Current Topics
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by perotista
Today at 08:49 PM
What happens if the election doesn't settle due to voting problems?
by jgw
Today at 07:31 PM
RoundTable for Summer 2020
by logtroll
Today at 01:30 PM
Trump says he opposes funding USPS because of mail-in voting
by pondering_it_all
Today at 05:21 AM
Coronavirus: The Plague of The 21st Century?
by Irked
Yesterday at 06:37 PM
Medications that might help against SARS-CoV-2
by Greger
Yesterday at 12:46 AM
Why Not?
by jgw
08/12/20 06:36 PM
Lists of Trump actions
by Greger
08/10/20 04:38 AM
Portland. A Turning Point?
by jgw
08/09/20 06:54 PM
Normal Stuff
by pondering_it_all
08/03/20 10:07 PM
A possible solution to rental problems.
by Irked
08/01/20 12:21 AM
Ongoing Slavery
by jgw
07/31/20 05:06 PM
The Departed - 2020
by pondering_it_all
07/29/20 01:33 AM
Seattle had a Riot!
by jgw
07/28/20 06:17 PM
The Boogaloo Bois
by pondering_it_all
07/25/20 08:08 PM
Collections
by Greger
07/24/20 11:08 PM
There needs to be a ‘real reckoning’ for Trump’s abuses if Biden wins
by pondering_it_all
07/24/20 09:35 PM
Deranged Trump supporter suspected in murdering son of judge
by Greger
07/24/20 05:54 PM
What is the purpose of Capitalism?
by logtroll
07/24/20 12:07 PM
Chad Wolf
by pdx rick
07/24/20 03:54 AM
Forum Stats
6292 Members
60 Forums
16980 Topics
301885 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#319747 - 01/07/20 04:42 AM Re: Trump and our Military (A legal question) [Re: rporter314]
perotista Offline
journeyman

Registered: 09/05/19
Posts: 730
Far as I know the SCOTUS has never ruled on the WPA, so it may or may not be constitutional. There pretty convincing arguments on both sides of this issue. Yeah, Obama did say the WPA didn't apply to him.
_________________________
It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

Top
#319749 - 01/07/20 02:45 PM Re: Trump and our Military (A legal question) [Re: rporter314]
Hamish Howl Offline
journeyman

Registered: 11/21/19
Posts: 608
Loc: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted By: rporter314
It's clear of course that military engagements are hostile, however, were the actions taken by the Obama administration covered by the WPA? I recollect two theories on this. One was the law may have been unConstitutional, and the other was what Pres Obama was doing was not covered by the law.

I suspect this is a question for the courts to parse the language and for the writers to offer their intent.

Did the Founders envision a world where there are so many complexities and nuances to consider in what for them was a much simpler time.


They in fact did. Which is why amendments are a thing.

The WPA should be an amendment, because as it stands, it flies in the face of the constitution.

The WPA exists mostly because it got really tiring not being able to do what the [censored] we want whenever the [censored] we want to do it. It is one of the three major signs of the decay of our republic.
_________________________
What can we do to help you stop screaming?

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Who's Online
0 registered (), 29 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Superfly, GreatNewsTonight, danarhea, RoughDraft274, CPWILL
6292 Registered Users
A2