Current Topics
Trump may be ahead!
by perotista
Today at 11:25 AM
covid-19 cure
by rporter314
Today at 03:48 AM
The Far-Right's Civil War aka "boogaloo"
by pondering_it_all
Today at 02:11 AM
RoundTable - SPRING 2020
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 11:13 PM
The Maximum Wage
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
First Bernie Sanders Thread 2020
by logtroll
Yesterday at 08:10 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 05:32 AM
A Thought Experiment about COVID-19
by pondering_it_all
05/26/20 01:45 AM
Is there a free market solution for the pandemic and economic collapse?
by Greger
05/25/20 08:59 PM
Genius: how to make of a surgical mask, an N95-equivalent
by GreatNewsTonight
05/25/20 03:51 AM
The Way We Were
by Jeffery J. Haas
05/25/20 12:46 AM
What's for dinner?
by GreatNewsTonight
05/24/20 08:18 PM
Reinfection of COVID19
by jgw
05/23/20 06:42 PM
Coronavirus: The Plague of The 21st Century?
by Jeffery J. Haas
05/23/20 04:14 AM
Medications that might help against SARS-CoV-2
by GreatNewsTonight
05/22/20 08:58 PM
The open it all up crowd
by GreatNewsTonight
05/22/20 08:54 PM
January 21, 2021, What if...
by pdx rick
05/21/20 04:43 PM
Thorium
by Greger
05/18/20 02:13 AM
Michigan Rep. Justin Amash Takes Step Toward Libertarian Presidential Bid
by pdx rick
05/17/20 05:19 PM
Warp Drive
by logtroll
05/17/20 12:37 AM
Forum Stats
6292 Members
60 Forums
16916 Topics
300091 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 80 of 127 < 1 2 ... 78 79 80 81 82 ... 126 127 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#322550 - 03/07/20 04:15 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: pondering_it_all]
olyve Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/02/06
Posts: 7509
Loc: Athens, Ga.
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
Quote:
It took me a while to get over/accept why 53% of white women voted for a monster.


My mistake. Maybe that 53% bought in to his lies because then they could pretend he wasn't a monster, and they could continue their lifestyle uninterrupted. I was saddened because I thought women were a little more woke that that.
That's a mighty broad brush, PIA. I take it you jest.
Yes there are republican women. And most weirdly are women evangelicals. Go figure. For some reason the religious right, much of it anyway, has gone ape over this guy. I cannot speak to that.

Something about you blaming the whole thing on misguided ("unwoke") women bothers me. Women as a whole DID NOT vote for him.
_________________________

"Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...it's about learning how to dance in the rain."

Top
#322551 - 03/07/20 06:00 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA

Olyve is back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bow , smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#322552 - 03/07/20 06:02 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
One potential candidate has run up the flagpole the idea of a Republican running mate.

Mitt Romney has been floated.
John Kasich
Any never Trump Republican that is open to the possibilities of cutting S.S. And could be instrumental in getting that done.



On the other end I think you canít ignore the Stacy Abrams rumors.

Sanders has me stumped for a V. P. pick


Welp, I thought Bernie had a chance two weeks ago, but he and ol' Joe are neck and neck in Michigan - Bernie Country. Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#322553 - 03/07/20 06:06 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: olyve]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: olyve
... I had to remind myself (stupidly)that women live in a man's world still and sometimes choose to take what they can get however they get it...

On NPR this morning, there was poll showing that many women (40%) are misogynist and think in terms that women should only be in traditional roles. WTH?

Hmm

...and a lot of woman were still mad at Hillary in 2016 for 'standing by her man.' gobsmacked
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#322554 - 03/07/20 06:08 AM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: Greger]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Greger
Quote:
Maybe one of them will throw her a bone and pick her as vice president!


Something like that would be the only way I'd vote for Biden. But Biden isn't really known for throwing bones to progressives. He may choose a person of color, he may choose a woman. Staci Abrams wouldn't be enough to sway me, neither would Kamala Harris. Those are a couple of the obvious answers Joe's team is pondering right now. Warren isn't on the short list, or even the long list.

Vote blue, no matter who. smile

Greger you live in FL, you have to vote. You can't sit this one out. nono
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#322556 - 03/07/20 01:15 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: pdx rick]
perotista Online   content
journeyman

Registered: 09/05/19
Posts: 588
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
One potential candidate has run up the flagpole the idea of a Republican running mate.

Mitt Romney has been floated.
John Kasich
Any never Trump Republican that is open to the possibilities of cutting S.S. And could be instrumental in getting that done.



On the other end I think you canít ignore the Stacy Abrams rumors.

Sanders has me stumped for a V. P. pick


Welp, I thought Bernie had a chance two weeks ago, but he and ol' Joe are neck and neck in Michigan - Bernie Country. Hmm


Michigan is interesting, Sanders had a 25-16 lead over Biden on 20 Feb.

https://news.wisc.edu/battleground-state-poll-1/

But as 3 Mar Biden had taken the lead 29-23 over Sanders.

https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-...imary-election/

How much stock to put into them since they still include Buttigieg, Bloomberg, Warren, Klobuchar etc. is up to you.

Other 10 Mar polling, since 4 Mar to this AM, 7 Mar in Missouri Biden increased lead over Sanders from 12 to 20 points. But in my opinion the worst news for Sanders is on the west coast, the very progressive state of Washington where over the same time period 4-7 Mar, Biden has cut a 20 point Sanders lead down to 6. With no data on North Dakota, Idaho or Mississippi, the remainder of the 10 Mar Primaries, it looks like Sanders might just win one state, Washington. Even there, it looks like a very close thing.
_________________________
It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

Top
#322557 - 03/07/20 01:28 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
chunkstyle Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 2356
Tulsi Gabbard is still in the race by the way. She doesnít seem to count as the goddess mother deems her a Russian agent. DNC rules committee allowed a billionaire to enter the debate stage in Nevada with no thresholds being met under the existing rules to do so.
Tulsi picks up a delegate and has the individual contributions requirement.
Democrats change the rules.
Funny thing about those rules and the people hollering about them.

I guess speaking out against the war industries and their servants gets you blacklisted in the Democratic Party. I think thatís the takeaway rule.



Edited by chunkstyle (03/07/20 01:30 PM)

Top
#322558 - 03/07/20 01:49 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
Tulsi Gabbard is still in the race by the way. She doesnít seem to count as the goddess mother deems her a Russian agent.

Because she IS a Russian asset. She's just there to tell Vlad the DNC next moves.

Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#322559 - 03/07/20 02:29 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: pdx rick]
chunkstyle Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 2356
Based on what Rick?
Clintonite smearing?
Hard evidence?

If your being serious, please explain.
Iíd love to understanding the rational.

Top
#322560 - 03/07/20 04:09 PM Re: Is it too soon to be talking 2020? [Re: chunkstyle]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42737
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
Based on what Rick?
Clintonite smearing?
Hard evidence?

If your being serious, please explain.
Iíd love to understanding the rational.

Her support of Russia and Syria. smile The fact that she's still in the race despite not having a snowball's chance in hell of becoming POTUS. Hmm
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
Page 80 of 127 < 1 2 ... 78 79 80 81 82 ... 126 127 >

Who's Online
1 registered (rporter314), 21 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Superfly, GreatNewsTonight, danarhea, RoughDraft274, CPWILL
6292 Registered Users
A2