Iím not that sensitive, so I donít have any comment about any personal attack. But calling Sanders a loser over and over because he didnít sponsor any major legislation didnít look rational to me. Itís just my opinion, and I linked an article to support my view.
It wasnít a personal attack, it was an observation. After reading my link, do you still hold the opinion that Sanders is an empty footnote in history?
OK, so now I'm over-sensitive too, not just emotional and irrational. Gee, thanks. I guess it comes with the territory, right? You know, emotional, sensitive, irrational people... What's next, hysterical?
I've already replied to your observation on amendments. Post #326037 above. I was fully aware that he has sponsored amendments; just not impressed by that.
And I didn't say Sanders is a loser because he didn't sponsor major legislation. I said he is ineffective for this reason. Yes, I did call him a loser, but that's because of another reason: he lost. Twice. And one of them, to one of the worst candidates in History.
No, I don't hold the opinion that Sanders is an empty footnote in history. Like I said, he does have a claim to fame: having helped the election of Donald J. Trump.
Edited by GreatNewsTonight (05/25/2003:45 AM)
_________________________ Please take COVID-19 seriously; don't panic but don't deny it; practice social distancing (stay 6ft from people); wash your hands a lot, don't touch your face, don't gather with too many people, so that you help us contain it.