Seems that some legal minds are attempting to argue that Bartnicki v. Vopper
applies to David Pecker.
Except that I run up against Bollea v. Gawker
and I don't understand how Bartnicki overturns Gawker and in the process makes REVENGE PORN legal again, more legal than it ever has been.
But I am not a lawyer, I don't even play one on TV.
Bartnicki versus Gawker, any takers?