All great points and this thread is but one of innumerable thousands like it, both online, and in person, that have been argued to death.
FDA approval will be an interesting development to watch.
Actually, I haven't seen the "reckless endangerment" tactic discussed or argued anywhere. I don't even think that it needs to be argued in order for it to be used - the argument would be in court. It doesn't require any mandates or new laws - I think it could be the basis for real lawsuits now.
If anti-maskers/vaxxers thought they could be sued for damages from willful negligence resulting in infecting others, many of them might take the easy way and just get the jab.