Originally Posted By: logtroll
I am very curious as to why some people work so hard to ignore the preponderance of science in favor of weird propaganda.

A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America is weird propaganda?
https://archive.archaeology.org/online/features/greenland/
An article from the NYT, quoting the National Academy of Sciences, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and other scientific organizations is weird propaganda?
http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/iceage/ny-times-1975-05-21.pdf
If those articles were supporting the claim of global warming they would be accepted as "settled science." But since they are not they are weird propaganda. Do I detect a double standard here?


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary