Current Topics
iranian general qassem soleimani
by CPWILL
1 second ago
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 03:17 AM
I just don't get Trump
by logtroll
Today at 12:41 AM
ISIS Leader Killed in U.S. Special Operations Raid in Northern Syria
by logtroll
Today at 12:40 AM
US budget deficit hits $984 billion, highest in 7 years
by Greger
Today at 12:10 AM
ReaderRant RoundTable for Winter 2020
by logtroll
Yesterday at 07:44 PM
My Obsessive Compulsion
by Greger
Yesterday at 07:08 PM
The Departed - 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
Yesterday at 04:40 PM
Real Truths
by Hamish Howl
01/21/20 05:38 PM
Warren v. Sanders
by Greger
01/21/20 01:10 AM
Global warming predictions
by Hamish Howl
01/20/20 10:13 PM
All The President's Men
by jgw
01/20/20 09:16 PM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by CPWILL
01/20/20 07:08 PM
Biden's Huge Lead in National Poll of Black Voters, 27% Want Black Running Mate
by perotista
01/20/20 02:00 PM
The Lincoln Project
by Jeffery J. Haas
01/19/20 04:27 AM
Houston Astros or Houston Asterisks?
by pdx rick
01/16/20 03:59 AM
Android support for CHB
by Greger
01/15/20 07:13 PM
Iran - Again
by rporter314
01/15/20 04:15 PM
High tech comedy classic
by logtroll
01/15/20 02:24 AM
American Mercinaries and mideast oil
by pdx rick
01/14/20 04:21 AM
Forum Stats
6289 Members
60 Forums
16794 Topics
294375 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#314719 - 09/02/19 08:41 PM UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51?
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14833
Loc: Whittier, California
The UK's Boris Johnson is mulling over the idea of "proroguing" (closing) the UK Parliament prior to the Brexit deadline, in a last ditch effort to prevent the MP's from stopping the hard exit from the EU, or so it seems.

Borrowed from a loyal UK subject:

Quote:
Proroguing parliament before a speech by the queen in which the policy of a new government will be laid out is common practice. So, despite the protests and anger over the move, it is a legal one. The Queen will have no choice but to assent if she wishes to preserve tradition under a constitutional monarchy.

However legal does not mean wise or acceptable. It will likely trigger an immediate vote of non-confidence from the Parliament and the fall of the Johnson Government. After such a fall, would an election occur or would the opposition parties form a coalition government to try and avoid a no deal Brexit?

There is already talk of revolutionary political action like calling a People's Parliament. Such out of doors actions could lead to revolution and in the worst case, a real coup d'etat or a civil war. This is because a sitting People's Paliament could easily reach beyond Brexit to try to limit or abolish rights and privileges enjoyed by the British elites and financial interests since the Middle Ages.

I think it's safe to say that Britain is now on the verge of a constitutional crisis in addition to the Brexit Crisis. Well done lads and lasses. You've right knackered yourselves now.

Cheers and dread.
Evilroddy.


The idea of closing a current session of Parliament and asking for the traditional opening for the next session to be just before Brexit puts Parliament out of his way during the next critical weeks.
It's a sure fire recipe for a UK constitutional crisis, and much more.

Here in USA, the POTUS can legally overthrow the government as per Directive 51, or so it seems.

Quote:
The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (National Security Presidential Directive NSPD 51/Homeland Security Presidential Directive HSPD-20, sometimes called simply "Executive Directive 51" for short), signed by President of the United States George W. Bush on May 4, 2007, is a Presidential Directive establishing a comprehensive policy on the federal government structures and operations in the event of a "catastrophic emergency". Such an emergency is defined as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."


Yeah, it's safe to say that issuing a Directive 51 simply because the Prezzy doesn't like the way things are going might be the end of their tenure in office here in the States....under NORMAL conditions.

But under Trump, ANYTHING AT ALL IS POSSIBLE, and I am fairly convinced that D51 has been discussed rather recently as an option in late 2020, as in "just prior to the November 2020 elections".

In other words, I wouldn't put it past Trump to try it.
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#314733 - 09/03/19 01:57 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16000
Loc: Florida
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#314734 - 09/03/19 02:13 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42253
Loc: Puget Sound, WA

If Fatboy tries a "Directive 51," it's safe to say we would see a watermelon explode on live TV given his extreme unpopulatiry. . coffee
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314735 - 09/03/19 02:26 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16000
Loc: Florida
This little conspiracy theory pops up every presidential election. And every time it goes off without a hitch. The former president flies away in Marine One and the new president walks up the White House steps.

This time will be no different.
Trump is far better suited to being a former president than he is a sitting president. He'll milk it for all it's worth as long as he lives. Because that's who he is. The rallies will continue but with an admission and they will sell out! He can tour with Kid Rock and Ted Nugent. He'll be out grabbing pussy again and living the sweet life.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#314738 - 09/03/19 02:53 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Greger]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42253
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Greger
This little conspiracy theory pops up every presidential election. And every time it goes off without a hitch. The former president flies away in Marine One and the new president walks up the White House steps.

This time will be no different.
Trump is far better suited to being a former president than he is a sitting president. He'll milk it for all it's worth as long as he lives. Because that's who he is. The rallies will continue but with an admission and they will sell out! He can tour with Kid Rock and Ted Nugent. He'll be out grabbing pussy again and living.

You're pro'lly right Greger. Kinda gross thinking about a 75+ old puss-grabber though. crazy
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314741 - 09/03/19 03:11 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: pdx rick]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14833
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Kinda gross thinking about a 75+ old puss-grabber though. crazy


Geez whiz, ageism rears its ugly head on RR now? LOL
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#314742 - 09/03/19 04:14 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42253
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Kinda gross thinking about a 75+ old puss-grabber though. crazy

Geez whiz, ageism rears its ugly head on RR now? LOL

Oh...c'mon Jeff - you're not a day over 61. smile
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314751 - 09/03/19 07:03 PM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14833
Loc: Whittier, California
Welp, looks like the Prezzy-dint can't actually suspend Congress after all.
At least if this article is to be believed...

Quote:
The position of president, in other words, was intentionally designed without the authority to reproduce the 11-year tyranny of King Charles or the five-week suspension of Queen Elizabeth II and her current prime minister.


The author does not however, get into specifics of the law, so we're largely left with only their opinion, or so it seems.
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#314934 - 09/05/19 11:18 PM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 9128
Loc: North San Diego County
All these arm-chair (or mom's basement) alt-right idiots claiming that their kind will lead a revolution to help Trump stay in office, ignore one simple fact: When Trump loses the election, somebody else wins. That person will be the President and Commander-in-Chief, and all the government forces and assets will answer to him. They took loyalty oaths to the Constitution, not to Trump. I doubt anyone but alt-right idiots would volunteer for a treason conviction and penalty.

Top
#314952 - 09/06/19 02:40 AM Re: UK Parliament Prorogue vs. Directive 51? [Re: pondering_it_all]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 14833
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: pondering_it_all
All these arm-chair (or mom's basement) alt-right idiots claiming that their kind will lead a revolution to help Trump stay in office, ignore one simple fact: When Trump loses the election, somebody else wins. That person will be the President and Commander-in-Chief, and all the government forces and assets will answer to him. They took loyalty oaths to the Constitution, not to Trump. I doubt anyone but alt-right idiots would volunteer for a treason conviction and penalty.


Even funnier, the idea that Secret Service would form a detail* to "protect Trump" from being escorted from the premises when the time comes. Yeah right, it would be more like the Secret Service getting into a minor scuffle with Trump's security team, Capitol Police being called and ultimately a team of US marshals if things don't get squared away quickly.

*(yes, I have heard this nonsensical idea floated on other forums)
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
1 registered (CPWILL), 8 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan, Chagos
6289 Registered Users
A2