Current Topics
Retired ? Is it what you thought it would be?
by BC
Trump Administration Proposes New "Fairness" Doctrine
by NW Ponderer
College debt
by Jeffery J. Haas
02:22 PM
Roundtable for Summer 2019
by pdx rick
12:24 PM
Moscow Mitch, eruption at Salt Lake...
by pdx rick
03:16 AM
And we're off and running!
by Jeffery J. Haas
02:46 AM
Intolerance Of Intolerance
by pdx rick
02:37 AM
The Departed - 2019
by itstarted
01:24 AM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by chunkstyle
09:45 PM
The Debate: Is Americaís future capitalist or socialist?
by logtroll
12:56 PM
The Challenge of Returning
by BC
11:05 AM
This is American Conservatism
by NW Ponderer
04:51 AM
Good bye?
by NW Ponderer
04:40 AM
Hitler was not a lefty
by pdx rick
03:16 AM
Cuccinelli vs Lazarus
by BC
08/15/19 10:49 PM
The Squad
by Greger
08/15/19 09:47 PM
Daimler starts first Freightliner eCascadia all-electric semi truck deliveries
by NW Ponderer
08/15/19 02:58 PM
Will Hurdís retirement reminds us of the GOPís diversity problem
by NW Ponderer
08/15/19 05:01 AM
Hitler vs Trump
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/14/19 11:41 PM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by Jeffery J. Haas
08/14/19 11:24 PM
Forum Stats
6277 Members
59 Forums
16648 Topics
287923 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#311217 - 02/25/19 06:14 PM Re: Yes, the President can be indicted [Re: pdx rick]
Greger Online   content

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15115
Loc: Florida
One of the hallmarks of fascism is it's ability to rule by minority.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."ó Oscar Wilde

Top
#311252 - 02/26/19 08:11 PM Re: Yes, the President can be indicted [Re: NW Ponderer]
NW Ponderer Online   sad
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 16813
Here's a good encapsulation of the debate over the issue: Can the president be indicted or subpoenaed? (WaPo factchecker). It also includes links to relevant documents and precedents, but not the Starr Memorandum that reaches the opposite conclusion. The important point of the Starr Memorandum is that indictment of, and even trial of the President, is not the same as imprisoning the President (which I think would be prohibited absent removal by Impeachment or 25th Amendment action).

None of these analyses, however, seem to consider the import of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides an "expedited" process for removal of the President, by
Quote:
transmit[ting] to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office[.]
(Emphasis added)
IF the President were indicted (as I think the Constitution allows), the 25th Amendment would provide for at least temporary removal of the President to prevent further malfeasance after indictment. That would also be consistent with the gravamen of both the 25th Amendment and the OLC memo. The 25th Amendment does not specify what constitutes "[inability] to discharge the powers and duties of his office". Perhaps needing to defend a criminal case would constitute such disability?

Top
#311273 - 02/27/19 02:54 AM Re: Yes, the President can be indicted [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8636
Loc: North San Diego County
Or serving a prison sentence.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
1 registered (Greger), 38 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
HumblePi, Blenderfox, Flukeake, Contact Form, Jamesmen
6277 Registered Users
A2