Current Topics
Alternate Reality
by Greger
10:21 PM
What is the value of a human life?
by pondering_it_all
08:26 PM
RoundTable - SPRING 2020
by logtroll
08:20 PM
Coronavirus: The Plague of The 21st Century?
by pondering_it_all
08:08 PM
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by pondering_it_all
05:32 PM
First Bernie Sanders Thread 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
04:31 PM
The Departed - 2020
by Jeffery J. Haas
04:24 AM
My vote will be for Biden, and this is why
by perotista
03:18 AM
FISA IG Report
by pondering_it_all
11:28 PM
Duty
by Jeffery J. Haas
10:47 PM
I wonder what could have happened to our stockpiles of medical stuff?
by Jeffery J. Haas
07:30 PM
Underclass
by Jeffery J. Haas
07:07 PM
Green New Deal
by logtroll
03/31/20 11:42 PM
Killing bacteria and virus with ozone
by pondering_it_all
03/31/20 12:23 AM
Fox news worred over getting sued
by pondering_it_all
03/30/20 10:04 PM
ventilators
by pondering_it_all
03/30/20 12:46 AM
The Debate: Is America’s future capitalist or socialist?
by Greger
03/30/20 12:42 AM
Trump really doesn't
by pondering_it_all
03/29/20 07:52 PM
small nuclear reactors (SMR)
by jgw
03/27/20 06:49 PM
DOJ seeks new emergency powers amid coronavirus pandemic
by Hamish Howl
03/25/20 07:22 PM
Forum Stats
6290 Members
60 Forums
16860 Topics
297709 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#320160 - 01/19/20 04:39 AM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: Greger]
CPWILL Offline
newbie

Registered: 12/26/19
Posts: 201
Originally Posted By: Greger
Hide and watch, pardner, she's toast.


ENTIRELY possible. I think, ultimately, it's likely - her brand here is not as solid as Bernie's. I simply note that that is not a foregone conclusion at this point, and that she retains powerful advocates in her corner. If she loses the CNN crowd, I agree, she's in real trouble.
_________________________
Winter Is Coming

Top
#320164 - 01/19/20 05:34 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: CPWILL]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16486
Loc: Florida
I tend not to be wishy washy in my opinions. Toast. I expect to see Buttigieg pass her in national polls soon. Or Bloomberg.
And with voting beginning soon it will be the kiss of death for her. There's no time to recover now.

I was hoping Biden might begin to fade a bit by now but it looks like he'll be losing to Trump in November. Democrats are going to be terribly upset. I'ma laugh my ass off...
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#320167 - 01/19/20 05:54 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: logtroll]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 3050
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
If Bernie and Warren fixed their split one of them could win the election. If Bernie gets it he will lose the election. He simply has too much baggage and that title of Socialist doesn't help even a little bit. He is fair game. I have heard that the Republicans, right now, have a plan to get him the nod by voting for him in every primary that they can vote in. They would LOVE to see him run!

Now, about conservatives and Trump. The current Republican party is the party of Trump. Conservatives that vote for him do so holding their noses but they WILL vote for him. They consider, with some reason, the hate a declared Socialist. Sorry, its just the way it is. I have no problem with anybody supporting whoever they care to, its their right just as its my right to not support who they support. The Warren vs. Sanders thing is kinda helpful, from my standpoint, because they will split that vote and neither will get the nod.

I think its kindofa shame. The far left "Democratic Socialists" will, I believe, be responsible for giving Trump another term. Its really too bad. They had a chance to run and not scare away the independents, etc. but, instead, just had to run their mouths and spout absolutely nonsensical promises that cannot be kept. The reason for that is the incredible debt and payments thereof. This is not rocket science but a simple fact.

From my standpoint, wanting Trump gone more than any other thing for 2020 stands. My hope is that even the Democratic Socialists will understand that and vote Democratic regardless of who is the candidate for the Dems. Anybody who is not on board for that will be, as far as I am concerned, be responsible for the possible loss of Democracy in America. I know, its a kinda extreme position but I got lots of fellow travelers on this one and I believe our concerns have reason.

Just saying...............

Top
#320171 - 01/19/20 06:53 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: jgw]
CPWILL Offline
newbie

Registered: 12/26/19
Posts: 201
Originally Posted By: jgw
If Bernie and Warren fixed their split one of them could win the election. If Bernie gets it he will lose the election. He simply has too much baggage and that title of Socialist doesn't help even a little bit. He is fair game. I have heard that the Republicans, right now, have a plan to get him the nod by voting for him in every primary that they can vote in. They would LOVE to see him run!

Now, about conservatives and Trump. The current Republican party is the party of Trump. Conservatives that vote for him do so holding their noses but they WILL vote for him. They consider, with some reason, the hate a declared Socialist. Sorry, its just the way it is. I have no problem with anybody supporting whoever they care to, its their right just as its my right to not support who they support. The Warren vs. Sanders thing is kinda helpful, from my standpoint, because they will split that vote and neither will get the nod.

I think its kindofa shame. The far left "Democratic Socialists" will, I believe, be responsible for giving Trump another term. Its really too bad. They had a chance to run and not scare away the independents, etc. but, instead, just had to run their mouths and spout absolutely nonsensical promises that cannot be kept. The reason for that is the incredible debt and payments thereof. This is not rocket science but a simple fact.

From my standpoint, wanting Trump gone more than any other thing for 2020 stands. My hope is that even the Democratic Socialists will understand that and vote Democratic regardless of who is the candidate for the Dems. Anybody who is not on board for that will be, as far as I am concerned, be responsible for the possible loss of Democracy in America. I know, its a kinda extreme position but I got lots of fellow travelers on this one and I believe our concerns have reason.

Just saying...............


You sound like me in 2012 frown. Here's hoping you don't end up as bitter as I did.
_________________________
Winter Is Coming

Top
#320174 - 01/19/20 07:42 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: CPWILL]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16486
Loc: Florida
I'm perfectly fine with a second term for Trump. If Democrats can't nominate a progressive candidate then a second Trump term works better for me than Biden or some other neoliberal candidate.

Contrary to what jgw says, I believe that Sanders will inspire non voting independents who lean left to vote by the millions. The very people he accuses of costing Clinton the election will come out in droves to vote for him. It's not my worry if the vote blue no matter who crowd decides not to vote. Because SOCIALIZMS. Wooden that be a whooot! If the rightie dems sat it out and cost Sanders the election.

See, I'm not a big Bernie fan...I've got serious doubts about his executive skills and serious doubts that he will be successful as a president. But right now, he's probably the best of the batch as far as moving my agenda forward. A second term for Trump might move it forward faster.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#320187 - 01/19/20 09:57 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: Greger]
CPWILL Offline
newbie

Registered: 12/26/19
Posts: 201
Originally Posted By: Greger
I'm perfectly fine with a second term for Trump. If Democrats can't nominate a progressive candidate then a second Trump term works better for me than Biden or some other neoliberal candidate.

Contrary to what jgw says, I believe that Sanders will inspire non voting independents who lean left to vote by the millions. The very people he accuses of costing Clinton the election will come out in droves to vote for him. It's not my worry if the vote blue no matter who crowd decides not to vote. Because SOCIALIZMS. Wooden that be a whooot! If the rightie dems sat it out and cost Sanders the election.

See, I'm not a big Bernie fan...I've got serious doubts about his executive skills and serious doubts that he will be successful as a president. But right now, he's probably the best of the batch as far as moving my agenda forward. A second term for Trump might move it forward faster.


David French makes a similar argument, but, I'm curious about that last sentence - how do you mean?
_________________________
Winter Is Coming

Top
#320188 - 01/20/20 12:01 AM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: CPWILL]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16486
Loc: Florida
Every day that Trump is in office he does more and more damage to the Republican Party. It's kind of a death by a thousand cuts thing.

Beyond that I see Biden as a single term do nothing president. Not popular with Democrats and much maligned by Republicans and the press. He will be defeated in 2024 by a Republican who will likely serve two terms. It will be 2032 before Democrats get another shot at it.

A second Trump term won't be as successful as the first, or as pretty. It'll be easy to elect a progressive on Trump's heels in 2024, then Democrats will hold the White House until 2032 and beyond.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#320189 - 01/20/20 12:09 AM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: Greger]
CPWILL Offline
newbie

Registered: 12/26/19
Posts: 201
Originally Posted By: Greger
Every day that Trump is in office he does more and more damage to the Republican Party. It's kind of a death by a thousand cuts thing.

Beyond that I see Biden as a single term do nothing president. Not popular with Democrats and much maligned by Republicans and the press. He will be defeated in 2024 by a Republican who will likely serve two terms. It will be 2032 before Democrats get another shot at it.

A second Trump term won't be as successful as the first, or as pretty. It'll be easy to elect a progressive on Trump's heels in 2024, then Democrats will hold the White House until 2032 and beyond.


Thank you for explaining that to me.

I will say, that is pretty much what I as a conservative was hoping for for WRT a second Obama term. I think you may find yourself disappointed with the results of that strategy.


Edited by CPWILL (01/20/20 12:11 AM)
_________________________
Winter Is Coming

Top
#320195 - 01/20/20 01:08 AM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: CPWILL]
Greger Online   content


Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 16486
Loc: Florida
If there's anything I've learned about politics it's that I will pretty much always be disappointed.
_________________________
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Top
#320212 - 01/20/20 03:36 PM Re: Warren v. Sanders [Re: Greger]
Hamish Howl Offline
newbie

Registered: 11/21/19
Posts: 487
Loc: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted By: Greger


A second Trump term won't be as successful as the first, or as pretty. It'll be easy to elect a progressive on Trump's heels in 2024, then Democrats will hold the White House until 2032 and beyond.


Historically-speaking, the left will hold office until things are looking good again.

Then the electorate goes out and finds themselves another preacher.
_________________________
What can we do to help you stop screaming?

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Who's Online
1 registered (Greger), 31 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
danarhea, RoughDraft274, CPWILL, Kevin Kohler, Keridan
6290 Registered Users
A2