Current Topics
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by perotista
0 seconds ago
First Bernie Sanders Thread 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
6 minutes 49 seconds ago
The latest stock market downturn - No, not coronavirus
by danarhea
Yesterday at 11:16 PM
New Moon
by danarhea
Yesterday at 11:11 PM
Nord VPN user interface for Linux
by danarhea
Yesterday at 11:08 PM
Which party do you belong to?
by jgw
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Trump supporters go nuts over "Sanders"
by Hamish Howl
Yesterday at 09:08 PM
Coronavirus: The Plague of The 21st Century?
by jgw
Yesterday at 06:55 PM
What should we be doing to adapt to large scale crises?
by Hamish Howl
Yesterday at 02:00 PM
ReaderRant RoundTable for Winter 2020
by Hamish Howl
Yesterday at 01:53 PM
Heard any good car jokes lately?
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 05:13 AM
Trump blames stock market loss on Democratic debate
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 02:27 AM
Ever see a self-fulfilling prophecy?
by Greger
02/27/20 07:46 PM
Two men arrested in Montgomery County linked to hate group with history of viole
by Greger
02/27/20 06:31 PM
Above the law: DOJ lowering Stone sentencing
by Greger
02/27/20 04:40 PM
Bloomberg
by Hamish Howl
02/27/20 04:22 PM
Never Trump MEANS NEVER Trump
by Hamish Howl
02/27/20 03:40 PM
Trump, you failed. Put America first. Walk away.
by Ujest Shurly
02/27/20 03:17 PM
Trump campaign says it is suing New York Times over Russia opinion piece
by Ujest Shurly
02/27/20 01:58 PM
Good News!
by danarhea
02/27/20 05:22 AM
Forum Stats
6290 Members
60 Forums
16834 Topics
296139 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 >
Topic Options
#313411 - 08/11/19 12:19 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42388
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
To conserve something is to want to preserve and protect it.
  • Slavery
  • White Superiority
  • Patriarchy
  • White dominance in society
  • White control of government to benefit white citizenry
shocked
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#313412 - 08/11/19 12:22 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42388
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
American Conservatives want to return our government to...

...the 1950s when whites dominated American culture and government and where whites are the majority in society.

smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#313413 - 08/11/19 12:25 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42388
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Anything that is not expressly authorized by it is to be either eliminated or done by the various state or local governments.
  • Women's right to vote
  • Minorites right to vote
  • Gay Marriage
  • Due process for non-whites
  • Women's right to control their bodies
  • The right to own land if non-white male
Thanks for the reminder of why Conservatism is a racist and bigoted ideology, Senator Hatrack. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#313416 - 08/11/19 04:20 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
rporter314 Offline
veteran

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 7069
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Yes I see your belief is we should return to 1790, since almost everything following would have been unConstitutional. Yikes!!! What you believe is the Founders were stupid ignorant men of no vision who would write a document meant to calcify government into another useless instrument of tyranny.

I suggest they were not ignorant nor stupid but men of great vision, who were more than aware of a mercurial society and of technological advances. These men would have considered this in writing a profound document, which laid the foundations for future generations , and would not have constrained men to antiquated laws bereft of elastic interpretations in volatile times.

Originally Posted By: Pres Thomas Jefferson
I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
Get off the crazy train!!! ... dump Trump

Top
#313417 - 08/11/19 04:20 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: pdx rick]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
To conserve something is to want to preserve and protect it.
  • Slavery
  • White Superiority
  • Patriarchy
  • White dominance in society
  • White control of government to benefit white citizenry
shocked

None, absolutely none, of the things on that list are what Conservatives want to preserve and protect.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#313418 - 08/11/19 04:26 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
rporter314 Offline
veteran

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 7069
Loc: Highlands, Tx
The sole intent of all documents leading to the US Constitution was not to limit government by size but to prevent government from enslaving its citizenry.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
Get off the crazy train!!! ... dump Trump

Top
#313419 - 08/11/19 04:35 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
rporter314 Offline
veteran

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 7069
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Slavery is certainly mentioned in the Constitution. As an originalist, do you adhere to those sacred words or have you rationalized to yourself slavery is not good and therefore etc etc. If so, then you are not above interpretation of the sacred text. So how can you maintain originalism with your apostasy?

I think this is the fundamental problem for all "originalists", i.e. they selectively exclude some clauses for interpretation while others they argue are immutable. As a person of principle, how do you reconcile this?
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
Get off the crazy train!!! ... dump Trump

Top
#313420 - 08/11/19 04:49 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: rporter314]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
Originally Posted By: rporter314
Yes I see your belief is we should return to 1790, since almost everything following would have been unConstitutional. Yikes!!! What you believe is the Founders were stupid ignorant men of no vision who would write a document meant to calcify government into another useless instrument of tyranny.

I suggest they were not ignorant nor stupid but men of great vision, who were more than aware of a mercurial society and of technological advances. These men would have considered this in writing a profound document, which laid the foundations for future generations , and would not have constrained men to antiquated laws bereft of elastic interpretations in volatile times.

Originally Posted By: Pres Thomas Jefferson
I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors

That is why our Constitution has Article V. To amend our Constitution to fit our society as it has changed over time. But what has not changed is human nature. By having a written constitution it recognizes and puts limits on the lust for power that is part of human nature. That our Founding Fathers recognized how the lust for power is unchanging is an example of their wisdom.
"The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse."
"Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of freedoms of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."
"As there is a degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and distrust: So there are other qualities in human nature, which justify a certain portion of esteem and confidence. Republican government presupposes the existence of these qualities in a higher degree than any other form. Were the pictures which have been drawn by the political jealousy of some among us, faithful likenesses of the human character, the inference would be that there is not sufficient virtue among men for self-government; and that nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another."
James Madison
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#313421 - 08/11/19 05:02 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: rporter314]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
Originally Posted By: rporter314
Slavery is certainly mentioned in the Constitution. As an originalist, do you adhere to those sacred words or have you rationalized to yourself slavery is not good and therefore etc etc. If so, then you are not above interpretation of the sacred text. So how can you maintain originalism with your apostasy?

I think this is the fundamental problem for all "originalists", i.e. they selectively exclude some clauses for interpretation while others they argue are immutable. As a person of principle, how do you reconcile this?

Our Founding Fathers acquiesced to the existence of slavery with great reluctance. Some them were active abolitionists. The protection of slavery in our Constitution was a shameful compromise that had to be made for it to be ratified. Because they were wise enough to include Article V in it they provided a way to expunge that compromise when the American people realized the evils of slavery. To condemn our Constitution and Founding Fathers for protecting slavery is to judge it and them by today's standards. That is like expecting man to be able to have traveled to the moon once rockets were invented. The quote you posted from Pres. Jefferson and Article V of our Constitution explains why originalists abhor slavery just as much as our Founding Fathers did, even the ones who owned slaves.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#313422 - 08/11/19 05:34 PM Re: This is American Conservatism [Re: Senator Hatrack]
Greger Offline


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16283
Loc: Florida
That there are arguments over the interpretation of the words in the constitution is proof enough that there is plenty of room for flexibility. When actual changes are demanded by a wide majority of voters then it is easily amended. The FFs never meant for it to be like the Ten Comandmants but for it to be a living and breathing document.

I'm what you would call a socialist. There's not a single item in my agenda that would conflict with the Constitution. It's a good document and it's proven to work. Our interpretations probably diverge at... "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States."

You cannot tell me that the FFs ever envisioned worldwide military domination to be the main goal of our government, even during peacetime, to the detriment of the health, education, and employment of the general population.

**EDIT***...or maybe you can but that we argue at all simply illustrates my argument that the words are somewhat ambiguous sometimes and subject to interpretation.


Edited by Greger (08/11/19 05:40 PM)
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
Page 2 of 16 < 1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 >

Who's Online
2 registered (perotista, 1 invisible), 42 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
danarhea, RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan
6290 Registered Users
A2