Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Current Topics
Retailers
by Mellowicious - 10/28/21 01:22 AM
RoundTable For Fall 2021
by TatumAH - 10/28/21 01:18 AM
Trump screws up
by jgw - 10/27/21 06:07 PM
REWARD: Vote Fraud
by rporter314 - 10/27/21 03:48 PM
National Commission to Investigate the January 6
by rporter314 - 10/27/21 03:44 PM
Lyrics
by Mellowicious - 10/27/21 03:16 AM
Gerrymandering
by perotista - 10/27/21 12:24 AM
What's for dinner?
by Ken Condon - 10/26/21 05:36 PM
Winning
by perotista - 10/25/21 11:58 PM
Why and How can they?
by logtroll - 10/25/21 11:13 PM
A Fungus Amungus
by TatumAH - 10/25/21 03:38 PM
Joe Manchin thread
by Greger - 10/25/21 02:08 PM
Le Shrooms
by logtroll - 10/25/21 12:07 AM
U.S. Companies Bet Shoppers Will Keep Paying Higher Prices
by pondering_it_all - 10/24/21 08:35 PM
Bureaucracy
by jgw - 10/24/21 08:33 PM
The GOP, goop, and political Pop-tarts
by pdx rick - 10/23/21 03:12 PM
Carbon Sequestration
by pondering_it_all - 10/23/21 07:28 AM
What % of humanity is batsh!t crazy?
by TatumAH - 10/23/21 02:49 AM
A Question of Culture
by TatumAH - 10/23/21 02:43 AM
Popular Topics(Views)
9,600,788 my own book page
4,739,125 We shall overcome
3,790,116 Campaign 2016
3,463,276 Trump's Trumpet
2,729,668 3 word story game
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
This is a fraught topic, touching on both gun "rights" and "originalism" in judicial philosophy, but here goes: Barrett and Gorsuch Have to Choose Between Originalism and Expanding Gun Rights (Slate). The premise of the piece is that the Heller decision, which animated "gun rights" (creating a "right" that didn't previously exist), has been undercut by a decade of research that demonstrates its historical basis was just plain wrong.
Quote
Justices Gorsuch and Barrett have staked their reputations on their commitment to apply originalist methods in a neutral manner and let the evidence dictate the outcome. Will they follow through on that promise in Corlett? Research and scholarship published in the decade after Heller will force them to put their earlier promises to the test. It now seems clear that if they apply originalism in a neutral fashion they will have to choose between Heller’s methodology and Heller’s conclusions.

To expand slightly, the article is inspired by the Supreme Court's acceptance of a case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett, challenging New York's restrictive "concealed carry" law, which requires a justification for the permit to be granted. The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Ready to Create a Constitutional Right to Concealed Carry (Slate). I'll have more to say, but I want to get this out there.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,366
Likes: 37
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,366
Likes: 37
Not to put too fine a point on it but originalism is bullsh*t.

The second amendment doesn't say what they say it says and everybody knows it.

Gun ownership under the 2A was an obligation not a right. When the obligation ended it didn't automatically become a right.

Barret and Gorsuch will side with the Republican base because they are part of the Republican base. It won't be a difficult choice for them.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
1 member likes this: NW Ponderer
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
I happen to agree with all of those sentiments. While I fervently believe that people have a right to own guns, for whatever reason they like, I am also quite familiar with the history and purpose of the Second Amendment and know that Scalia's opinion in Heller was utter crap. It was, however, indicative of the vacuity of "originalism" as he espoused. What current research has established is just how far from historically accurate his opinion was.

I don't believe Gorsuch or Barrett are particularly principled, either. But the case itself presents an opportunity for them to show their true colors. Are they really "originalist", or, like Scalia, opportunists in originalist clothing?


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,478
Likes: 41
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,478
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Are they really "originalist", or, like Scalia, opportunists in originalist clothing?
I think they are frauds in cheat's clothing. Coincidentally, that also happens to be the current operative definition of "Conservative".


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
1 member likes this: NW Ponderer
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,397
Likes: 56
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,397
Likes: 56
The Founding Fathers all thought 10 was a suitable Age of Consent, back when they wrote the Constitution. Are the Originalists going to act on that? I don't think so. It was also perfectly legal to smoke weed, take any drug you wanted, and kill your servants on a whim.


We're flying electric helicopters on Mars yet you can't turn on your clothes dryer in Texas. That's because scientists are in charge of Mars, and Republicans are in charge of Texas.
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,598
Likes: 13
The majority of the framers thought owning humans was A-OK, or at least didn't think the United States could exist without allowing it.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,366
Likes: 37
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,366
Likes: 37
So I guess we're pretty clear that originalists aren't and never were originalists. They are simply using the framers as human shields.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 40 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
SuZQ2, KevFilthyANML, Risky, Gladys G. Jackson, Beach Baby
6,297 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics17,227
Posts311,610
Members6,297
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.24 Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 31 (0.003s) Memory: 2.9925 MB (Peak: 3.2531 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-10-28 01:32:45 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS