Current Topics
The Impeachment of Donald trump
by Greger
11/16/19 11:53 PM
RoundTable for Fall 2019
by pondering_it_all
11/16/19 09:28 PM
Revenge of the Human Scum
by pdx rick
11/16/19 07:16 PM
POLL: Will Trump resign or stay and be impeached?
by perotista
11/16/19 02:25 AM
What do words mean?
by Greger
11/15/19 05:13 PM
The Trump/Biden/Ukraine thing
by Jeffery J. Haas
11/15/19 03:43 AM
Apparently Trump wants to buy the UK National Health Service
by pondering_it_all
11/15/19 01:33 AM
Trump required to admit guilt in using Trump Foundation as piggy-bank
by jgw
11/14/19 09:23 PM
Yet another Trump scam
by pdx rick
11/09/19 06:46 PM
Why don't the Dems fight back?
by jgw
11/08/19 09:54 PM
Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies
by pondering_it_all
11/06/19 05:03 AM
Ohio GOP charged with distributing phony sample ballots in election fraud
by pondering_it_all
11/06/19 05:00 AM
And we're off and running!
by pondering_it_all
11/06/19 04:58 AM
US budget deficit hits $984 billion, highest in 7 years
by jgw
11/05/19 08:22 PM
Republicans are publicly spreading the name of purported Ukraine whistle-blower
by pondering_it_all
11/05/19 04:48 AM
Often more accurate than polls
by pondering_it_all
11/05/19 04:29 AM
Public option vs Medicare for All
by pondering_it_all
11/05/19 04:27 AM
Why are the Democrats waiting?
by jgw
11/04/19 10:16 PM
MSNBC’s Touré: Romney Engaging In The ‘N.....izati
by logtroll
11/01/19 08:44 AM
Trump Doings
by jgw
10/30/19 08:11 PM
Forum Stats
6283 Members
59 Forums
16734 Topics
291960 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#315243 - 09/12/19 02:43 PM Emoluments, anyone?
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9536
Loc: One of the Mexicos
Since RR now has Constitutional scholars from both sides of the aisle on board, I think the time is right to discuss the Emoluments Clause and its relevance to the current president:
Quote:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Has Trump committed impeachable offenses under the Emolumants Clause?
_________________________
You can’t solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#315260 - 09/12/19 06:53 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: logtroll]
Ujest Shurly Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/16/16
Posts: 492
Loc: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
Probably. The bank and tax records should indicate one way or the other. Then the impeachment inquiry should prove it.

The hotel in DC, foreign embassies started to book rooms and events after President Trump was elected.

The golf courses, wanting the next G7 meeting to be held at one of them.

Just two possibilities off the top of my head.

Not a Constitutional Scholar by any stretch of the imagination.



Edited by Ujest Shurly (09/12/19 06:55 PM)
_________________________
MAGA, impeach Trump.

Vote 2020

Life is like a PB&J sandwich. The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!

Top
#315268 - 09/12/19 10:12 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: Ujest Shurly]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9536
Loc: One of the Mexicos
I was hoping Hatrack would weigh in on what the Founders had in mind regarding the Emoluments Clause. He appears to have looked into the minutiae of construction of the Constitution.
_________________________
You can’t solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#315269 - 09/12/19 10:20 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: logtroll]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6936
Loc: Highlands, Tx
I am certainly not a Constitutional scholar nor do I know how to spell the same, however, I should have an opinion.

The SC has not ruled on the clause ever. Based on ruling form a lower court I suspect there is no judicial remedy, which implies the court points to Congress for redress.

I think it would be a tough argument simply relying on profits from ownership of a hotel as violation of "emolument clause". However, I also think because of Mr Trump's intimate relationship with foreign leaders, there could be an argument made that such a relationship could also be influenced by financial gain as those leaders rental of rooms for substantial amounts of money.

An example would be Prince Salman of SA, who was involved in assassination of journalist and Mr Trump effectively granting him a pardon. So we have this
Originally Posted By: CNBC
President Donald Trump's hotel in New York City earlier this year reversed a two-year trend of declining rental revenue after members of the entourage of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman booked rooms there

Is there a connection? Is this the proverbial quid pro quo? I don;t know but perhaps the argument can be made.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#315270 - 09/12/19 10:27 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: logtroll]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6936
Loc: Highlands, Tx
I dunno. Wasn't it the future Pres John Adams who proposed naming the executive king.

Suppose we called Mr Trump King for a Day. Do you think he would resign because he achieved all there was to achieve?
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#315272 - 09/13/19 01:00 AM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: rporter314]
Greger Online   content

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15641
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Suppose we called Mr Trump King for a Day.


I've got an even better idea! Let's vote his ass out and call him Former President Trump.

Apparently Donald Trump recognized that there was no law that said he had to divest of his investments and so he didn't.
And he has every right to make money from them. It's only natural that he would encourage visitors to stay at his properties.

Perhaps corruption has been so rampant throughout our entire history that the emoluments clause has been intentionally ignored.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#315298 - 09/13/19 04:04 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: Greger]
Greger Online   content

Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 15641
Loc: Florida


Trump Must Face Emoluments Claims, as 2nd Circuit Revives Lawsuit More
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."— Oscar Wilde

Top
#315315 - 09/13/19 11:15 PM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: logtroll]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17153
I have a very strong opinion (shocked? I didn't think so). I'll say that my opinion is shaped by scholars, and that is that the framers had a very broad opinion about what constituted emoluments, as foreign influence and corruption were top of mind when creating the office of President.

The 2nd circuit reinstated the emoluments case. Appeals court allows Trump emoluments case to move forward (The Hill).

Top
#315318 - 09/14/19 01:24 AM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: logtroll]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17153
Oops. I didn't realized it had already been posted.

Top
#315334 - 09/14/19 05:49 AM Re: Emoluments, anyone? [Re: Greger]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 17153
Originally Posted By: Greger
I've got an even better idea! Let's vote his ass out and call him Former President Trump.
I'd prefer to call him prisoner 274598.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 25 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Karen Haas, Snarky_Politics, Moot, Ikari, perotista
6283 Registered Users
A2