Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Current Topics
Trump's Resentfuls
by perotista - 06/16/21 07:51 PM
Vaccines, over 65, youth
by Greger - 06/16/21 01:52 PM
Confused
by Greger - 06/16/21 01:47 PM
Roundtable for Spring 2021
by logtroll - 06/16/21 12:25 AM
Arizona Audit/Recount 2020 election
by Greger - 06/15/21 03:40 PM
Say no to bipartisanship
by perotista - 06/09/21 02:58 AM
Social Media
by jgw - 06/08/21 05:19 PM
History of American Hate
by jgw - 06/06/21 06:25 PM
Tower of Babel - an origin myth
by pondering_it_all - 06/01/21 12:38 AM
Commonalities, Diversity, Amalgamation
by NW Ponderer - 05/30/21 10:07 PM
Lies and the Law
by jgw - 05/26/21 05:45 PM
Ousting Liz Cheney Could Backfire on the GOP
by perotista - 05/22/21 07:24 PM
infrastructure report card
by jgw - 05/22/21 04:56 PM
Popular Topics(Views)
9,217,513 my own book page
4,459,313 We shall overcome
3,412,869 Campaign 2016
3,165,963 Trump's Trumpet
2,479,812 3 word story game
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,501
Likes: 1
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,501
Likes: 1
'Disturbing and reckless': Retired brass spread election lie in attack on Biden (Politico). "The open letter from 124 retired officers alarmed current and former military members concerned about the politicization of the military."

Quote
A day after 124 retired generals and admirals released a letter spreading the lie that President Joe Biden stole the election, current and former military officers are speaking out, calling the missive a dangerous new sign of the military being dragged into the trenches of partisan warfare.

The open letter on Monday from a group calling itself Flag Officers 4 America advanced the false conspiracy theory that the presidential vote was rigged in Biden's favor and warned that the nation is "in deep peril" from "a full-blown assault on our Constitutional rights."
In a weak defense of the letter, it is an escalation of letters produced by other defense officials criticizing Trump's behavior and the January 6 insurrection (yes, it was an insurrection, by definition). And, it demonstrates that there are differences in the views of former military members. What I find disturbing is their deliberate use of their ranks in its publication, a violation of the UCMJ (as well as its bizarre content). This is, in my view, am exercise in Trumpism - blatant abuse of office for political gain. I welcome other views.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,525
Likes: 2
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,525
Likes: 2
This was my greatest fear following the election i.e. that some military would openly participate in the overthrow of a duly elected government. It would seem my fears were well founded. There is apparently a significant group of line officers who are not only political but are willing to take the next step. At what point will these guys begin ordering non-coms to occupy the WH?

I think there is little doubt some of these guys have already recruited Trump loyalists in cadres ready to be deployed. Ask yourself, do the Joint Chiefs have real control over the troops.


ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 62 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
KevFilthyANML, Risky, Gladys G. Jackson, Beach Baby, Superfly
6,296 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics17,157
Posts308,436
Members6,296
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.20 Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 19 (0.002s) Memory: 2.9566 MB (Peak: 3.2530 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-06-17 00:08:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS