Current Topics
the sins of sony and security
by jgw
1 second ago
Defense of the GOP
by Ardy
Today at 06:57 PM
Normalizing Cu ban Relations
by logtroll
Today at 06:20 PM
Round Table For The Month Of December, 2014
by Phil Hoskins
Today at 12:00 PM
Current case study: Oil and the Free Market
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 04:03 PM
Just a random thought that keeps circulating in my brain:
by NW Ponderer
12/17/14 10:42 AM
Graphic report on CIA interrogations, torture released by Senate panel
by Phil Hoskins
12/16/14 09:30 PM
Philip K. Dick would have been 86 today: Some thoughts on hi
by pondering_it_all
12/16/14 08:17 PM
Five GOP immigration myths
by pondering_it_all
12/15/14 03:12 PM
'Annie': Film Review
by pdx rick
12/15/14 12:19 AM
10 most dangerous jobs
by logtroll
12/14/14 02:36 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Golem
12/14/14 01:23 PM
police shootings, killings
by jgw
12/13/14 03:20 PM
Cromnibus? Cronybus? Crimnibus?
by logtroll
12/12/14 09:49 AM
I think I might be Catholic...
by logtroll
12/12/14 03:03 AM
Forum Stats
6003 Members
55 Forums
14501 Topics
249002 Posts

Max Online: 282 @ 05/29/08 01:08 AM
Google Adsense
Topic Options
#219165 - 04/06/12 08:52 AM Sauce for the Goose?
itstarted Offline
old hand

Registered: 01/27/03
Posts: 6368
Loc: Florida/Illinois
Bank Settlement - No fault

So, Here's the question:

If banks are corporations...
And corporations are People...
When banks can "buy" their way out of criminal charges...
Shouldn't people be allowed to do the same?...

Just asking!

Top
#219169 - 04/06/12 09:06 AM Re: Sauce for the Goose? [Re: itstarted]
Ted Remington Offline
old hand

Registered: 07/09/08
Posts: 4890

Fine by me.
_________________________
Take the nacilbupeR pledge: I solemnly swear that I will help back out all Republicans at the next election.

Top
#219196 - 04/06/12 02:52 PM Re: Sauce for the Goose? [Re: itstarted]
NW Ponderer Offline
Moderator
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 12048
"Fine" yuck, yuck....
_________________________
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich

Top
#219201 - 04/06/12 03:29 PM Re: Sauce for the Goose? [Re: NW Ponderer]
Greger Offline
veteran

Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 11848
Loc: Florida
Corporations are not just "people" they are a sort of ubermensch. Granted the same rights as individuals but not held to the same standards of liability, responsibility, or taxation.
_________________________
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde

Top
#219211 - 04/06/12 04:53 PM Re: Sauce for the Goose? [Re: itstarted]
numan Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/06/08
Posts: 10853
Loc: What! Me Worry?
'

At last! Hitler's dream of the Superman achieved! wink
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools -- Herbert Spencer

Top
#219219 - 04/06/12 07:34 PM Re: Sauce for the Goose? [Re: itstarted]
numan Offline
veteran

Registered: 08/06/08
Posts: 10853
Loc: What! Me Worry?
'
Originally Posted By: itstarted
If banks are corporations...
And corporations are People...
When banks can "buy" their way out of criminal charges...
Shouldn't people be allowed to do the same?...

Well, under the customs of the Germanic barbarians, which some people imagine to be a major impetus to the development of "democracy," people were allowed to do exactly that!

It was called wergeld

Quote:
Weregild (also spelled wergild, wergeld, weregeld, etc.) was a value placed on every human being and every piece of property in the Salic Code (Salic Law). If property was stolen, or someone was injured or killed, the guilty person would have to pay weregild as restitution to the victim's family or to the owner of the property.
The payment of weregild was an important legal mechanism in early Germanic society; the other common form of legal reparation at this time was blood revenge. The payment was typically made to the family or to the clan....
The size of the weregild was largely conditional upon the social rank of the victim. There used to be somewhat of a "basis" fee for a standard "free man", that could then be multiplied according to the social rank of the victim and the circumstances of the crime. The weregild for women relative to that of men of equal rank varied: among the Alamanni it was double the weregild of men, among the Saxons half that of men....
In 9th century Mercian law a regular freeman (churl) was in fact worth 200 shillings, a nobleman was worth 1200. The law code even mentions the weregeld for a king, at 30000, composed of 15000 for the man, paid to the royal family, and 15000 for the kingship, paid to the people. An archbishop is likewise valued at 15000. The weregild for a Welshman was 110 if he owned at least one hide of land, and 80 if he was landless.
Thralls and slaves legally commanded no weregild, but it was commonplace to make a nominal payment in the case of a thrall and the value of the slave in such a case. Technically this amount cannot be called a weregild, because it's more akin to a reimbursement to the owner for lost or damaged property.

The major difference today is that an Important Man, even in the unlikely case that he would be charged for the murder of a mere common man, can hire a crafty lawyer, and stand a very good chance of having all charges against him dismissed.
_________________________
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools -- Herbert Spencer

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 21 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
xiawei, Marzman, kyleyoung8, Retread, solafeian
6003 Registered Users
A2