Loc: Whittier, California
Originally Posted By: chunkstyle
I would put it higher than different point of view but anything that splits with what we have as conventional political wisdom would be a good start.
Does it absolutely HAVE to be an instant, binary and drastic split? I ask not because of a need to advocate for incrementalism, but because my impression is that incrementalism is about as radical as it gets for societies short of what IS actually instant: REVOLUTION. (usually bloody - sometimes not)
There's no Osterizer 7-speed levels of LOW, SPIN, CHOP, WHIP, PUREE, HIGH.
There's just three speeds:
1. STAGNANT (stable) 2. INCREMENTAL 3. "Oh SH!T"
The only people pushing the Athenian Straw Man Nonexistent Threat of Slippery Slope Windyfoggery (ASMNSSW) RE DEMOCRACY are people who have a misunderstanding/problem or hatred of democracy. (See AUTHORITARIANS)