Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Current Topics
Winning
by Jeffery J. Haas - 07/31/21 09:00 PM
Government
by perotista - 07/31/21 07:36 PM
no vaccine folks
by pondering_it_all - 07/31/21 06:30 PM
The Disintegration of Trumpism
by perotista - 07/30/21 04:01 PM
California Drought, Grapes of Wrath in Reverse?
by Greger - 07/30/21 02:19 PM
Summertime Roundtable
by logtroll - 07/30/21 12:56 PM
Lies and the Law
by Greger - 07/30/21 01:18 AM
Vaccines, over 65, youth
by Jeffery J. Haas - 07/29/21 11:04 AM
Arizona Audit/Recount 2020 election
by pondering_it_all - 07/27/21 11:54 PM
Roundtable for Spring 2021
by Jeffery J. Haas - 07/26/21 12:18 PM
cdc report
by pondering_it_all - 07/23/21 08:47 PM
lamda variant
by Jeffery J. Haas - 07/23/21 04:15 PM
Haiti - little problem
by Greger - 07/21/21 05:39 PM
Hyperinflation, debt, and the survival of nations
by pondering_it_all - 07/12/21 08:26 PM
National Commission to Investigate the January 6
by perotista - 07/03/21 04:10 PM
Say no to bipartisanship
by perotista - 07/02/21 12:32 AM
Popular Topics(Views)
9,383,054 my own book page
4,587,894 We shall overcome
3,575,066 Campaign 2016
3,292,612 Trump's Trumpet
2,572,895 3 word story game
Thread Like Summary
NW Ponderer
Total Likes: 2
Original Post (Thread Starter)
by NW Ponderer
NW Ponderer
This is a fraught topic, touching on both gun "rights" and "originalism" in judicial philosophy, but here goes: Barrett and Gorsuch Have to Choose Between Originalism and Expanding Gun Rights (Slate). The premise of the piece is that the Heller decision, which animated "gun rights" (creating a "right" that didn't previously exist), has been undercut by a decade of research that demonstrates its historical basis was just plain wrong.
Quote
Justices Gorsuch and Barrett have staked their reputations on their commitment to apply originalist methods in a neutral manner and let the evidence dictate the outcome. Will they follow through on that promise in Corlett? Research and scholarship published in the decade after Heller will force them to put their earlier promises to the test. It now seems clear that if they apply originalism in a neutral fashion they will have to choose between Heller’s methodology and Heller’s conclusions.

To expand slightly, the article is inspired by the Supreme Court's acceptance of a case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett, challenging New York's restrictive "concealed carry" law, which requires a justification for the permit to be granted. The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Ready to Create a Constitutional Right to Concealed Carry (Slate). I'll have more to say, but I want to get this out there.
Liked Replies
by Greger
Greger
Not to put too fine a point on it but originalism is bullsh*t.

The second amendment doesn't say what they say it says and everybody knows it.

Gun ownership under the 2A was an obligation not a right. When the obligation ended it didn't automatically become a right.

Barret and Gorsuch will side with the Republican base because they are part of the Republican base. It won't be a difficult choice for them.
1 member likes this
by logtroll
logtroll
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Are they really "originalist", or, like Scalia, opportunists in originalist clothing?
I think they are frauds in cheat's clothing. Coincidentally, that also happens to be the current operative definition of "Conservative".
1 member likes this
Who's Online Now
1 members (Jeffery J. Haas), 42 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
KevFilthyANML, Risky, Gladys G. Jackson, Beach Baby, Superfly
6,296 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics17,167
Posts308,794
Members6,296
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.21 Page Time: 0.163s Queries: 11 (0.154s) Memory: 2.6798 MB (Peak: 2.8151 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-07-31 21:33:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS