Current Topics
If ISIS does the unthinkable...
by chunkstyle
0 seconds ago
Are both "sides" equally corrupt?
by chunkstyle
50 minutes 38 seconds ago
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by NW Ponderer
Today at 11:34 AM
What is "old"?
by Greger
Today at 03:32 AM
The Trump/Biden/Ukraine thing
by chunkstyle
Today at 01:29 AM
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 07:55 PM
Hyper-partisanship and irrationality
by logtroll
Yesterday at 06:49 PM
Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies
by Greger
Yesterday at 05:44 PM
The Departed - 2019
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 01:12 PM
Where have all the conservatives gone?
by perotista
Yesterday at 12:58 AM
Why do humans fight so much?
by Greger
10/15/19 02:13 PM
Global warming predictions
by logtroll
10/13/19 08:47 PM
Turkey's Erdogan threatens to release millions of refugees into Europe over crit
by pdx rick
10/12/19 07:35 PM
Partisans' Trust in Legislative Branch Has Shifted in Past Year
by perotista
10/11/19 03:37 AM
Trump unleashes ISIS in Kurd Country
by Greger
10/10/19 05:31 PM
SF Board of Supervisors declare NRA a domestic terrorist organization
by NW Ponderer
10/09/19 03:08 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by chunkstyle
10/07/19 02:44 PM
NRA acted as "foreign asset" for Russia ahead of 2016 election, Senate report cl
by Greger
10/07/19 02:19 AM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by jgw
10/06/19 08:05 PM
Quinnipiac Loves Liz Warren
by perotista
10/03/19 02:46 PM
Forum Stats
6282 Members
59 Forums
16712 Topics
290859 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 30 of 44 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30 31 32 ... 43 44 >
Topic Options
#314338 - 08/28/19 01:55 AM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: logtroll]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1596
Loc: MN
I did not know that the owners of the Berkeley Pit had abandoned it. Nor do I know why they did. It might have been due to the costs of cleaning up the pollution and the resultant medical bills that made the company to go bankrupt and not pay be able to pay for the damages it caused. If that is the situation it is most likely because the owners of companies have limited liabilities when things like this happen. It is unfortunate if that is what happened. However, without that limited liability no one would invest in any company. They wouldn't because no one wants their personal wealth taken for terrible events like these. Would you invest in GM if you were to be held personally responsible every time a GM made vehicle was in a car crash?
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314342 - 08/28/19 02:12 AM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9461
Loc: One of the Mexicos
Yes, Classical Liberal free market capitalism is a train wreck.
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#314344 - 08/28/19 02:28 AM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: logtroll]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1596
Loc: MN
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Yes, Classical Liberal free market capitalism is a train wreck.

That "train wreck" has improved the world's standard of living. Look at what the world was like before 1776, when Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations, to what is like now. Would anyone want to go back to living as people did then? No, the real "train wreck" is socialism. In socialist countries people lined up to buy bread. In capitalist countries there lines of bread to choose from.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314348 - 08/28/19 02:43 AM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9461
Loc: One of the Mexicos
Well, I donít happen to think that you actually know the difference, just like most people. The words simply have some vague meaning that weaponizes them. Thatís why discussion is impossible.
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#314359 - 08/28/19 03:41 AM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: logtroll]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1596
Loc: MN
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Well, I donít happen to think that you actually know the difference, just like most people. The words simply have some vague meaning that weaponizes them. Thatís why discussion is impossible.

Yes, a discussion with a closed mind, like yours logtroll, is impossible.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314369 - 08/28/19 12:20 PM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9461
Loc: One of the Mexicos
Letís try a different subset of issues where I admit to not having a clear picture of the philosophy of Classical Liberalism - if I remember right you did say you are a Classical Liberal, right?

This thing of tariffs - are they an acceptable tool for governments to use to protect free markets?
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#314370 - 08/28/19 12:48 PM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9461
Loc: One of the Mexicos
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
That "train wreck" has improved the world's standard of living. Look at what the world was like before 1776, when Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations, to what is like now. Would anyone want to go back to living as people did then? No, the real "train wreck" is socialism. In socialist countries people lined up to buy bread. In capitalist countries there lines of bread to choose from.

I thought you said there never has been a true free-market Capitalism, yet you enthusiastically credit a non-existent thing with fantastic success using vague and extremely generalized examples. Can you explain, please?
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#314373 - 08/28/19 02:24 PM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: logtroll]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1596
Loc: MN
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
That "train wreck" has improved the world's standard of living. Look at what the world was like before 1776, when Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations, to what is like now. Would anyone want to go back to living as people did then? No, the real "train wreck" is socialism. In socialist countries people lined up to buy bread. In capitalist countries there lines of bread to choose from.

I thought you said there never has been a true free-market Capitalism, yet you enthusiastically credit a non-existent thing with fantastic success using vague and extremely generalized examples. Can you explain, please?

Yes, I did say that true free market capitalism has never existed. The fact that it hasn't does not mean that capitalism has not improved the world's standard of living. What you did is read something into my comment that isn't there. I did not say capitalism's success was due to the existence of true free market capitalism. I just said that capitalism, despite the necessary restrictions on it, has improved the living conditions of the world. To understand my comments about capitalism it would help if you could look at capitalism without your bias against it.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314374 - 08/28/19 02:33 PM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: logtroll]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1596
Loc: MN
Originally Posted By: logtroll
Letís try a different subset of issues where I admit to not having a clear picture of the philosophy of Classical Liberalism - if I remember right you did say you are a Classical Liberal, right?

This thing of tariffs - are they an acceptable tool for governments to use to protect free markets?

Tariffs have been used for two purposes. 1) To protect emerging businesses, as was done in the early days of our country to help them grow and be able to compete. 2) As a source of revenue for our government. Prior to the income tax tariffs were the primary source of income for our government. Are tariffs acceptable? Yes and no. It depends on whether they are being used for, protection or for revenue. Most of the time they are unacceptable because they are a restriction on trade.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314385 - 08/28/19 04:28 PM Re: The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15475
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Most of the time they are unacceptable because they are a restriction on trade.

And in this sea of hopeless disagreement and semantic posturing we see a small patch of common ground.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."ó Oscar Wilde

Top
Page 30 of 44 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30 31 32 ... 43 44 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 41 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista, ttwtt78640
6282 Registered Users
A2