Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Current Topics
What's for dinner?
by olyve - 12/05/21 12:41 AM
lying on the internet
by jgw - 12/04/21 11:30 PM
Winning
by jgw - 12/04/21 11:23 PM
RoundTable For Fall 2021
by pdx rick - 12/04/21 11:08 PM
... doubt is our product...
by TatumAH - 12/04/21 08:13 PM
Beautiful, beautiful language...
by logtroll - 12/04/21 05:19 PM
A Musical Quiz
by Ken Condon - 12/04/21 03:46 AM
Denialism
by Greger - 12/03/21 03:37 PM
Coronavirus: The Plague of The 21st Century?
by pondering_it_all - 12/01/21 08:51 PM
I’ll Buy That
by Greger - 12/01/21 07:22 PM
Boundaries for Facebook
by jgw - 11/30/21 06:26 PM
Pacific Northwest Weather
by pdx rick - 11/28/21 08:59 PM
A Fungus Amungus
by logtroll - 11/28/21 01:25 PM
Republicans promise brutal revenge in 2022
by pdx rick - 11/27/21 08:45 PM
masks and vaccinations
by logtroll - 11/27/21 01:36 PM
Vigilantism - why isn’t it illegal?
by logtroll - 11/25/21 11:46 PM
"Mom, I think it's a boy."
by TatumAH - 11/25/21 04:37 AM
Popular Topics(Views)
9,689,054 my own book page
4,786,119 We shall overcome
3,875,421 Campaign 2016
3,532,227 Trump's Trumpet
2,796,742 3 word story game
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 23 of 50 1 2 21 22 23 24 25 49 50
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,953
Likes: 30
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,953
Likes: 30
God, I hope they approve you Loggy...prayers for best turnout.


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 362
newbie
Offline
newbie
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 362
'
Are we going to Hell in capitalist Rolls Royce or in socialist mass transit?

Some people might think the destination more important than the mode of transport.
.


Once, weapons were manufactured to fight wars; today, wars are manufactured to sell weapons

It is far easier to deceive folks than to convince them they are deceived
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 362
newbie
Offline
newbie
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 362
'
Western civilization collapsed in 1914, as ancient Rome collapsed in 476 AD.

Read Margaret MacMillan's THE WAR THAT ENDED PEACE.

Ever since then, we have lived in an age of barbarism that shows no signs of ever ending.
.


Once, weapons were manufactured to fight wars; today, wars are manufactured to sell weapons

It is far easier to deceive folks than to convince them they are deceived
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 45
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 45
Why mathew, it's so good to see you!
An end is finally in sight now, climate change should pretty much wipe us out in the next couple hundred years unless we make some pretty drastic changes.
I don't really see any changes on the horizon.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 71
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 71
When you actually look at the carbon cycle model, with all the compartments and flows, you notice that putting carbon into the soil could actually offset all the fossil fuel burning and more. If we did that to the extent that the soil had before we farmed it to death, CO2 movement into the atmosphere would turn negative. Of course, once we got the soil saturated with carbon, it would rise again but maybe no faster than movement from the atmosphere into the ocean would handle.

It's an interesting model because it has very short, short, and long sequestration loops as burning fuel crops, soil carbon coming out over the course of decades, and limestone deposits locking up carbon for epochs, respectively. I suppose all the models are incorrect because they don't include methane clathrates bubbling out of the not-so-permafrost.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,650
Likes: 55
L
veteran
Offline
veteran
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,650
Likes: 55
Soil carbon is an important piece of our model.

I have been getting a lot of inquiries in the past several weeks, and the range of applications is very interesting. Yesterday I spoke with a fellow with a new sawmill venture in Dolores, CO. They will be generating a lot of waste (about half of the wood in a log is turned into waste biomass when sawing boards) and they will need to dry the lumber. If they use pyrolyzers instead of biomass burners to make the heat for the kilns they can avoid using fossil fuels and make as much money from the biochar as they will make from the lumber. He was pretty enthused.

Thursday I visited a pecan processor in Las Cruces, NM, who is currently giving away the shells as they are a waste liability. I was looking for a source of shells since we presently can't get any woody biomass from the Forest Service and I happened to ask if they had any process heat needs. As it happens, they buy $4,400 worth of natural gas every month to sterilize the nuts in a hot water bath and to dry them afterwards. I did a pro forma this morning that indicates we could provide them with a biochar+heat pyrolysis system that would replace their NG bill using about 20% of their shell production and make $500,000 in char (at below the rock bottom of current market prices). The ROI on the heat component alone would be 20% annually, and with char sales included the ROI would be 200%. They are kind of excited at the prospect. As it happens, two of the owners are also pecan farmers, so they can use the biochar in their orchards and then market their demonstrated soil improvements to the rest of their supply chain, thus building the market for the char.

So what do you call it - Capitalism, or Socialism - if a person became wealthy as a result of using their time and money to create sustainable local economies where large numbers of people benefitted, where lots of jobs were made, and environmental problems were reversed?

I am calling it Americanism. The Green New Deal needs to adopt this approach.


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 71
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 71
It is capitalism but with zero externalization of costs. In fact, the "costs" of the business are negative, which should mean that a lot of people will start doing it. People do like to make money, you know! In this unusual case they don't have to screw anybody or the environment over to do that. That's real technological progress.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 45
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 45
Quote:
So what do you call it - Capitalism, or Socialism - if a person became wealthy as a result of using their time and money....


That right there is capitalism, plain and simple. Entrepreneurism if you put a finer point on it.

It would be a mixed system if half his "wealth" went to the state to insure that everyone was well taken care of and...If a person worked and the state became wealthier, thus increasing the wealth of all then it would be a socialist system.

Whether his endeavor was a good thing environmentally or a bad thing doesn't effect the system. Sustainability is an entirely new concept.
Survival hasn't so much been an issue before either...


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,650
Likes: 55
L
veteran
Offline
veteran
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,650
Likes: 55
Originally Posted By: Greger
Quote:
So what do you call it - Capitalism, or Socialism - if a person became wealthy as a result of using their time and money....
That right there is capitalism, plain and simple.

I'm afeared you boys are just skittering along on the surface of this thing. If a person looks the part that follows the quote above, you will see that a big chunk of the purpose of using that time and money is to improve the general welfare of all - some directly, more indirectly.

There have been lawsuits where shareholders in corporations have sued their boards of directors for pursuing objectives that were not strictly about increasing their capital. That is Capitalism at its most raw-bonedness. In our organizing documents it clearly states that the purpose of the company is to improve the triple-bottom-line - people, planet, and profit. So far, every single one of my investors has declared that their top interest in the company is climate change... second is community vitality and sustainability. There are about a dozen expected benefits and the last on everyone's list is making money - in fact five of the six (so far) say they only hope to not lose their money.

I don't think this model fits in the box of Capitalism, or in the box of Socialism. That's why I claim a new box ... Americanism!


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,642
Likes: 25
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,642
Likes: 25
I'd like to play in your sandbox, Log. I agree it is "Americanism" - it aims at balancing free market economics, the strive for social fairness and the sustainable use and protection of the natural resources. Four Pillars.

Page 23 of 50 1 2 21 22 23 24 25 49 50

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 34 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
SuZQ2, KevFilthyANML, Risky, Gladys G. Jackson, Beach Baby
6,297 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics17,256
Posts313,069
Members6,297
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.26 Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 36 (0.010s) Memory: 3.0424 MB (Peak: 3.2531 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-12-05 00:59:50 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS