Current Topics
Bro or NOT Bro?
by Jeffery J. Haas
0 seconds ago
ReaderRant RoundTable for Winter 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
4 minutes 52 seconds ago
First Bernie Sanders Thread 2020
by CPWILL
Today at 12:06 AM
Growth, hunh, good god yaw, what is it good for?
by CPWILL
Yesterday at 11:37 PM
Democrating Efforts
by CPWILL
Yesterday at 11:23 PM
Bloomberg
by chunkstyle
Yesterday at 09:51 PM
What should we be doing to adapt to large scale crises?
by pondering_it_all
Yesterday at 08:56 PM
Why not?
by jgw
Yesterday at 07:15 PM
Thorium Reactor
by jgw
Yesterday at 07:05 PM
Ahhhhhhhh - the perfection of Capitalism
by jgw
02/16/20 09:43 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by pondering_it_all
02/15/20 10:08 PM
Prognostications on the demise of Herr Dicktater
by logtroll
02/15/20 04:10 PM
Iowa caucuses fail dismally.
by Greger
02/14/20 09:43 PM
Biden's Huge Lead in National Poll of Black Voters, 27% Want Black Running Mate
by Greger
02/13/20 07:17 PM
Above the law: DOJ lowering Stone sentencing
by pondering_it_all
02/12/20 09:07 PM
The Departed - 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
02/12/20 05:30 PM
Android support for CHB
by Jeffers
02/09/20 07:54 AM
Romney
by jgw
02/08/20 07:49 PM
All The President's Men
by Greger
02/08/20 07:38 PM
Biden(s)
by pondering_it_all
02/07/20 10:53 PM
Forum Stats
6289 Members
60 Forums
16818 Topics
295617 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 62 of 114 < 1 2 ... 60 61 62 63 64 ... 113 114 >
Topic Options
#318839 - 12/11/19 12:15 AM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: logtroll]
perotista Offline
newbie

Registered: 09/05/19
Posts: 321
We're closing in on a month's of hearings. Here is the public's response to those hearings by comparing 13 Nov numbers when the hearings began to today's. There's really been little change except the hardening of views whether Trump should be impeached and removed or not. Make of these numbers what you will.

Impeachment hearings began on 13 Nov 2019 vs. 10 Dec 2019
Trumpís approval 13 Nov 43.9%, 10 Dec 44.6%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

13 Nov Democrats for impeachment and removal 82%, 10 Dec Democrats for impeachment and removal 86%.
13 Nov Republicans for impeachment and removal 12%, 10 Dec Republicans for impeachment and removal 7%.
13 Nov Independents for impeachment and removal 38%, 10 Dec Independents for impeachment and removal 44%.
13 Nov Democrats against impeachment and removal 6%, 10 Dec Democrats against impeachment and removal 9%.
13 Nov Republicans against impeachment and removal 80%, 10 Dec Republicans against impeachment and removal 89%.
13 Nov Independents against impeachment and removal 39%, 10 Dec Independents against impeachment and removal 45%.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls...trump-6957.html
_________________________
It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

Top
#318840 - 12/11/19 12:41 AM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: perotista]
Jeffery J. Haas Online   happy
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 15038
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: perotista
We're closing in on a month's of hearings. Here is the public's response to those hearings by comparing 13 Nov numbers when the hearings began to today's. There's really been little change except the hardening of views whether Trump should be impeached and removed or not. Make of these numbers what you will.

Impeachment hearings began on 13 Nov 2019 vs. 10 Dec 2019
Trumpís approval 13 Nov 43.9%, 10 Dec 44.6%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

13 Nov Democrats for impeachment and removal 82%, 10 Dec Democrats for impeachment and removal 86%.
13 Nov Republicans for impeachment and removal 12%, 10 Dec Republicans for impeachment and removal 7%.
13 Nov Independents for impeachment and removal 38%, 10 Dec Independents for impeachment and removal 44%.
13 Nov Democrats against impeachment and removal 6%, 10 Dec Democrats against impeachment and removal 9%.
13 Nov Republicans against impeachment and removal 80%, 10 Dec Republicans against impeachment and removal 89%.
13 Nov Independents against impeachment and removal 39%, 10 Dec Independents against impeachment and removal 45%.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls...trump-6957.html





Not all that much different than the dynamic in 72-74-74 if you remember. Then suddenly...blammo, the dam broke and Nixon impeachment support spiked dramatically.

People finally figured out that we were in trouble.
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#318842 - 12/11/19 03:20 AM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
chunkstyle Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 2114
Iím not speaking for you Jeff

Iím speaking for myself.

Iím saying many argue that authoritarianism canít exist with socialism. I agree with that. Itís a mischaracterization like dry water. A contradiction of terms. What may have started out as a socialist enterprise can mutate into something else altogether.


Itís also not uncommon for reactionary politics to occur within a state when external political forces are bearing down from without. Hell, look at the amount of state violence weíve done since the Saudis threw jets into the towers. Whatís it up to now? Half a million dead? A million? Point being, external forces can effect internal politics.

If socialist countries collapse into authoritarian governments should the external forces bear any responsibility for that transformation?

Whatís the problem bringing it up?

Top
#318844 - 12/11/19 04:40 AM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: chunkstyle]
Jeffery J. Haas Online   happy
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 15038
Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
Iím not speaking for you Jeff

Iím speaking for myself.

Iím saying many argue that authoritarianism canít exist with socialism. I agree with that. Itís a mischaracterization like dry water. A contradiction of terms. What may have started out as a socialist enterprise can mutate into something else altogether.


Itís also not uncommon for reactionary politics to occur within a state when external political forces are bearing down from without. Hell, look at the amount of state violence weíve done since the Saudis threw jets into the towers. Whatís it up to now? Half a million dead? A million? Point being, external forces can effect internal politics.

If socialist countries collapse into authoritarian governments should the external forces bear any responsibility for that transformation?

Whatís the problem bringing it up?




Stop gaslighting, it's not a good look for you.
I took issue with this:

Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
"Just as they did here. You don't see any do you?"


And none of what we did, or might have done, or attempted to do elsewhere is going to cause me to accept what Putin is attempting to do to us right now.

Thanks.
_________________________
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com

Top
#318853 - 12/11/19 01:31 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
perotista Offline
newbie

Registered: 09/05/19
Posts: 321
Originally Posted By: Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted By: perotista
We're closing in on a month's of hearings. Here is the public's response to those hearings by comparing 13 Nov numbers when the hearings began to today's. There's really been little change except the hardening of views whether Trump should be impeached and removed or not. Make of these numbers what you will.

Impeachment hearings began on 13 Nov 2019 vs. 10 Dec 2019
Trumpís approval 13 Nov 43.9%, 10 Dec 44.6%

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

13 Nov Democrats for impeachment and removal 82%, 10 Dec Democrats for impeachment and removal 86%.
13 Nov Republicans for impeachment and removal 12%, 10 Dec Republicans for impeachment and removal 7%.
13 Nov Independents for impeachment and removal 38%, 10 Dec Independents for impeachment and removal 44%.
13 Nov Democrats against impeachment and removal 6%, 10 Dec Democrats against impeachment and removal 9%.
13 Nov Republicans against impeachment and removal 80%, 10 Dec Republicans against impeachment and removal 89%.
13 Nov Independents against impeachment and removal 39%, 10 Dec Independents against impeachment and removal 45%.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls...trump-6957.html





Not all that much different than the dynamic in 72-74-74 if you remember. Then suddenly...blammo, the dam broke and Nixon impeachment support spiked dramatically.

People finally figured out that we were in trouble.


The official impeachment hearings on Nixon began 9 May 1974 although the house gave the judiciary committee permission to investigate on 6 Feb 1974. So 9 May 1974 equates to 13 Nov 2019 when both official hearings on impeachment began. At least in my mind.

At the end of May 1974 after the official or formal hearings begun, 3 weeks worth, you can compare the numbers Nixon Democrats for impeachment and removal 59% for, 27% against to Trump's Democrats for 86%, 9% against. Republicans for impeachment and removal Nixon, 19%, against 70%, Trump, for 7%, against 89%. Independents for impeachment and removal 43%, against 42%, Trump 44% for, 45% against.

Above is comparing the numbers after 3 weeks of formal, official hearings on Nixon vs. 4 weeks for Trump.

Now I realize we're talking two different eras, Nixon and Trump's. Back in 1974 we weren't as polarized as we are today and there wasn't the record breaking ultra high partisanship either.

Another huge difference if Nixon's had gone to trial in the senate, the Democrats needed only 9 GOP senators to vote to convict and remove. The Democrats controlled the senate along with the House. Today, the Democrats will need at least 20 Republican senators, more than double Nixon's amount. I think that is a pipe dream in today's polarized and I will use the word hateful of the other party environment. I personally don't think all 47 democrats will vote to convict and remove. I can see two who may not. That means 22 Republican senators.

With me, it's all about the numbers. Numbers have no personal feelings, they state what they state. Now other may interpret them differently, that's normal.

Once the articles of impeachment are passed by the current House, we then can compare numbers with those of 30 July 1974 when the House passed three articles of impeachment against Nixon.
_________________________
It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

Top
#318855 - 12/11/19 02:18 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
chunkstyle Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 2114
Could you provide me with your definition of what gas lighting means to you? I'm not convinced you are using it properly.
I think you've found a good insult and are overusing it now.

Waddya do when someone likes a meal you don't. Do you tell them to stop gas lighting you?

I don't see the absence of left wing political parties in the U.S. being related to what you imagine Putin is 'trying to do to us'.


Bill Clinton got paid 500k for a speech in Moscow in 2015. Podesta worked for Manafort in the Ukraine. I dont believe in simple narratives about 'what Putin is trying to do to us'. It does make for thrilling TV programming. I'll admit to that.


Edited by chunkstyle (12/11/19 03:26 PM)

Top
#318859 - 12/11/19 03:24 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: perotista]
chunkstyle Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 10/02/07
Posts: 2114
So when's the betting?
My money's on No Conviction.

Which (for me Jeff) raises two questions:

What was the rational to try an elected president for... well... procedural (?) type violations and not others like emoluments?

What will the ramifications be for this course of action democrats are pursuing?

Top
#318860 - 12/11/19 04:51 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: chunkstyle]
logtroll Offline
veteran

Registered: 04/26/10
Posts: 9852
Loc: One of the Mexicos
I was told once that a way to persuade people to do what you want is to first light a fire under them, then give them a bucket of water to put it out with.

I think we're ready for the bucket of water, Chunks.
_________________________
You canít solve a problem without first understanding what the problem is.

Top
#318863 - 12/11/19 05:06 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: chunkstyle]
Greger Offline


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16210
Loc: Florida
Quote:
So when's the betting?
My money's on No Conviction.


There was never any chance of conviction.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#318868 - 12/11/19 06:02 PM Re: The Impeachment of Donald trump [Re: chunkstyle]
rporter314 Offline
veteran

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 7067
Loc: Highlands, Tx
I think I have finally come to the realization why Republicans say and believe there is not a basis for impeachment and it sorta touches on your comments.

Emolunemts is a tough case to prove (and it is going to be even tougher in court), ergo it was not included. Likewise the case for obstruction of justice (as a salient stand alone item) from the Mueller Report.

The current set of allegations is clear cut. Mr Trump did indeed leverage WH meeting and military aid for investigations into the Bidens and 2016 election theories. And it is clear he did obstruct Congress in their mandated impeachment inquiry.

Now for the bad news. Republicans do not believe these rise to the level of impeachment because neither is a crime. Let me repeat .... neither is a crime. They believe only crimes are impeachable. So in order to make a dent in their ranks, the prosecutors have to prove to Republicans a crime has been committed. The only thing which comes to mind is the possible FEC violation of solicitation of foreign aid in an election.

Unless they focus on the possible criminal act, I predict they do not have a chance of changing anyone's mind.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
Get off the crazy train!!! ... dump Trump

Top
Page 62 of 114 < 1 2 ... 60 61 62 63 64 ... 113 114 >

Who's Online
1 registered (Jeffery J. Haas), 51 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan, Chagos
6289 Registered Users
A2