Seems that some legal minds are attempting to argue that Bartnicki v. Vopper applies to David Pecker.

Except that I run up against Bollea v. Gawker and I don't understand how Bartnicki overturns Gawker and in the process makes REVENGE PORN legal again, more legal than it ever has been.

But I am not a lawyer, I don't even play one on TV.

Bartnicki versus Gawker, any takers? ThumbsUp
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)