Current Topics
Republicans to scrap primaries and caucuses
by chunkstyle
1 minute 11 seconds ago
SF Board of Supervisors declare NRA a domestic terrorist organization
by logtroll
52 minutes 5 seconds ago
Government. What is it and why do we need it?
by logtroll
Today at 09:20 PM
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 09:18 PM
Where have all the conservatives gone?
by pdx rick
Today at 07:45 PM
What Can Be Done About The Bipartisan Corruption In Our Government?
by Greger
Today at 04:41 PM
And we're off and running!
by Ujest Shurly
Today at 11:29 AM
Emoluments, anyone?
by Greger
Yesterday at 05:41 PM
This Might Bite Fox News in the Butt
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 04:24 AM
The Departed - 2019
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 12:29 AM
What do words mean?
by logtroll
09/13/19 12:41 PM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by NW Ponderer
09/13/19 06:08 AM
Live Dorian Feed From Central Florida
by Greger
09/13/19 01:49 AM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by logtroll
09/13/19 01:27 AM
Bolton Fired
by pdx rick
09/12/19 06:50 PM
Annex West Bank
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:52 PM
Democratic Actions
by pdx rick
09/12/19 05:49 PM
President Mean Girl
by pdx rick
09/12/19 01:29 PM
GOP corruption and cheating is beyond the pale
by pondering_it_all
09/12/19 08:09 AM
The Green New Deal, explained
by Greger
09/10/19 04:54 PM
Forum Stats
6282 Members
59 Forums
16690 Topics
289416 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Topic Options
#312768 - 07/04/19 04:47 PM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: pondering_it_all]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15314
Loc: Florida
But if you must become as corrupt as the opposition to win then there's really little point in it.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#312771 - 07/05/19 03:03 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8731
Loc: North San Diego County
The Supreme Court has said it's not corrupt, and they pretty much have the last word on any legal issue. They said it's not nice, but if they wanted it to be illegal they would have said so. Now everybody has to live with it, even if it is morally bankrupt and damages the reputation of the court. Their choice!

Top
#313397 - 08/10/19 11:02 PM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: NW Ponderer]
Senator Hatrack Online   happy
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1414
Loc: MN
Gerrymandering existed before either political party did. It has been used and abused by both of them. Gov. Patrick Henry of Virginia gerrymandered a district in an attempt to prevent James Madison from being elected to Congress. Had Henry been successful we would not have had our Bill of Rights. (Madison is the author of them, with a lot of help and advice.) While the Supreme Court decided that it is not a Constitutional issue it's doing so is not a nail in the coffin of free and fair elections. Gerrymandering does make them more difficult to achieve but throughout American history on the whole we have had free and fair elections. The practice of gerrymandering is much better than what was done in the 1850's in (Bloody) Kansas.
_________________________
May you always walk in beauty.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#313402 - 08/11/19 12:56 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: chunkstyle]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline

It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14166
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
What exactly is being argued about with this latest supposed indignation.

Who is the aggrieved and why is it only focused on this particular aspect of a spectrum of undemocratic practices.....

What's the fuss about really?

Just asking.


Do you fuss about incrementalism, do you fuss about punching left while moving right, do you fuss about parties refusing to listen to the will of the people?

But you're blind to gerrymandering?

:ohsnap:
_________________________
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)

Top
#313403 - 08/11/19 01:34 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: Senator Hatrack]
Greger Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15314
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Gerrymandering existed before either political party did.

And murder existed before there was a law against it. As thinking, evolving beasts we don't say "people have always killed people, nothing you can do about it." We f*cking do something about it.
Supreme court had the chance and chose not to.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#313404 - 08/11/19 03:53 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
chunkstyle Offline
member

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 1621
Originally Posted By: Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
What exactly is being argued about with this latest supposed indignation.

Who is the aggrieved and why is it only focused on this particular aspect of a spectrum of undemocratic practices.....

What's the fuss about really?

Just asking.


Do you fuss about incrementalism, do you fuss about punching left while moving right, do you fuss about parties refusing to listen to the will of the people?

But you're blind to gerrymandering?

:ohsnap:


jeebuz,
A 1 1/2 month pause responding to a post? You really do have a bug up your behind.
What are you trying to say?
The mocking I get but your point escapes me.

Was there one?

Top
#313405 - 08/11/19 03:58 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: chunkstyle]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline

It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14166
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
Originally Posted By: Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
What exactly is being argued about with this latest supposed indignation.

Who is the aggrieved and why is it only focused on this particular aspect of a spectrum of undemocratic practices.....

What's the fuss about really?

Just asking.


Do you fuss about incrementalism, do you fuss about punching left while moving right, do you fuss about parties refusing to listen to the will of the people?

But you're blind to gerrymandering?

:ohsnap:


jeebuz,
A 1 1/2 month pause responding to a post? You really do have a bug up your behind.
What are you trying to say?
The mocking I get but your point escapes me.

Was there one?



Well since you don't think there's much of a fuss, then I can understand you not seeing the point. What I don't get is why you think I necroed an old thread just to pick on you. It came back to life today and I scrolled up to get back in sync with the recent posts.

What's the fuss about? Heh, you figure it out.
The subject is gerrymandering.
_________________________
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)

Top
#313406 - 08/11/19 04:13 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: NW Ponderer]
chunkstyle Offline
member

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 1621
The DCCC is blacklisting campaign shops and vendors from ever doing business with the party if they do business with a primary challenger.- Crickets from you as most everyone else here.

Supreme court hands down a ruling on gerrymandering that goes against one party- nashing of teeth, rending of garments, 'end of democracy!' shouts.

What part of that observation seems incorrect to you?

Top
#313407 - 08/11/19 04:17 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: NW Ponderer]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8731
Loc: North San Diego County
The Supreme Court actually just left it up to the states. More than one state supreme court has said it is unconstitutional because it violates their state constitution. All you need to do is get a liberal majority on your state court and then bring them a gerrymandering case. They will make it illegal in your state.

Existing gerrymanders can't affect any state's supreme court makeup. Some states pick supremes by popular vote and some have the governor pick them. And the governor is picked by state-wide popular vote. So it is entirely possible to outlaw gerrymandering state-by-state.

I think we are going to see the problem with gerrymandering in 2020: When you diddle the district boundaries to win as many districts as possible by 5% it is a disaster when you are down by 10%. There are no "safe" districts. Some heavily gerrymandered states will wind up with zero Republican Representatives.

Top
#313408 - 08/11/19 04:17 AM Re: Supreme Court vs. The People [Re: NW Ponderer]
chunkstyle Offline
member

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 1621
""If the DCCC enacts this policy to blacklist vendors who work with challengers, we risk undermining an entire universe of potential candidates and vendors - especially women and people of color - whose ideas, energy, and innovation need a place in our party," Pressley wrote in a lengthy thread about the issue.

"[W]e cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity & inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities," she added."

Article


I still say it smells of hypocrisy.

Top
Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 44 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista, ttwtt78640
6282 Registered Users
A2