Current Topics
ReaderRant RoundTable for Winter 2020
by logtroll
0 seconds ago
The Compleat Skywalker Saga (spoilers?)
by Hamish Howl
48 seconds ago
Is Capitalism doomed?
by Hamish Howl
4 minutes 30 seconds ago
What should we be doing to adapt to large scale crises?
by Hamish Howl
7 minutes 20 seconds ago
I just don't get Trump
by jgw
Today at 08:42 PM
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by pondering_it_all
Today at 08:27 PM
Boomers have socialism. Why not Millennials?
by pondering_it_all
Today at 08:10 PM
Growth, hunh, good god yaw, what is it good for?
by Hamish Howl
Today at 02:56 PM
Minimum wage
by Jeffery J. Haas
Today at 04:12 AM
The Departed - 2020
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
US budget deficit hits $984 billion, highest in 7 years
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 11:16 PM
This 1 chart explains the factual political divide
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 02:17 AM
ISIS Leader Killed in U.S. Special Operations Raid in Northern Syria
by Greger
01/25/20 06:39 PM
iranian general qassem soleimani
by CPWILL
01/23/20 05:09 AM
My Obsessive Compulsion
by Greger
01/22/20 07:08 PM
Real Truths
by Hamish Howl
01/21/20 05:38 PM
Warren v. Sanders
by Greger
01/21/20 01:10 AM
Global warming predictions
by Hamish Howl
01/20/20 10:13 PM
All The President's Men
by jgw
01/20/20 09:16 PM
Roe v. Wade Is Under Immediate Threat
by CPWILL
01/20/20 07:08 PM
Forum Stats
6289 Members
60 Forums
16800 Topics
294611 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 10 of 10 < 1 2 ... 8 9 10
Topic Options
#314583 - 09/01/19 06:08 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42281
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Trump is useful idiot for the Russians?

Well...if you have to ask. Yes. smile

Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Is that why he has imposed more sanctions on Russia while he has been our President than Pres. Obama did during his entire administration?

The whole reason why Putin wanted Trump is to lessen the tough economic sanctions that BAMZ!!! placed onto Russia.

Congress passed tough sanctions on Russia during Trump's term, but Trump begrudgingly signed those bills MONTHS after they were passed. What...the...hell...are...you...talking about, sir? mad
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314613 - 09/01/19 08:15 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: pdx rick]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Trump is useful idiot for the Russians?

Well...if you have to ask. Yes. smile

Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Is that why he has imposed more sanctions on Russia while he has been our President than Pres. Obama did during his entire administration?

The whole reason why Putin wanted Trump is to lessen the tough economic sanctions that BAMZ!!! placed onto Russia.

Congress passed tough sanctions on Russia during Trump's term, but Trump begrudgingly signed those bills MONTHS after they were passed. What...the...hell...are...you...talking about, sir? mad

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/05/dont-rehabilitate-obama-on-russia/
https://thehill.com/policy/international...cal-weapons-use
One very liberal source, The Brookings Institute, and a fairly balanced one, The Hill, says you are wrong. Pres. Trump has been tougher on Russia than Pres. Obama was. It might help pdx rick if you could get past your apparent automatic reaction of thinking Pres, Trump is always wrong.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314619 - 09/01/19 08:25 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42281
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Pres. Trump has been tougher on Russia than Pres. Obama was.

...after MONTHS of letting the Congressional passed legislation languish on his desk - Trump finally signed the bills. smile

Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
It might help pdx rick if you could get past your apparent automatic reaction of thinking Pres, Trump is always wrong.

I'm still waiting for Trump to be right one time. coffee
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314641 - 09/01/19 10:17 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: pdx rick]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
Trump imposes new sanctions on Russia over chemical weapons use.
That is the title of article from The Hill. It does not say Trump let Congressional legislation languish on his desk. If Trump did let any legislation languish on his desk after ten days, not months, it is vetoed.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#314642 - 09/01/19 10:36 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
pdx rick Offline
Member
CHB-OG

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 42281
Loc: Puget Sound, WA
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Trump imposes new sanctions on Russia over chemical weapons use.
That is the title of article from The Hill. It does not say Trump let Congressional legislation languish on his desk. If Trump did let any legislation languish on his desk after ten days, not months, it is vetoed.


Oops! Another hole in that right-wing narrative. smile

Quote:
Under sustained pressure from Congress, President Donald Trump has imposed long-overdue, legally mandated sanctions on Russia for its poisoning of an ex-spy in the United Kingdom.

Russian agents were accused of using a banned nerve agent to carry out a failed March 2018 attack on British soil against former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia. The Kremlin has denied the allegations. The attack left the Skripals in a coma and killed another woman.

Trump signed the executive order on sanctions Thursday, more than six months after they were due and a day after a call with President Vladimir Putin.
_________________________
Contrarian, extraordinaire



Top
#314659 - 09/01/19 11:51 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17224
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Originally Posted By: pdx rick
Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Trump is useful idiot for the Russians?

Well...if you have to ask. Yes. smile

Originally Posted By: Senator Hatrack
Is that why he has imposed more sanctions on Russia while he has been our President than Pres. Obama did during his entire administration?

The whole reason why Putin wanted Trump is to lessen the tough economic sanctions that BAMZ!!! placed onto Russia.

Congress passed tough sanctions on Russia during Trump's term, but Trump begrudgingly signed those bills MONTHS after they were passed. What...the...hell...are...you...talking about, sir? mad

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/05/dont-rehabilitate-obama-on-russia/
https://thehill.com/policy/international...cal-weapons-use
One very liberal source, The Brookings Institute, and a fairly balanced one, The Hill, says you are wrong. Pres. Trump has been tougher on Russia than Pres. Obama was. It might help pdx rick if you could get past your apparent automatic reaction of thinking Pres, Trump is always wrong.
Hoo boy.... <moving lectern out of the way, and hobbling high horse.>

Let me begin by quoting your cited Hill story:
Quote:
President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing a second round of long-awaited sanctions on Russia over the Kremlin's involvement in the poisoning of a former Russian spy and his daughter living in Britain.
When did that attack occur? 4 March 2018 (a year and a half ago).
Quote:
Bipartisan lawmakers have criticized the Trump administrationís delay in taking what they say is legally mandated action to follow up on last year's sanctions....
The announcement comes after the House Foreign Affairs Committee's top Democrat and Republican sent a joint letter to Trump earlier this week threatening new congressional action to force action on the sanctions.
A little context seemed in order. As it turns out, it does say it languished on the President's desk.

Secondly, the Brookings article was a reprint of a story in The American Interest - a decidedly neoconservative publication, so dressing it up as "liberal" is hardly persuasive.

Top
#315028 - 09/07/19 06:08 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
Senator Hatrack Offline
member

Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1655
To return to the subject of this thread one of the reasons I am still contemplating my departure is that to reply to the long comments is a tedious process.
_________________________
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary

Top
#315030 - 09/07/19 06:49 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
Greger Offline


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16043
Loc: Florida
See, Senator...you don't need to. You grumbled about "cherry picking" a while back, quoting a single line and replying to it.

Most lengthy posts or "rants" as we call them can be synopsized into a single brief quote. Or maybe one line catches in your craw and inspires you to type out a rant of your own. But most replies need not be more than a line or two.

Rant when you feel like ranting, snark when you feel like snarking, debate when you feel like debating. We'd rather be your friends than be your enemies.

You choose how much time you spend arguing with people who will never agree with you and how much time you spend trying to find common ground with them. That's the beauty of politics....how it all turns out in the end. We're currently pursuing a goal of mutually assured destruction. Does it have to be this way?
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#315031 - 09/07/19 06:50 PM Re: Good bye? [Re: Senator Hatrack]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9750
Loc: One of the Mexicos
I've heard the complaint numerous times, "Do you always have to be right?" After considerable observation and thought, I realized that I don't tend to voice opinions unless I'm pretty sure about them. And I don't get a lot of blowback that needs responding to. I certainly think a lot of crap that is wrong.

One problem with blurting out too many flawed opinions is that other people feel a need to challenge them, which can result in a whole lotta lengthy bloviations back and forth.

I'm only suggesting, mind you, that a person should check their own shorts before trying to pull down someone else's panties, if you don't want a game of grabass...

A real interesting strategy to try now and then is to ask questions instead of habitually making weak claims. Don't you agree?
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
Page 10 of 10 < 1 2 ... 8 9 10

Who's Online
2 registered (Hamish Howl, 1 invisible), 24 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan, Chagos
6289 Registered Users
A2