for Howard Schultz to think that ‘Howard Schultz, as an independent, on a platform of deficit reduction, for president’ is the answer to any question that anybody has ever asked about anything,”


He's also against healthcare reform...

This might be one of those Neoliberals I've heard about.


Apparently not, because as we've all been told in the most shrill tones imaginable, any and all Democrats are all neoliberals, merely by virtue of their membership in the party, thus it is wrong and immoral to vote for any Democrat whatsoever.

[/sarcasm] rolleyes
_________________________
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)

Top
#310682 - 02/01/19 03:49 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 41832
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Quote:
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?

It's never too early to discuss getting rid of Fatass. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#310683 - 02/01/19 02:22 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
chunkstyle Offline
member

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 1746
Originally Posted By: Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted By: Greger
Nate Silver had this to say about Schultz...

Quote:
it’s unbelievably arrogant for Howard Schultz to think that ‘Howard Schultz, as an independent, on a platform of deficit reduction, for president’ is the answer to any question that anybody has ever asked about anything,”


He's also against healthcare reform...

This might be one of those Neoliberals I've heard about.




Apparently not, because as we've all been told in the most shrill tones imaginable, any and all Democrats are all neoliberals, merely by virtue of their membership in the party, thus it is wrong and immoral to vote for any Democrat whatsoever.

[/sarcasm] rolleyes


Hmmmm....
Feels like your referring to my posting Jeff. If so, your spinning my criticism of the Democratic Party. We've had neoliberal democratic presidents since Clinton. You may have trudged into a booth and thrown the lever for another back in 2016. To say that theres not a predominantly neoliberal concensus in the Democratic Party is like republicans saying there the Party of Lincoln.
It's really not a subtle concept to grasp. Theirs a range of democrats but the majority and the party organization is predominately neoliberal.
Sorry if that sounds shrill to your ears. Defending my posting, not trying to change your
I'll shut up now.


Edited by chunkstyle (02/01/19 02:28 PM)

Top
#310684 - 02/01/19 02:22 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: pdx rick]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17097
I almost never cite to National Review, but here's a piece that bears reading: The Sham of American ‘Centrism’. It points out that the "centrism" espoused by Schultz and other "Independents" is really a very minority view. It also explains how Trump got to the White House, and where Dems won in 2018. It could be the formula for 2020.

BTW, Corey Booker announced.

Top
Page 20 of 63 < 1 2 ... 18 19 20 21 22 ... 62 63 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 34 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista, ttwtt78640
6282 Registered Users
A2