Current Topics
Another Solution
by pondering_it_all
0 seconds ago
Is it too soon to be talking 2020?
by pondering_it_all
35 minutes 55 seconds ago
Yes, John Edwards is a precedent - that is bad for Trump
by NW Ponderer
Today at 01:26 AM
ICE - the new gestapo
by jgw
Yesterday at 07:24 PM
What Left?
by jgw
Yesterday at 07:17 PM
RoundTable for December 2018
by pdx rick
Yesterday at 05:12 PM
Justice is coming
by NW Ponderer
Yesterday at 04:32 PM
Archie Moore vs Yvon Durelle, December 10, 1958
by Greger
12/14/18 04:27 PM
Judge orders porn star Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293,000 in attorneys' fees,
by pondering_it_all
12/12/18 09:51 PM
Election Day
by NW Ponderer
12/12/18 03:42 PM
The Passing Parade: Obituaries: 2018
by Golem
12/10/18 09:15 PM
Smart watches: Need Xmas Advice for Wifey
by rporter314
12/10/18 04:32 PM
None of the Above (NOTA)
by rporter314
12/09/18 06:03 PM
Israel negotiating with Hungary on revisionist Holocaust museum
by pondering_it_all
12/07/18 11:22 PM
Brexit Eve
by NW Ponderer
12/04/18 04:26 PM
Miscellaneous humor thread
by Jeffery J. Haas
12/04/18 12:52 AM
Our political elders
by Greger
12/03/18 02:52 AM
Round table NOVEMBER 2018
by pondering_it_all
12/01/18 07:59 PM
Historic Corruption
by pondering_it_all
11/30/18 08:36 PM
Sleazy Slimeball or Slimy Sleazebag?
by Ujest Shurly
11/30/18 08:25 PM
Forum Stats
6248 Members
58 Forums
16431 Topics
283274 Posts

Max Online: 294 @ 12/06/17 12:57 AM
Google Adsense
Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Topic Options
#309014 - 10/21/18 08:16 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
Jeffery J. Haas Offline


Pooh-Bah

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 13416
Loc: Whittier, California
Sorry but if we had focused more on Kavanaugh's history of habitual lying, his ethical lapses, his affinity for ridiculous conspiracy theories and his untreated alcoholism, he would not be sitting in the SCOTUS today.
_________________________
"The Left ones think I'm Right, the Right ones think I'm wrong."
Leon Russell - Magic Mirror"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-H1iQ5Y6Eg

Top
#309019 - 10/21/18 11:22 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: Jeffery J. Haas]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6567
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Jeff ... you have not been paying attention. We are in an era when corruption is ok with the majority party. Why would a few peccadilloes bother these folks?

It would have been easier to confirm him.
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#309029 - 10/23/18 02:13 AM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8077
Loc: North San Diego County
I wonder what was in those 12 complaints about Kavanaugh that Justice Roberts was sitting on during the confirmation hearing.

Ignoring Supreme Court decisions?
No pants under the robe when he gets a hot defendant?
Kegger in his chambers every Friday night?

Kind of boggles the mind to think there must be nine more!

Top
#309030 - 10/23/18 03:59 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
rporter314 Offline
old hand

Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 6567
Loc: Highlands, Tx
Originally Posted By: source within quote
The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-364 (link is external) establishes a process by which any person can file a complaint alleging a federal judge has engaged in “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts” or has become, by reason of a mental or physical disability, “unable to discharge all the duties” of the judicial office.


"conduct prejudicial" sounds like misconduct and as examples

Originally Posted By: wiki
Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the judge's office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives; accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office; having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case; treating litigants or attorneys in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner; violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct, such as judicial rules of procedure or evidence, or those pertaining to restrictions on outside income and requirements for financial disclosure; and acting outside the jurisdiction of the court, or performance of official duties if the conduct might have a prejudicial effect on the administration of the business of the courts among reasonable people.


as a note of commentary, I will refer you specifically back to the last Senate hearing when J Kavanaugh gave his introductory remarks and allow you to derive your own conclusions as to relevance to actually complaints
_________________________
ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Top
#309041 - 10/23/18 11:45 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
pondering_it_all Offline
veteran

Registered: 02/27/06
Posts: 8077
Loc: North San Diego County
That tirade did kind of set him up for this: If he fails to recuse himself from any sort of Democrat versus Republican case, he violates many of those standards. If he does recuse himself, the Court is back to 4:4. Sometimes people surprise you. Jeff Sessions was smart enough to side-step going to jail when he recused himself. He obviously observed some bad stuff, and thought: "NOPE"

Top
#309055 - 10/24/18 09:16 PM Re: Kavanaugh and the FBI [Re: jgw]
jgw Offline
enthusiast

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 2198
Loc: Port Angeles, WA
Well, we're gonna find out pretty qwick, I figure. Even if he doesn't recuse, with the majority, it may make absolutely no difference.

Top
Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Who's Online
0 registered (), 47 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
TrentonP, Nosf50, erumonej, Jensen Breck, Albertapkr
6248 Registered Users
A2